Select your language
First publication date not recorded.Last updated:
Run another audit with an account
Public canonical reports remain readable without an account. Create a free account for 7 days full access, or log in if you already have an account.
Algün İnşaat | İstanbul ve Düzce’de Modern Yaşam & Satılık Daire Projeleri — Property Development
algun.com.tr
See historic audits
Evidence Captured (%)Check Score (/100)

Approved audits, including the current report. Hover or focus a point for values; select it to open the report.

Audit date (UTC)

Online Reputation Audit

Executive Summary

59
59/100
Check Score
(41/69 Verified Checks)
7
7/10
Trust Basics
65/86
Evidence Captured
Oct 6, 2017
First Seen On Internet
4.5 / 5.0
Matched Listings Avg. Rating
275
Reviews Across Matched Listings
25/100
Mobile PageSpeed

Checks Passed

69 checks were evaluated within the available access and audit scope. 41 are PASS; 14 are WARN and 14 are FAIL. These counts show the results of evaluated checks, not a weighted quality score.

PASS 41WARN 14FAIL 14

Executive Strength / Risk

Strongest evaluated areaLive branded-search evidencea domain-matched live Google result was capturedJump to section
Management attentionDecision-point legal evidenceLegal Check evaluated Developer / project legal responsibility (WEAK) and Privacy notice core completeness (PARTIAL)Jump to section

Evidence coverage: 65/86. 21 eligible controls remain unverified or unavailable. Check Score reflects evaluated checks only.

(Cached evidence · captured 12 Oct 2026 UTC; live access not rechecked)

This audit provides a consolidated executive view of how a brand’s digital presence supports—or weakens—its online reputation and the value of its digital investments. It evaluates key public indicators across semantic visibility, technical performance, legal and trust signals, platform consistency, reputation strength, and sector-specific competitive context. Rather than treating these signals in isolation, the audit examines their relationships and relevant correlations with commercial performance. Its final goal is to give senior executives a clear, evidence-based basis for identifying gaps, challenging internal assumptions, prioritizing corrective action, and making better-informed digital investment decisions.

Algün İnşaat is a luxury residential development marketing high-end residences and commercial or workspace opportunities. Its website highlights Devam Eden Projelerimiz and Tamamlanan Projelerimiz. Its public location footprint includes 12 captured Google Maps listings in the selected audit market. The website links to Instagram, Facebook and LinkedIn profiles. The captured AI answer mentions the brand in response to the audited query.

Local Market

No retained verified background Nearby result is available. This audit remains available.

Maps/Nearby presentation refreshed from this audit's retained evidence on 2026-10-13T19:22:14+00:00. Original audit date, findings and scores are unchanged.

Verified Evidence Positioning Map (Nearby Peers)

The saved audit does not retain sufficient verified focal and independent peer entry-page evidence for this comparison. Nearby positioning is unavailable; no peer points or ranking are inferred.

Evidence data and provenance
ScopeRepresentative Local Market
Audited root/entityhttps://algun.com.tr/
Unit typedevelopment_project
Matched locations12
Sector control packproperty_local_positioning_v1
Selection provenanceExact physical-project identity and first-party project order.
Entry-page evidenceEntry-page evidence could not be verified from the available safe-fetch evidence.
Competitor probingNot started because the selected physical unit or its first-party entry could not be verified.

Local Market is unavailable for this snapshot. ALO.NET Audited Cohort is the fallback.

ALO.NET Audited Cohort: Compatible saved full audits. This population and its historical axes are separate from Local Market web probes.

The public decision journey is uneven: customer-facing governance creates the clearest controllable gap, while search-to-enquiry journey clarity supplies the strongest verified reassurance. Taken together, the evidence suggests that prospective buyers can encounter credible public proof but still receive an avoidably weak handoff toward project enquiry action. Management can therefore protect the established reputation signal while tightening the point where discovery should become action. see details ↓

Observed weakness: Customer-facing governance is the selected weakness. The evaluated disclosures were: Developer / project legal responsibility was weak and Privacy notice core completeness was incomplete. This high-confidence governance evidence is bounded to the buyer decision point; it neither proves legal insufficiency nor predicts a buyer complaint or dispute. see details ↓

Observed strength: Search-to-enquiry journey clarity is the selected strength. The audited entry point presented usable publisher search copy. This is high-confidence decision-journey evidence for the search-to-enquiry journey; it does not establish the live Google result, prospective buyers' response, conversion or revenue. see details ↓

