
See historic audits
Approved audits, including the current report. Hover or focus a point for values; select it to open the report.
Online Reputation
Executive Summary
Checks Passed
67 checks were evaluated within the available access and audit scope. 36 are PASS; 21 are WARN and 10 are FAIL. These counts show the results of evaluated checks, not a weighted quality score.
Executive Scoreboard
Executive Strength / Risk
This audit provides a consolidated executive view of how a brand’s digital presence supports—or weakens—its online reputation and the value of its digital investments. It evaluates key public indicators across semantic visibility, technical performance, legal and trust signals, platform consistency, reputation strength, and sector-specific competitive context. Rather than treating these signals in isolation, the audit examines their relationships and relevant correlations with commercial performance. Its final goal is to give senior executives a clear, evidence-based basis for identifying gaps, challenging internal assumptions, prioritizing corrective action, and making better-informed digital investment decisions.
Audit Report Definitions
Check Score
Audited online-presence quality indicator: PASS / (PASS + WARN + FAIL) × 100. Unverified and unavailable checks are excluded. This is not an overall brand or revenue score.
Verified Checks
Shows the checks ALO.NET Audit could evaluate using concrete evidence in this report. For example, 20/37 Verified Checks means that 20 of the 37 evaluated checks received PASS; the remainder may be WARN or FAIL. Unavailable, Unverified and excluded checks are outside this total.
Trust Basics
Summarizes basic website trust signals, including organizational identity, contact information, essential policies and trust infrastructure that help visitors and digital systems assess a website. It indicates basic trust hygiene and is neither a legal compliance certificate nor an overall reputation score.
Evidence Captured
Shows how many applicable checks have enough evidence for evaluation. For example, 48/83 means that usable evidence was obtained for 48 of 83 applicable checks. A higher value indicates broader audit coverage; it does not mean that the website performed well.
First Seen On Internet
Shows an estimated date from which the domain can be observed online. This is not the company incorporation date, the age of the brand or the opening date of a physical business. It provides context about the domain’s observable online history.
Matched Listings Avg. Rating
Shows the average user rating of Google Maps business listings reliably matched to the audited brand or website. Only verified entity matches are included; unrelated businesses with the same or a similar name are excluded. A qualified entity match does not necessarily mean that the listing’s Website field matches the audited domain.
Reviews Across Matched Listings
Shows the total number of user reviews across business listings matched to the brand. It indicates the volume of user feedback and provides context about online visibility. Review volume alone does not establish whether feedback is positive or negative.
Mobile PageSpeed
Shows website performance on mobile devices as a 0–100 score measured using Google Lighthouse/PageSpeed methodology. A higher score generally indicates better loading performance and user experience. This technical performance measure is produced by Google and is independent of the ALO.NET Check Score.
Executive Scoreboard
Provides an at-a-glance executive overview of key audit areas. Each row represents a different area and shows its PASS, WARN and FAIL results or the relevant system’s native score. Rows may use different measurement types, so their values should not always be compared directly as equivalent scores.
Legal Check
Examines whether essential legal and privacy information is accessible to users and search systems, together with related requirements that can be evaluated within the audit scope. ALO.NET Audit does not provide legal advice, and this result is not a legal compliance certificate.
AI Search Readiness
Separates captured query/page matching, search-assisted answers, own-domain sources, brand mentions, explicit recommendations and citation-free mentions. Results apply to the recorded query, market and response; unavailable observations remain neutral. Technical presence does not guarantee AI visibility or ranking.
Frontend Interaction Check
Examines visible interface and link signals that help visitors reach core actions such as contacting the business, searching, getting directions or making a reservation. Detecting a button or link does not establish that the corresponding action was successfully completed from end to end.
Semantic Quality
Evaluates structural and semantic signals that help people and machines understand page content. Headings, content relationships and related semantic cues help clarify what a page communicates.
PageSpeed | SEO Technical Quality
Summarizes measurable indicators of website performance and technical search readiness. Native PageSpeed/Lighthouse scores are provider measurements, rather than scores recreated by ALO.NET. They indicate technical quality but do not independently predict Google rankings.
Maps & Review Metrics
Evaluates verifiable Google Maps business listings, user ratings, review volume and, when available, comparable market evidence. Its purpose is to show the measurable portion of the brand’s local digital reputation within the audited scope.
Structured Data
Checks for structured data defined in website source code using standards such as Schema.org. This data can help search engines understand organizations, businesses, products, services and other content more accurately.
Social Presence
Evaluates the online presence of social media profiles verified as belonging to the brand. The result reflects verifiable brand presence, rather than follower counts or social media success.