Management Decision: Management should assign a named owner and review date to customer-facing governance, then use a relevant first-party journey indicator to test whether the exposure is reduced. It should preserve search-to-enquiry journey clarity as a managed public strength while keeping the conclusion within the cited confidence, cohort and measurement limits. see details ↓

Verified Evidence Positioning (Random Similar Comparable Brands)Comparison scope: Developer portfolio · Developer company · Regional · mixed verified brand scales. Compatible saved ALO.NET Audit reports only; separate from Google Maps Comparable Peers.3 of 5 qualified comparable audits were available. No weaker peers were added.Younef.com.trsinpas.com.trsinpasgyo.com
BrandVerified ChecksShared passes
You41/6918/27
nef.com.tr28/5913/27
sinpas.com.tr32/5516/27
sinpasgyo.com25/5314/27
X: Verified Checks, 0-100 (this audit's eligible-control scale is planned to expand toward 100). Y: verified passes across 27 shared evaluated controls, shown as a count, not a percent. Marker size scales with Verified Checks; legend order and color are identity-only, not a leaderboard.

Verified Evidence Positioning Analysis: Across 27 controls shared by 4 saved audits, the audited brand passes 18. Its broader result is 41/69 Verified Checks. Its shared-control result meets or exceeds the strongest captured peer result. Review the underlying shared-control gaps before interpreting differences in total coverage. This selected comparison is retained evidence, not a local-market rank or a measure of reputation or commercial performance.

Supporting Market Evidence: Within the Türkiye audit market, Google Maps identified 12 qualified location listings associated with the audited entity. This is market-bounded evidence, not a complete worldwide physical footprint. see details ↓

customer-facing governance: Observed evidence: Legal Check evaluated Developer / project legal responsibility was weak and Privacy notice core completeness was incomplete. Why management should care: Management may be less able to reconstruct the responsible-entity statement and the relevant buyer-facing disclosure presented at the project enquiry, reservation or buyer-data decision point. see details ↓

search-to-enquiry journey clarity: Observed evidence: A domain-matched live Google result was captured. Management value: The first search interaction may not communicate the project proposition or enquiry next step clearly enough for buyers. The public signal should be protected, but it is not proof of a commercial outcome. see details ↓

machine-readable business clarity: Observed evidence: Structured entity data was detected. Management value: Search platforms may receive an incomplete relationship between the developer, project, sales office and offer. The public signal should be protected, but it is not proof of a commercial outcome. see details ↓

Audit Scope: Audit market: Türkiye. The market was estimated from the auditor's IP connection at submission. Google SERP and Google Maps evidence is limited to this market, including for global brands; the audit does not automatically classify the entity as global or regional. see details ↓

90 days Priorities

  1. What proposition and next step should a buyer see at the search decision point, and who owns its consistency? see details ↓
  2. What evidence will demonstrate that the selected corrective action changed the measured outcome? see details ↓
  3. Do Brand, Digital and Operations agree on the canonical entity, location and offer relationships that public platforms should understand? see details ↓

90-Day Priority Actions

  1. Improve the measured publisher-controlled search metadata, then recheck.Measured evidence supports a bounded remediation; ranking uses the recorded score gap, relevance weight, confidence and actionability.HighActionable within 90 days
  2. Investigate and remediate measured page-performance friction, then remeasure.Measured evidence supports a bounded remediation; ranking uses the recorded score gap, relevance weight, confidence and actionability.MediumActionable within 90 days
  3. Correct the verified identity inconsistency on the evidenced assets.Measured evidence supports a bounded remediation; ranking uses the recorded score gap, relevance weight, confidence and actionability.MediumActionable within 90 days

Google PageSpeed/SEO — algun.com.tr

Page speed shapes first impressions before a single word is read. A low Performance score — especially on mobile — means visitors leave before engaging. Google uses Core Web Vitals as a ranking signal, so poor speed hurts discoverability. The SEO score here reflects technical crawlability only, not full SEO strength. Accessibility measures inclusivity. Best Practices flags security and standards compliance. Together, these reveal how seriously the digital asset is maintained.

Mobile
PSI lab run: 2026-10-12T12:21:08.285Z UTC
Mobile screenshot
25
Performance
90
Accessibility
73
Best Practices
75
SEO
Desktop
PSI lab run: 2026-10-12T12:21:08.463Z UTC
Desktop screenshot
42
Performance
90
Accessibility
73
Best Practices
75
SEO
Google PageSpeed SEO score has been multiplied by 0.75. Why?Google PageSpeed Insights SEO score is not a real SEO score; it is a limited technical crawlability and on-page hygiene check only.  For deep SEO/AIO analysis, please contact info@alo.net.
Evidence details ▾
FAIL Largest contentful paint (lab)

Mobile: FAIL (9827.2708298598 ms); Desktop: WARN (2522.2834880242 ms). Lighthouse lab measurement of the tested entry; not field Core Web Vitals.

PASS Layout stability (lab)

Mobile: PASS (0 unitless); Desktop: PASS (0.011078205792843 unitless). Lighthouse lab measurement of the tested entry; not field Core Web Vitals.

FAIL Blocking responsiveness proxy (lab)

Mobile: FAIL (5606.5 ms); Desktop: FAIL (2380 ms). Lab main-thread blocking proxy; not field INP or verified real-user responsiveness.

FAIL Accessible button names

Mobile: FAIL; Desktop: FAIL. Automated tested-page markup finding; not whole-site accessibility or WCAG compliance.

PASS Form input labels

Mobile: PASS; Desktop: PASS. Automated tested-page markup finding; not whole-site accessibility or WCAG compliance.

PASS Entry-page indexing directives

Mobile: PASS; Desktop: PASS. Tested entry indexing directives only; no proof of search inclusion, robots access or whole-site crawlability. Intentional noindex needs publisher review.

Maps/Nearby presentation refreshed from this audit's retained evidence on 2026-10-13T19:22:14+00:00. Original audit date, findings and scores are unchanged.

Google Maps Reviews

Retained Google Places source records are shown below with their qualification limits. These records do not contribute to the audited-unit aggregate or the measured Nearby comparison.

  • Algün İnşaat Düzce Satış Ofisi — Website: https://algun.com.tr/; Google rating: 4.6; reviews: 20; recorded type: general contractor. The record has not passed the operating-unit identity and eligibility checks.
  • ALGÜN ICON — Website: https://icon.algun.com.tr/; Google rating: unavailable; reviews: unavailable; recorded type: association or organization. The record has not passed the operating-unit identity and eligibility checks.
  • Algün Residence — Website: https://algun.com.tr/; Google rating: unavailable; reviews: unavailable; recorded type: general contractor. The record has not passed the operating-unit identity and eligibility checks.
  • ALGÜN CENTRUM — Website: https://centrum.algun.com.tr/; Google rating: unavailable; reviews: unavailable; recorded type: association or organization. The record has not passed the operating-unit identity and eligibility checks.
  • Algün Statü — Website: https://statu.algun.com.tr/; Google rating: unavailable; reviews: unavailable; recorded type: housing complex. The record has not passed the operating-unit identity and eligibility checks.
  • Algün Suits — Website: https://suits.algun.com.tr/; Google rating: unavailable; reviews: unavailable; recorded type: housing complex. The record has not passed the operating-unit identity and eligibility checks.
The results below are limited to the Türkiye audit market. This is market-biased Google Maps evidence, not a complete worldwide footprint and not an automatic global/regional brand classification.
Matched listings average rating: 4.4 (pass). 10 Maps matches found for www.algun.com.tr
280
Reviews Across Matched Listings
4.4 ★★★★☆
Matched Listings Avg. Rating
10
Maps Matches
4.8 ★★★★★ (156 reviews)
3.8 ★★★★☆ (86 reviews)
4.3 ★★★★☆ (3 reviews)
5.0 ★★★★★ (1 reviews)
4.5 ★★★★★ (6 reviews)

Competitive Google Maps Rating vs Comparable Peers

Directional: below peer median

Competitive Google Maps peer analysis - not a generic score.

0thAudited percentile
-0.2Rating gap vs peer median
8 | LowPeer sample | confidence

The current bounded sample directionally places the audited brand's Google rating below the qualified peer distribution; this is not a decision-grade market classification.

8 comparable Google Maps peers | Low sample confidence | cohort validity: limited | current rating distribution | ALO.NET methodology | calculated 2026-10-12 | property developer/company candidates in the bounded market area around the verified portfolio footprint | Attempted radii: 30 km.

Why it matters: Comparable Peers are Google Maps property listings from the bounded 5 km, 15 km and 30 km widening policy, returned by Turkish and English sale-intent queries, then passed type, brand, operating-status and First Seen gates. This is directional active-sale candidate evidence, not live inventory verification.