Search Presence
Evaluates verifiable signals about whether the brand and website can be found by search systems. It shows available search visibility evidence and does not guarantee a ranking for any particular keyword.
Social Links
Checks links from the website’s own pages to the brand’s social media profiles. These links help establish an explicit first-party relationship between the website and the social accounts.
PASS / WARN / FAIL
PASS means sufficient positive evidence was found for the evaluated condition. WARN means the result is partly positive but needs attention. FAIL means an evaluated check did not meet the expected condition. These statuses apply only to checks that could actually be evaluated.
Acibadem is a healthcare provider offering healthcare services. The matched Google Maps listing records 4.4/5 from 3,389 reviews. The website links to Instagram, Facebook and LinkedIn profiles. Further service details and geographic coverage are not added where the collected profile does not substantiate them. The description distinguishes the offer declared on the website from observations made through public channels.
Acıbadem Altunizade Hastanesi is the representative hospital selected from 10 verified hospitals using the established Maps focal selection after hospital and first-party identity checks. This audit evaluates the submitted entity https://www.acibadem.com.tr/. Local competitive context uses one verified operating unit; its entry-page evidence does not replace the full audit identity or evidence. Maps/Nearby presentation refreshed from this audit's retained evidence on 2026-10-13T19:22:13+00:00. Original audit date, findings and scores are unchanged. Comparison scope: Representative local hospital market · within 5 km of Acıbadem Altunizade Hastanesi 5 local peers independently checked against the same 6 ALO.NET entry-page evidence controls. X: Verified Entry-page Evidence (%) = PASS / 6. Y: Google Maps rating. Bubble area scales with review count. Maps supplies discovery and reputation metadata; ALO supplies the entry-page evidence. This is not a composite market score. The dark outline marks the focal business. All plotted web evidence uses peer_probe_v1, including the focal business; a probe is not a full audit. peer_probe_v1 · Representative branch entry-page probe; the full audit covers the brand/root. peer_probe_v1 · Peer probe only; no full audit linked. peer_probe_v1 · Peer probe only; no full audit linked. peer_probe_v1 · Peer probe only; no full audit linked. peer_probe_v1 · Peer probe only; no full audit linked. peer_probe_v1 · Peer probe only; no full audit linked. ALO.NET Audited Cohort: Compatible saved full audits. This population and its historical axes are separate from Local Market web probes.Representative Local Market · Acıbadem Altunizade Hastanesi
Evaluated local points (Healthcare)
Business / website Distance First seen on internet Online age PASS % Maps rating Reviews Evaluation / provenance You · Acıbadem Altunizade Hastanesi
acibadem.com.tr0 m Not verified Not verified 50% 4.4 3389 Control evidence
2026-10-02T12:01:08+00:00 · ALO entry-page evaluation + Google Places metadataUskudar State Hospital
saglik.gov.tr706 m Not verified Not verified 16.7% 3.4 708 Control evidence
2026-10-02T12:01:10+00:00 · ALO entry-page evaluation + Google Places metadataBaşkent University Istanbul Hospital
istanbulbaskentuniversitesi.com735 m Not verified Not verified 33.3% 3.6 1036 Control evidence
2026-10-02T12:01:10+00:00 · ALO entry-page evaluation + Google Places metadataMedipol Koşuyolu Hospital
medipol.com.tr1859 m Not verified Not verified 66.7% 3.3 1004 Control evidence
2026-10-02T12:01:12+00:00 · ALO entry-page evaluation + Google Places metadataÖzel Moodist Hastanesi
moodisthastanesi.com1994 m Not verified Not verified 50% 4.2 599 Control evidence
2026-10-02T12:01:15+00:00 · ALO entry-page evaluation + Google Places metadataMEDICANA Çamlıca Hospital
medicana.com.tr3259 m Not verified Not verified 66.7% 2.7 1115 Control evidence
2026-10-02T12:01:16+00:00 · ALO entry-page evaluation + Google Places metadataEvidence data and provenance
Scope Representative Local Market · Acıbadem Altunizade Hastanesi Audited root/entity https://www.acibadem.com.tr/ Selected physical unit Acıbadem Altunizade Hastanesi Unit type hospital Matched locations 10 Sector control pack healthcare_local_positioning_v1 First-party entry URL https://www.acibadem.com.tr/hastane/altunizade-hastanesi/ Entry selection Selected from the persisted first-party and Maps identity evidence. Selection provenance Hospital-primary identity and first-party verification. Selected unit Maps rating 4.4 Selected unit Maps reviews 3389 Entry-page evidence Evaluated with the sector control pack. Competitor probing 5 genuine local peer website probes were evaluated.