Audited Brand: The marker represents the focal audited listing. It is the focal Google Maps listing selected by the audit evidence.

Competitive Google Maps Review Volume vs Comparable Peers

Directional: above peer market

Current review footprint - not Review Momentum and not age-normalized.

90thAudited percentile
4.1xReview count vs peer median
10 | MediumPeer sample | confidence

The current bounded sample directionally places the audited listing's Google Maps review footprint above the qualified peer distribution; this is not a decision-grade market classification.

10 comparable Google Maps peers | Medium sample confidence | cohort validity: limited | current raw review-count distribution | ALO.NET methodology | calculated 2026-10-12 | property developer/company candidates in the bounded market area around the verified portfolio footprint | Attempted radii: 30 km.

Competitive Reputation Position

Directional: review volume above median

Two directional Google Maps sample percentiles shown together - not a synthetic score or market classification.

Audited Brand · audited peer position88thREVIEW VOLUME PERCENTILE0thGOOGLE RATING PERCENTILEPEER MEDIANRATING ABOVE · VOLUME BELOWBOTH ABOVE SAMPLE MEDIANBOTH BELOW SAMPLE MEDIANVOLUME ABOVE · RATING BELOW01.252.53.7550448Review Volume scale (logarithmic)Google RatingRedstone Exper Gayrimenkul - Karasu: Rating 5.0, Review Volume 4481Balcıoğlu Group - Kocaali Emlak, Kocaali inşaat: Rating 5.0, Review Volume 1042Flavor Group Gayrimenkul: Rating 4.9, Review Volume 743Dündar Gayrimenkul: Rating 4.9, Review Volume 594Ref Cihan Yapı İnşaat: Rating 5.0, Review Volume 415Kocaali Emlak İnşaat - kocaaliemlakinsaat.com: Rating 5.0, Review Volume 366SMART GAYRİMENKUL İNŞAAT YAPI TAAHHÜT: Rating 5.0, Review Volume 237Fatenil İnşaat San.Tic.Ltd.Şti: Rating 4.9, Review Volume 188Audited: Rating 4.8, Review Volume 156A

Bubbles prioritize the highest-review paired peers; all paired peers remain in both axis statistics.

BrandRatingReviews
Redstone Exper Gayrimenkul - Karasu5.0448
Balcıoğlu Group - Kocaali Emlak, Kocaali inşaat5.0104
Flavor Group Gayrimenkul4.974
Dündar Gayrimenkul4.959
BrandRatingReviews
Ref Cihan Yapı İnşaat5.041
Kocaali Emlak İnşaat - kocaaliemlakinsaat.com5.036
SMART GAYRİMENKUL İNŞAAT YAPI TAAHHÜT5.023
Fatenil İnşaat San.Tic.Ltd.Şti4.918

Competitive read: The current bounded sample places review volume above and rating below its median; no rating-risk label is inferred.

8 paired comparable Google Maps peers | Medium sample confidence | cohort validity: limited | shared persisted Rating ∩ Review Volume peer-ID denominator | median crosshair = paired-cohort 50th percentile | ALO.NET methodology | calculated 2026-10-12 | Attempted radii: 30 km.

Evidence coverage dashboard

ALO.NET KPI Profile

Six-pillar evidence coverage and status distribution. Verified Checks remains separate and no KPI maturity score is inferred.

Score withheld
PASSWARNFAILUnverifiedUnavailableInformational

Where is verified KPI evidence concentrated?

Raw deterministic evidence states are compared across all six approved pillars. Bar length is a count, not maturity or a KPI score.

Focus, hover or tap a chart value for exact evidence details.
Canonical findings and evidence ownership

Verified capabilities and gaps retain their evidence scope. Source observations do not prove rendered interaction. Findings are ordered by status and control ID; commercial impact is not ranked.