X: Verified Checks, 0-100 (this audit's eligible-control scale is planned to expand toward 100). Y: verified passes across 12 shared evaluated controls, shown as a count, not a percent. Marker size scales with Verified Checks; legend order and color are identity-only, not a leaderboard.Brand Verified Checks Shared passes You 36/67 7/12 doruktip.com 34/56 10/12 dorukhospital.com 22/47 7/12 jimer.com.tr 25/53 5/12 santeplusgroup.com 12/31 7/12 amerikanhastanesi.org 14/34 5/12
Observed weakness: Customer-facing governance is the selected weakness. The evaluated disclosures were: Patient rights, complaints and contact was incomplete and Patient privacy / local equivalent and sensitive health data was incomplete. The conclusion is limited to the linked evaluated evidence; unavailable or unverified information is a measurement boundary rather than proof of absence. see details ↓
Observed strength: Search-to-care journey clarity is the selected strength. The audited entry point presented usable publisher search copy. This is high-confidence decision-journey evidence for the search-to-care journey; it does not establish the live Google result, patients' response, conversion or revenue. see details ↓
Management Decision: Management should assign a named owner and review date to customer-facing governance, then use a relevant first-party journey indicator to test whether the exposure is reduced. It should preserve search-to-care journey clarity as a managed public strength while keeping the conclusion within the cited confidence, cohort and measurement limits. The review should test whether patients can move from discovery to appointment action without ambiguity, separating observed change from assumed commercial impact. see details ↓
Supporting Market Evidence: Within the Türkiye audit market, Google Maps identified 10 qualified location listings associated with the audited entity. This is market-bounded evidence, not a complete worldwide physical footprint. see details ↓
customer-facing governance: Observed evidence: Legal Check evaluated Patient rights, complaints and contact was incomplete and Patient privacy / local equivalent and sensitive health data was incomplete. Why management should care: Management may be less able to reconstruct the relevant patient-facing disclosure presented at the appointment or patient-data decision point. see details ↓
search-to-care journey clarity: Observed evidence: A domain-matched live Google result was captured. Management value: The first search interaction may not communicate service relevance or the appointment next step clearly enough for patients. The public signal should be protected, but it is not proof of a commercial outcome. see details ↓
machine-readable business clarity: Observed evidence: Structured entity data was detected. Management value: Search platforms may receive an incomplete relationship between the provider, locations, services and clinicians. The public signal should be protected, but it is not proof of a commercial outcome. see details ↓
Audit Scope: Audit market: Türkiye. The market was estimated from the auditor's IP connection at submission. Google SERP and Google Maps evidence is limited to this market, including for global brands; the audit does not automatically classify the entity as global or regional. see details ↓
90 days Priorities
- What proposition and next step should a patient see at the search decision point, and who owns its consistency? see details ↓
- Can the business retrieve the relevant patient-facing disclosure, including the exact version, timestamp and responsible owner, for the relevant patient decision? see details ↓
- Do Brand, Digital and Operations agree on the canonical entity, location and offer relationships that public platforms should understand? see details ↓
90-Day Priority Actions
- Improve the measured publisher-controlled search metadata, then recheck.Measured evidence supports a bounded remediation; ranking uses the recorded score gap, relevance weight, confidence and actionability.
- Review and correct the measured policy-disclosure weakness.Measured evidence supports a bounded remediation; ranking uses the recorded score gap, relevance weight, confidence and actionability.
- Preserve the verified organization markup and revalidate it after publisher changes.The stored snapshot records a measured evidence rationale and bounded remediation assessment.
Google PageSpeed/SEO — www.acibadem.com.tr
Page speed shapes first impressions before a single word is read. A low Performance score — especially on mobile — means visitors leave before engaging. Google uses Core Web Vitals as a ranking signal, so poor speed hurts discoverability. The SEO score here reflects technical crawlability only, not full SEO strength. Accessibility measures inclusivity. Best Practices flags security and standards compliance. Together, these reveal how seriously the digital asset is maintained.
Evidence details ▾
Mobile: FAIL (10200.542647129 ms) [stale]; Desktop: PASS (1401.0200555805 ms) [stale]. Lighthouse lab measurement of the tested entry; not field Core Web Vitals.
Mobile: PASS (0.037941679744998 unitless) [stale]; Desktop: PASS (0.0039811937206152 unitless) [stale]. Lighthouse lab measurement of the tested entry; not field Core Web Vitals.