Online Discoverability

  • Verified capability: Facebook profile linkage · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified capability: Instagram profile linkage · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified capability: LinkedIn profile linkage · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified capability: YouTube profile linkage · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified capability: Entry-page indexing directives · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface — Mobile: PASS; Desktop: PASS. Tested entry indexing directives only; no proof of search inclusion, robots access or whole-site crawlability. Intentional noindex needs publisher review.
  • Verified capability: Search result language consistency · PASS · Platform evidence
  • Verified gap: Publisher description quality · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: Publisher title quality · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: Pinterest profile linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: TikTok profile linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: X profile linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: Declared location linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence

Reputation & Trust

  • Verified capability: Blocklist exposure · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified capability: SPF policy · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified capability: Facebook public profile presence · PASS · Platform evidence
  • Verified capability: Instagram public profile presence · PASS · Platform evidence
  • Verified capability: LinkedIn public profile presence · PASS · Platform evidence
  • Verified capability: YouTube public profile presence · PASS · Platform evidence
  • Verified capability: Instagram visual identity · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified capability: YouTube visual identity · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified capability: Comparable rating position · PASS · Platform evidence
  • Verified capability: Matched listing rating · PASS · Platform evidence
  • Verified capability: About identity evidence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified capability: Secure connection · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified capability: Site icon presence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: X public profile presence · FAIL · Platform evidence
  • Verified gap: Cross-channel visual identity · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: LinkedIn visual identity · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: Facebook visual identity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: Content freshness evidence · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: DMARC policy · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: X visual identity · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface

Website Experience & Performance

  • Verified capability: Form input labels · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface — Mobile: PASS; Desktop: PASS. Automated tested-page markup finding; not whole-site accessibility or WCAG compliance.
  • Verified capability: Layout stability (lab) · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface — Mobile: PASS (0 unitless); Desktop: PASS (0.011078205792843 unitless). Lighthouse lab measurement of the tested entry; not field Core Web Vitals.
  • Verified capability: Image format hygiene · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified capability: Responsive viewport declaration · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: Accessible button names · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface — Mobile: FAIL; Desktop: FAIL. Automated tested-page markup finding; not whole-site accessibility or WCAG compliance.
  • Verified gap: Accessible link names · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface — Mobile: FAIL; Desktop: FAIL. Automated tested-page markup finding; not whole-site accessibility or WCAG compliance.
  • Verified gap: Blocking responsiveness proxy (lab) · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface — Mobile: FAIL (5606.5 ms); Desktop: FAIL (2380 ms). Lab main-thread blocking proxy; not field INP or verified real-user responsiveness.
  • Verified gap: Desktop lab performance · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: Largest contentful paint (lab) · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface — Mobile: FAIL (9827.2708298598 ms); Desktop: WARN (2522.2834880242 ms). Lighthouse lab measurement of the tested entry; not field Core Web Vitals.
  • Verified gap: Mobile lab performance · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: Accessibility markup basics · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface

Measurement & Conversion Readiness

  • Verified capability: Analytics script declaration · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface — Explicit declaration detected in inspected entry source. Presence does not establish execution, events, conversions or form delivery.
  • Verified capability: Tag manager declaration · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface — Explicit declaration detected in inspected entry source. Presence does not establish execution, events, conversions or form delivery.
  • Verified capability: Contact path evidence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: Directions markup actionability · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: Email markup actionability · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: Rendered interaction evidence · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Source observation: Phone markup actionability · INFORMATIONAL · Publisher-controlled surface — The observed phone value has a matching native action in source markup.
  • Source observation: Primary CTA markup · INFORMATIONAL · Publisher-controlled surface — At least one primary CTA exposes a native destination or form action in source markup.

Semantic & AI Readiness

  • Verified capability: Brand Mentioned · PASS · Platform evidence
  • Verified capability: Citation-free Mention · PASS · Platform evidence
  • Verified capability: Own Domain Exposed · PASS · Platform evidence
  • Verified capability: Search / Fan-out Observed · PASS · Platform evidence
  • Verified capability: Primary offer clarity · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified capability: Local business structured identity · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified capability: Breadcrumb structured data · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified capability: Organization structured identity · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: Brand Recommended · FAIL · Platform evidence
  • Verified gap: Conversion intent alignment · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: Navigation intent alignment · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: Product or service structured identity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: Review structured data · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: Search result message relevance · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
  • Evidence gap: Query / Page Match · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
  • Evidence gap: Locale content coherence · UNAVAILABLE · Publisher-controlled surface