Mobile: FAIL (746.5 ms) [stale]; Desktop: FAIL (797 ms) [stale]. Lab main-thread blocking proxy; not field INP or verified real-user responsiveness.
Mobile: FAIL [stale]; Desktop: FAIL [stale]. Automated tested-page markup finding; not whole-site accessibility or WCAG compliance.
Mobile: PASS [stale]; Desktop: PASS [stale]. Automated tested-page markup finding; not whole-site accessibility or WCAG compliance.
Mobile: PASS [stale]; Desktop: PASS [stale]. Tested entry indexing directives only; no proof of search inclusion, robots access or whole-site crawlability. Intentional noindex needs publisher review.
Google Maps Reviews
Default focal branch: Acıbadem Altunizade Hastanesi
Automatically selected from qualified mature listings, prioritizing audited-site identity and Website domain linkage, then Google review volume.
This is a branch-level comparison and does not represent the complete multi-location brand.
Other eligible branches require branch selection for separate benchmarking.
Based on 8 quality-qualified current operational-location peers in the local market around the audited location expanded up to 25 km, the current review-footprint distribution is kept separate from age-adjusted eligibility. Cohort validity: limited; sample confidence: Low.
Age-adjusted review volume uses 8 eligible peers. At the focal listing's observed online age, P25 / median / P75 are 1,152 / 1,951 / 2,655 reviews; the audited listing has 3,389.
Its 4.4 Google rating is above the peer median of 3.6. Rating-eligible peer sample: 8. Audited rating percentile: 100th percentile.
Source: Google Maps · Benchmark methodology: ALO.NET
Competitive Google Maps Review Volume vs Comparable Peers
Above peer marketCurrent review footprint - not Review Momentum and not age-normalized.
The audited listing's current Google Maps review footprint is above comparable peers in the local competitive set.
8 comparable Google Maps peers | Low sample confidence | cohort validity: limited | current raw review-count distribution | ALO.NET methodology | calculated 2026-10-02 | the local market around the audited location | Attempted radii: 2 km, 5 km, 12 km, 25 km.
Competitive Reputation Position
Above-median peer positionTwo validated Google Maps peer percentiles shown together - not a synthetic score.
Bubbles prioritize the highest-review paired peers; all paired peers remain in both axis statistics.
- 1. Bahçeşehir Üniversite H… · 4.0 / 5,850
- 2. Medicana Kadıköy Hospit… · 3.5 / 2,573
- 3. Medipol University Çaml… · 3.5 / 1,975
- 4. SBÜ Zeynep Kamil Kadın … · 3.3 / 1,044
- 5. Başkent University Ista… · 3.6 / 1,036
- 6. Hisar Hospital Çamlıca · 4.1 / 839
- 7. Özel Moodist Hastanesi · 4.2 / 599
- 8. Kadıköy Florence Nighti… · 3.2 / 429
Competitive read: Both signals are above the qualified-peer median; limited cohort validity prevents a decision-grade market classification.
8 paired comparable Google Maps peers | Low sample confidence | cohort validity: limited | shared persisted Rating ∩ Review Volume peer-ID denominator | median crosshair = paired-cohort 50th percentile | ALO.NET methodology | calculated 2026-10-02 | Attempted radii: 2 km, 5 km, 12 km, 25 km.
ALO.NET KPI Profile
Six-pillar evidence coverage and status distribution. Verified Checks remains separate and no KPI maturity score is inferred.
Where is verified KPI evidence concentrated?
Raw deterministic evidence states are compared across all six approved pillars. Bar length is a count, not maturity or a KPI score.
Canonical findings and evidence ownership
Verified capabilities and gaps retain their evidence scope. Source observations do not prove rendered interaction. Findings are ordered by status and control ID; commercial impact is not ranked.
Online Discoverability
- Verified capability: Facebook profile linkage · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Instagram profile linkage · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: LinkedIn profile linkage · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: X profile linkage · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: YouTube profile linkage · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Entry-page indexing directives · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface — Mobile: PASS [stale]; Desktop: PASS [stale]. Tested entry indexing directives only; no proof of search inclusion, robots access or whole-site crawlability. Intentional noindex needs publisher review.