Legal & Privacy Governance

  • Verified capability: Benchmark legal quality · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified capability: Implementation legal quality · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified capability: Cookie notice presence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified capability: Privacy policy presence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: Sector legal quality · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: Freshness legal quality · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: Jurisdiction legal quality · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: Developer / Project Legal Identity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: On-site Legal Discoverability & Freshness · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: Privacy / Data Protection · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: Cookie & Consent · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: Lead & Form Transparency · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: Property Marketing Disclosures · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: Rights / Privacy Contact · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: Cookie policy indexed discoverability · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
  • Evidence gap: Privacy & data protection indexed discoverability · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
  • Evidence gap: Project legal disclaimer indexed discoverability · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
  • Evidence gap: Sales & reservation terms indexed discoverability · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
  • Evidence gap: Terms presence · UNAVAILABLE · Publisher-controlled surface

How do Mobile and Desktop Lighthouse results compare?

This compares the stored Lighthouse category results by device; the four categories are not averaged into a new score.

How is Google Maps review volume distributed across matched locations?

Bar length represents review volume only; rating is shown separately in labels and details.

Percentiles withheld: one mature domain-matched focal branch was not explicitly established.

Accessible KPI evidence table
ALO.NET KPI Profile evidence coverage and status distribution
PillarEvaluated / applicablePASSWARNFAILUnverifiedUnavailableEvidence coverageConfidence
Online Discoverability8 / 12620408 of 12 applicable controls evaluatedRetained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control
Reputation & Trust18 / 2013232018 of 20 applicable controls evaluatedRetained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control
Website Experience & Performance11 / 114160011 of 11 applicable controls evaluatedRetained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control
Measurement & Conversion Readiness5 / 8302105 of 8 applicable controls evaluatedRetained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control
Semantic & AI Readiness13 / 168412113 of 16 applicable controls evaluatedRetained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control
Legal & Privacy Governance10 / 194518110 of 19 applicable controls evaluatedRetained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control
Accessible PageSpeed data table
Stored PageSpeed device comparison
DevicePerformanceAccessibilityBest PracticesSEOSource collection time
Mobile2590731002026-10-12T12:21:08.285Z
Desktop4290731002026-10-12T12:21:08.463Z
Accessible Maps location data table
Matched Google Maps location evidence
LocationReviewsRatingFocal status
Algün İnşaat1564.8Matched location
Algün City863.8Matched location
Algün Prime Ataşehir174.8Matched location
Algün Adress64.5Matched location
Algün Ünicenter43.8Matched location
Algün Premium34.3Matched location
Algün Private25.0Matched location
ALGÜN GARDEN15.0Matched location
ALGÜN ICON0UnavailableMatched location
ALGÜN CENTRUM0UnavailableMatched location
Algün Statü0UnavailableMatched location
Algün Suits0UnavailableMatched location

Measurement & Conversion Readiness

Evidence details ▾
PASS Analytics script declaration

Explicit declaration detected in inspected entry source. Presence does not establish execution, events, conversions or form delivery.

PASS Tag manager declaration

Explicit declaration detected in inspected entry source. Presence does not establish execution, events, conversions or form delivery.

Indexed policy evidence

Google-Indexed Legal Discoverability

Indexed-search discoverability only. This is separate from audited-site presence in Trust Basics and content completeness in Legal Check.

Indexed-search evidence was unavailable for this audit

Indexed-search evidence was unavailable for this audit; the rest of the report is unaffected.

Sector: Property DevelopmentEvaluated locales: TRIndexed-source readiness: readyKPI treatment: Score withheld
Policy conceptTR
Privacy & data protectionINDEXED SEARCH UNAVAILABLE
Cookie policyINDEXED SEARCH UNAVAILABLE
Sales & reservation termsINDEXED SEARCH UNAVAILABLE
Project legal disclaimerINDEXED SEARCH UNAVAILABLE
Presentationunknown
Document scopeUnknown
Locale gapsNo cross-locale gap established

This control reviews indexed-search discoverability only. It does not establish that a document is current or present on the live website, and legal compliance was not verified.

Competitive Reputation Context

Sector
Property Development
Business Model
Developer company
Brand Scale
Regional

Directional benchmark: For the selected focal branch, the current Google Maps review footprint is above, with 156 reviews compared with a qualified-peer median of 39. Its 4.8 rating is below the peer median of 5.0. This branch-level comparison does not represent the complete multi-location brand. This comparison applies only to the documented Google Maps cohort and does not classify overall online reputation. Separately observed mobile PageSpeed at 25/100 may weaken buyer confidence.