- Verified capability: Publisher description quality · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Search result language consistency · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified gap: Publisher title quality · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Pinterest profile linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: TikTok profile linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Declared location linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
Reputation & Trust
- Verified capability: Blocklist exposure · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: SPF policy · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Instagram visual identity · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: YouTube visual identity · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Comparable rating position · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: Matched listing rating · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: Secure connection · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Site icon presence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Cross-channel visual identity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Facebook visual identity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: LinkedIn visual identity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: DMARC policy · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Facebook public profile presence · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: Instagram public profile presence · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: LinkedIn public profile presence · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: X public profile presence · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: YouTube public profile presence · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: X visual identity · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: About identity evidence · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Content freshness evidence · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
Website Experience & Performance
- Verified capability: Form input labels · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface — Mobile: PASS [stale]; Desktop: PASS [stale]. Automated tested-page markup finding; not whole-site accessibility or WCAG compliance.
- Verified capability: Layout stability (lab) · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface — Mobile: PASS (0.037941679744998 unitless) [stale]; Desktop: PASS (0.0039811937206152 unitless) [stale]. Lighthouse lab measurement of the tested entry; not field Core Web Vitals.
- Verified capability: Accessibility markup basics · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Responsive viewport declaration · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Accessible button names · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface — Mobile: FAIL [stale]; Desktop: FAIL [stale]. Automated tested-page markup finding; not whole-site accessibility or WCAG compliance.
- Verified gap: Accessible link names · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface — Mobile: FAIL [stale]; Desktop: FAIL [stale]. Automated tested-page markup finding; not whole-site accessibility or WCAG compliance.
- Verified gap: Blocking responsiveness proxy (lab) · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface — Mobile: FAIL (746.5 ms) [stale]; Desktop: FAIL (797 ms) [stale]. Lab main-thread blocking proxy; not field INP or verified real-user responsiveness.
- Verified gap: Largest contentful paint (lab) · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface — Mobile: FAIL (10200.542647129 ms) [stale]; Desktop: PASS (1401.0200555805 ms) [stale]. Lighthouse lab measurement of the tested entry; not field Core Web Vitals.
- Verified gap: Mobile lab performance · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Desktop lab performance · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Image format hygiene · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
Measurement & Conversion Readiness
- Verified capability: Contact path evidence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Directions markup actionability · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Email markup actionability · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Phone markup actionability · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Rendered interaction evidence · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Analytics script declaration · UNAVAILABLE · Publisher-controlled surface — Usable entry-page source was unavailable; tag presence was not evaluated.
- Evidence gap: Tag manager declaration · UNAVAILABLE · Publisher-controlled surface — Usable entry-page source was unavailable; tag presence was not evaluated.
- Source observation: Primary CTA markup · INFORMATIONAL · Publisher-controlled surface — At least one primary CTA exposes a native destination or form action in source markup.
Semantic & AI Readiness
- Verified capability: Search result message relevance · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: Conversion intent alignment · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Primary offer clarity · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Organization structured identity · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Machine readability basics · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Navigation intent alignment · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Local business structured identity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Breadcrumb structured data · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Product or service structured identity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Review structured data · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Locale content coherence · UNAVAILABLE · Publisher-controlled surface
Legal & Privacy Governance
- Verified capability: Benchmark legal quality · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Implementation legal quality · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Cookie policy indexed discoverability · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: Patient rights indexed discoverability · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: Privacy & data protection indexed discoverability · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: Cookie notice presence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Privacy policy presence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Appointment cancellation indexed discoverability · FAIL · Platform evidence
- Verified gap: Freshness legal quality · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Jurisdiction legal quality · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Sector legal quality · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Healthcare Entity / Controller Identity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: On-site Legal Discoverability & Freshness · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Patient Privacy & Sensitive Health Data · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Patient Rights / Complaints · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Privacy / Data Protection · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Accessibility / Patient-Facing Transparency · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Appointment & Medical Form Transparency · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Cookie & Consent · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Terms presence · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
How do Mobile and Desktop Lighthouse results compare?
This compares the stored Lighthouse category results by device; the four categories are not averaged into a new score.
How is Google Maps review volume distributed across matched locations?
Bar length represents review volume only; rating is shown separately in labels and details.
Percentiles withheld: a defensible branch-level peer matching unit was not established.
Accessible KPI evidence table
| Pillar | Evaluated / applicable | PASS | WARN | FAIL | Unverified | Unavailable | Evidence coverage | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Online Discoverability | 9 / 12 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9 of 12 applicable controls evaluated | Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control |
| Reputation & Trust | 11 / 20 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 11 of 20 applicable controls evaluated | Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control |
| Website Experience & Performance | 11 / 11 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 11 of 11 applicable controls evaluated | Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control |
| Measurement & Conversion Readiness | 4 / 8 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 of 8 applicable controls evaluated | Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control |
| Semantic & AI Readiness | 10 / 11 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 of 11 applicable controls evaluated | Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control |
| Legal & Privacy Governance | 16 / 20 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 16 of 20 applicable controls evaluated | Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control |
Accessible PageSpeed data table
| Device | Performance | Accessibility | Best Practices | SEO | Source collection time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 45 | 76 | 100 | 100 | 2026-10-01T21:08:12.428Z |
| Desktop | 64 | 76 | 81 | 100 | 2026-10-01T21:08:12.236Z |
Accessible Maps location data table
| Location | Reviews | Rating | Focal status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acıbadem Altunizade Hastanesi | 3389 | 4.4 | Selected focal branch |
| Acıbadem Ataşehir Hospital | 3286 | 4.6 | Matched location |
| Acibadem Maslak Hospital | 3065 | 4.4 | Matched location |
| Eskişehir Acibadem Hospital | 2286 | 4.3 | Matched location |
| Bursa Acibadem Hospital | 2066 | 4.5 | Matched location |
| Acibadem Hospital in Kayseri | 2018 | 4.3 | Matched location |
| Acıbadem Kozyatağı Hospital | 1695 | 4.5 | Matched location |
| Acıbadem Hospital Taksim | 1656 | 4.5 | Matched location |
| Acibadem Hospital Ankara | 1620 | 4.4 | Matched location |
| Acıbadem Kadıköy Hospital | 1220 | 4.5 | Matched location |
Measurement & Conversion Readiness
Evidence details ▾
Usable entry-page source was unavailable; tag presence was not evaluated.
Usable entry-page source was unavailable; tag presence was not evaluated.
Google-Indexed Legal Discoverability
Indexed-search discoverability only. This is separate from audited-site presence in Trust Basics and content completeness in Legal Check.
Indexed-search coverage: 8 of 8 concept-locale checks were evaluated; 6 were clearly discoverable, 0 were weak or ambiguous, 2 were not detected, and 0 were unavailable. An unavailable indexed-search check is not evidence that the policy is absent from the live website.
Strongest indexed evidenceAcıbadem Life Mikrobiyota
Indexed evidence URLs, titles and snippets
- Acıbadem Life Mikrobiyota
Çerez Politikası Gizlilik Politikası KVKK · llms.txt Sizi Arayalım WhatsApp. Sizi Hemen Arayalım. ×. Mobil uygulamayı hemen indirin, ücretsiz üye olun. Temizle.
- Kişisel Verilerin Korunması - Acıbadem
(iv) KİŞİSEL VERİ SAHİBİ BAŞVURU FORMU içerisinde 2.iv maddesinde belirtilen mail adresine, e-posta'nın konu kısmına “Kişisel Verilerin Korunması Kanunu Bilgi ...
- kişisel verilerin elde edilmesi ve işlenmesi hakkında aydınlatma metni
KİŞİSEL VERİLERİN ELDE EDİLMESİ VE İŞLENMESİ HAKKINDA AYDINLATMA METNİ. Acıbadem Sağlık Hizmetleri ve Ticaret A.Ş. ile EK-1'de listelenen hâkim ve bağlı ...
- Çerez Politikası - Acıbadem
Bu teknolojilerin kullanımı ve kişisel veri işleme faaliyeti başta 6698 sayılı Kişisel Verilerin Korunması Kanunu (“Kanun”) olmak üzere tabi olduğumuz mevzuata ...
- Acıbadem Sağlık Grubu
Protection of Personal DataCookie PolicyPrivacy Policy. Copyright and ... Privacy Policy · Protection of Personal Data · Cookie Policy. Download app.
- Protection of Personal Data - Acıbadem
Protection of Personal DataCookie PolicyPrivacy Policy. INFORMATION FORM ... Privacy Policy · Protection of Personal Data · Cookie Policy. Download app.
- Health Services - Acıbadem
6698 on the Protection of Personal Data and limited to the purposes specified in the Privacy Notice. Send. Frequently Viewed. Breast Cancer.
- Cookie Policy - Acıbadem
Protection of Personal DataCookie PolicyPrivacy Policy. As Acıbadem Sağlık ... Privacy Policy · Protection of Personal Data · Cookie Policy. Download app.
- Hip Replacement - Acıbadem International Joint Center
6698 on the Protection of Personal Data and limited to the purposes specified in the. Privacy Notice . I hereby consent that Acıbadem Sağlık Hizmetleri ve ...
- Premium - Acıbadem Life
Çerez Politikası Gizlilik Politikası KVKK · llms.txt Sizi Arayalım WhatsApp. Sizi Hemen Arayalım. ×. Mobil uygulamayı hemen indirin, ücretsiz üye olun. Temizle.