Comparable peers must match sector, business model, brand scale and market context. Each reputation platform is interpreted as its own layer; Google Maps ratings are not blended with Tripadvisor, Trustpilot, OTA, social, SERP or PageSpeed signals.

Sector and business model assignment
Confidence: confirmed_public_signal · Peer interpretation: not_comparable
Manual assignment is preferred when the audited brand operates in a complex category. Automatic detection is treated as detected_but_weak unless supported by machine-readable public signals.
Google Maps peer layer
Confidence: confirmed_public_signal · Peer interpretation: around_peer_median
Google Maps peer comparison is based only on comparable Google Maps places and is not mixed with Tripadvisor, Trustpilot, OTA, or other platform scores.
Mobile lead / decision experience
Confidence: detected_but_weak · Peer interpretation: not_comparable
Mobile PageSpeed is 25/100 under automated audit conditions. In this sector, mobile performance affects lead quality and buyer confidence.
Entity and structured-data clarity
Confidence: confirmed_public_signal · Peer interpretation: not_comparable
Machine-readable structured data was detected and can help search engines understand the entity, locations, people or services.
Foundational trust maturity
Confidence: needs_manual_verification · Peer interpretation: not_comparable
Trust Basics: 7/10; unresolved criteria require further verification and were not treated as failures.

Public digital trust signals affect perceived purchase risk. Weak project transparency, poor company credibility, unclear location/project information, weak social proof, or a poor mobile lead experience should be read as buyer-confidence risk, not only marketing weakness.

Sector classification is based on bounded audited-root evidence. Each row-level observation remains separately limited by its stated crawl, provider and verification conditions.

Semantic Check

(Cached evidence · captured 12 Oct 2026 UTC; live access not rechecked)

This marketing-oriented comparison examines whether homepage promise, navigation intent and conversion actions remain semantically coherent across the public website evidence collected for this audit.

Evaluated findings may contribute to Verified Checks, which is separate from the future 100-point KPI score. A Not verifiable Navigation-to-Landing Alignment is a WARN coverage state, never a failure; other unavailable, unverified and informational evidence is excluded.

Primary Offer Clarity
Clear

The homepage primary promise names a concrete offer and supporting copy reinforces the same commercial meaning.

  • Rakamlarla Algün — https://algun.com.tr/
  • Algün İnşaat, Düzce ve İstanbul’da modern mimariyle güvenli yaşam alanları geliştiriyor. Lüks konut projeleriyle şehirlerin geleceğini şekillendiren lider inşaat markası. — https://algun.com.tr/
Navigation Destination Alignment
Not verifiable

Destination verification unavailable: Navigation destinations could not be compared from the bounded evidence set.

  • İstanbul Projeleri — https://algun.com.tr/projeler/#istanbul-projeleri
  • Devam Eden Projeler — https://algun.com.tr/projeler/#devam-eden-projeler
  • Tamamlanan Projeler — https://algun.com.tr/projeler/#tamamlanan-projeler
CTA-to-Destination Alignment
Mixed evidence

The phone CTA is actionable, but its tel: target is domestic-only and does not expose an international dialing prefix.

  • 444 7 281 — tel:444 7 281
Locale-to-Content Coherence
Not verifiable

Not verifiable: The declared page locale and footer prose could not be compared with sufficient linguistic confidence.

  • ProjelerGaleriHakkımızdaİletişim E-Bülten Gelişmelerden Haberdar Olun! Lütfen geçerli bir e-posta hesabı giriniz! Sosyal Medyada Bizi Takip Edin! Devam Eden Projeler Algün Premi̇um Algün Royal Algün Nefes Algün Nova Algün Pri̇vate Algün Effect Algün Effect 2 Algün Elegance Algün Ataşehi̇r Tamamlanan Projeler Algün Sui̇ — https://algun.com.tr/
Live SERP Description Marketing Relevance
Marketing-relevant

The live brand-search description provides substantive non-legal copy that can introduce the brand or page offer.

  • Algün İnşaat, Düzce'de modern mimariyle inşa ettiği güvenli konutlarda satılık daire seçenekleri sunarak yatırımcılara uzun vadeli değer ve yaşam kalitesi ... — https://algun.com.tr/duzce-satilik-daire-guvenli-yapilar-modern-mimari-kalici-deger/
Evidence scope: 60 internal candidates discovered; 2 bounded destination pages fetched.

Frontend Interaction Check

This interaction-oriented review examines whether public contact details and conversion controls expose usable native actions in the collected website evidence.