- Genel Cerrahi Doktorları - Acıbadem
Kişisel Verilerin Korunması; Bilgi Toplumu Hizmetleri · Bilgi Güvenliği Politikası · Enerji Politikası · Web ve Tıbbi Yayın Kurulu · İletişim; Alo Acıbadem.
- Klinik Psk EDA KALAYCIOĞLU - Acıbadem
Kayıt sırasında verdiğim kişisel verilerimin KVKK kapsamında ve Aydınlatma Metni'nde belirtilen amaçlarla işlenmesine onay veriyorum. Gönder. Canlı Destek ...
- Maternity Services - Acıbadem
6698 on the Protection of Personal Data and limited to the purposes specified in the Privacy Notice. Send. Frequently Viewed. Breast Cancer · Prostate Cancer.
- Dr.Dt. CEYDA SABANCI - Acıbadem
Privacy Policy · Protection of Personal Data · Cookie Policy. Download app. App Store'dan İndirin · Google Play'den Alın ...
- Fizyoterapist İLAYDA KURTULUŞ - Acıbadem
Çerez Politikası. Uygulamayı indirin. App Store'dan İndirin · Google Play'den Alın · AppGallery ...
- Açık Pozisyonlar - Acıbadem IK - Başvur
Hasta Hakları Koordinatörü, Hasta Hakları ve İlişkileri Koordinasyon Müdürü, Hasta Hakları ve İlişkileri Sorumlusu, Hasta Hakları ve İlişkileri Uzmanı, Hasta ...
- What is Robotic Orthopedic Surgery? - Acıbadem
Measurement, enhancement and study of patient satisfaction by Hospital Management, Patient Rights and Patient Experience departments, and; Procurement of ...
- *Diğer kutucuğunu işaretlemeniz halinde şirket ile ilişkinizi ...
... Kişisel Verilerin Korunması Kanunu'nun (“KVKK”) 11. ve 13'üncü maddeleri uyarınca yapılacak başvuruları ivedilikle (“Başvuru”), etkin ve kapsamlı bir ...
- ArmeoSpring - Acıbadem
Acıbadem Aydınlatma Metni kapsamında bilgilendirme, tanıtım ve hatırlatmalar için tarafıma. Ticari Elektronik İleti gönderilmesine onay veriyorum. Gönder.
- Doctors specialized in Treatment of Obesity - Acıbadem
... Personal Data Protection Law No. 6698 ("Law") and related legislation. Processing of Personal Data is carried out in accordance with the framework outlined ...
This control reviews indexed-search discoverability only. It does not establish that a document is current or present on the live website, and legal compliance was not verified.
Legal Check (Sectoral & Jurisdiction Legal Intelligence)
ip_estimateScore Breakdown
Top Legal Gaps
- Strengthen the public privacy notice with clearly layered purposes, legal basis, rights, transfers and retention information.
- Provide a distinct patient-facing explanation of sensitive health-data handling under the Türkiye-market transparency lens.
- Make patient rights, complaints and privacy-contact routes easy to find without conflating public transparency with verified legal compliance.
Sector-Critical Findings
Benchmark summary: Comparison covers discoverability, patient and health-data transparency, rights and complaints, policy layering, market localization, accessibility and observable implementation; global references do not import foreign legal rules or certify legal equivalence.
Evidence Ledger
Evidence scope: legal completeness and applicability. A Trust Basics PASS can confirm that a public surface was detected while this card still reports WARN for incomplete content. Indexed-search availability is assessed separately and does not override either result.
Verified Legal Topics
Evaluated Legal Criteria
Core Legal Surfaces
Consent & Implementation
Benchmark Reference Records
How this score is calculated: Legal Check combines applicable jurisdiction/market transparency (45%), sector-specific legal transparency (25%), observable implementation (15%), maturity against curated sector benchmarks (10%), and freshness/ownership signals (5%). The audit evaluates public website evidence for online-reputation and transparency purposes; it is not a legal opinion or certification.
Audit-market context: The market is taken from the country selected for the audit. If no country is selected, ALO.NET Audit estimates the market from the auditor’s IP connection. Market context guides localized comparison; it does not by itself determine the audited company’s governing law.
Benchmark corpus: Comparison uses a versioned, periodically reviewed benchmark and regulatory-reference corpus. Legal pages and guidance can change over time, so the result reflects the corpus version and evidence collected for this audit.
Engine legal-check-engine-v1.0.0 · Jurisdiction pack tr-legal-transparency-v1.0.0 · Corpus healthcare-benchmarks-2026-q3-v1
Competitive Reputation Context
Directional benchmark: For the selected focal branch, the current Google Maps review footprint is above, with 3,389 reviews compared with a qualified-peer median of 1,040. Its 4.4 rating remains above the peer median of 3.6. This branch-level comparison does not represent the complete multi-location brand. This comparison applies only to the documented Google Maps cohort and does not classify overall online reputation. Separately observed mobile PageSpeed at 45/100 may weaken patient decision confidence.
Comparable peers must match sector, business model, brand scale and market context. Each reputation platform is interpreted as its own layer; Google Maps ratings are not blended with Tripadvisor, Trustpilot, OTA, social, SERP or PageSpeed signals.
Public reputation should be framed as patient decision confidence, not popularity. Weak doctor identity, weak clinic trust signals, missing medical disclaimers, poor structured data, or thin educational content should be read as patient trust and medical decision journey risks.
Sector classification is based on bounded audited-root evidence. Each row-level observation remains separately limited by its stated crawl, provider and verification conditions.
Semantic Check
This marketing-oriented comparison examines whether homepage promise, navigation intent and conversion actions remain semantically coherent across the public website evidence collected for this audit.
Evaluated findings may contribute to Verified Checks, which is separate from the future 100-point KPI score. A Not verifiable Navigation-to-Landing Alignment is a WARN coverage state, never a failure; other unavailable, unverified and informational evidence is excluded.
The homepage primary promise names a concrete offer and supporting copy reinforces the same commercial meaning.
- Daha sağlıklı bir yarın için... — https://www.acibadem.com.tr/
- Acıbadem Sağlık Grubu, Türkiye'nin önde gelen sağlık kuruluşlarından biri olarak kaliteli sağlık hizmetleri sunmaktadır. — https://www.acibadem.com.tr/
The evaluated CTA actions align with their observable native action or destination purpose.
- Randevu Al — https://www.acibadem.com.tr/#
- Randevu Al — https://www.acibadem.com.tr/doktorlar/
- Nasıl Randevu Alınır? — https://www.acibadem.com.tr/hastane-ve-ziyaretci-rehberi/nasil-randevu-alinir/
Not verifiable: The declared page locale and footer prose could not be compared with sufficient linguistic confidence.
The live brand-search description provides substantive non-legal copy that can introduce the brand or page offer.
- Daha sağlıklı bir yarın için... · AcıbademMaslak Hastanesi · AcıbademAltunizade Hastanesi · AcıbademAtaşehir Hastanesi · AcıbademAtakent Hastanesi · AcıbademBakırköy ... — https://www.acibadem.com.tr/
Frontend Interaction Check
This interaction-oriented review examines whether public contact details and conversion controls expose usable native actions in the collected website evidence.
Source markup does not by itself prove visual clickability. A Not observed contact or CTA input is a FAIL only after accessible bounded source evidence was evaluated; browser-required, restricted and unverified observations are excluded from Verified Checks and canonical KPI scoring.
Phone contact text was not reliably observed in the bounded homepage evidence.
Email contact text was not reliably observed in the bounded homepage evidence.
Address contact text was not reliably observed in the bounded homepage evidence.
At least one primary CTA exposes a native destination or form action in source markup.
Not verifiable: Source markup cannot prove visual affordance, pointer hit testing, overlay interference, focus visibility or runtime activation.
Logo Consistency Check





Trust Basic Web Scraping
Evidence scope: audited-site observation. A green dot means the signal was detected from the audited entry point or bounded first-party evidence. It does not mean the same information was available to the indexed-search provider or that its legal completeness was verified.
Insufficient evidence for a Trust Score. The badge reports detected ten-item Trust Basics; unresolved criteria remain neutral and are not counted as failures.
Schema.org Basic Check
Google SERP Preview
Google SERP stands for Google Search Engine Results Page — the page of results shown when someone searches online for a brand, product, person, service, or related topic. It is often the very first impression a potential customer, partner, or journalist has of the searched entity. Optimizing these elements is frequently one of the highest-return SEO actions available, because it can influence click-through rate before the visitor ever lands on the website.
Source: live Google organic results captured through SerpApi engine=google. The preview uses one domain-matched item from organic_results; results can vary by query, location, country, language, device and collection time.
AI Search Readiness
This public-readiness check estimates whether the site is prepared for AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) and GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) outcomes. In this report, AI Search Readiness means the website exposes signals that help AI-driven search systems discover, interpret, trust, and cite the brand accurately.