Source markup does not by itself prove visual clickability. A Not observed contact or CTA input is a FAIL only after accessible bounded source evidence was evaluated; browser-required, restricted and unverified observations are excluded from Verified Checks and canonical KPI scoring.

Phone Actionability
Actionable in markup

The observed phone value has a matching native action in source markup.

Email Actionability
Not observed

Email contact text was not reliably observed in the bounded homepage evidence.

Address-to-Directions Actionability
Not observed

Address contact text was not reliably observed in the bounded homepage evidence.

CTA (Call-To-Action) Markup Actionability
Native action

At least one primary CTA exposes a native destination or form action in source markup.

Rendered Interaction Evidence
Browser verification required

Not verifiable: Source markup cannot prove visual affordance, pointer hit testing, overlay interference, focus visibility or runtime activation.

Collected: 2026-10-12T12:21:24+00:00

Social Presence Signals

This section checks whether the brand's public social profiles are visibly connected to the audited domain. Instagram profile images are checked through Meta Business Discovery when a valid Page Access Token is available. Profiles discovered by brand name are included only when they are verified against the audited domain.

Instagram
Profile found: Yes
Website/domain match: Match
24.4K
Followers
96
Posts
Interpretation: Instagram appears publicly visible and aligned with the audited domain.
X
Profile found: No
Profile URL: Not detected
Website/domain match: Not publicly visible
Interpretation: X was not detected on the audited website as a public profile asset.
Facebook
Profile found: Yes
Website/domain match: Match
Interpretation: Facebook appears publicly visible and aligned with the audited domain.
YouTube
Profile found: Yes
Website/domain match: Match
Interpretation: YouTube appears publicly visible and aligned with the audited domain.
YouTube
Profile found: Yes
Website/domain match: Match
Interpretation: YouTube appears publicly visible and aligned with the audited domain.
LinkedIn
Profile found: Yes
Website/domain match: Match
Interpretation: LinkedIn appears publicly visible and aligned with the audited domain.
LinkedIn
Profile found: Yes
Website/domain match: Match
Interpretation: LinkedIn appears publicly visible and aligned with the audited domain.
LinkedIn
Profile found: Yes
Website/domain match: Match
Interpretation: LinkedIn appears publicly visible and aligned with the audited domain.

Logo Consistency Check

Favicon / Site IconFavicon / Site Icon
Brand logos retrieved for 7 of 8 checked channels, but the retrieved social-channel logos do not match the website logo or verified website icon / brand mark. Some platforms block automated logo access. This cross-channel inconsistency can weaken brand recognition and negatively affect online reputation. 1 social profile logo has very low digital image quality.
Facebook logo
Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/alguninsaat(logo differs from the website logo and icon family)
Digital image quality: Limited source resolution (200×200 px) may reduce digital sharpness.
Instagram profile image/avatar evidence
Instagram Profile Image/Avatar Evidence
https://www.instagram.com/alguninsaat/(logo differs from the website logo and icon family)
Source: meta_business_discovery; username: @alguninsaat; Meta HTTP: 200; Graph code: n/a; cache age: 0s
Profile image/avatar evidence is not guaranteed to be the brand logo.
Digital image quality: Image quality is suitable for digital profile use.
LinkedIn logo
LinkedIn
Digital image quality: Very low source resolution (16×16 px) can appear blurred or pixelated.
YouTube logo
YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCc5iNdXXHNDG_dxRi3nmZZQ(logo differs from the website logo and icon family)
Digital image quality: Image quality is suitable for digital profile use.
YouTube logo
YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/@alguncomtr(logo differs from the website logo and icon family)
Digital image quality: Image quality is suitable for digital profile use.
LinkedIn
https://www.linkedin.com/company/alguninsaat/(logo not retrievable — platform blocks automated access)
Digital image quality: Profile image quality was not evaluated because no verified image evidence was available.
LinkedIn logo
LinkedIn
https://www.linkedin.com/company/alg%2525C3%2525BCn/(logo differs from the website logo and icon family)
Digital image quality: Limited source resolution (200×200 px) may reduce digital sharpness.
Your Website Favicon

PASS — A favicon was detected in the audited website markup. Its image was not retained for visual comparison.

Retained favicon detection
Favicon / Site Icon
Favicon or site icon detected — reinforces brand identity in browser tabs and bookmarks.
Why it matters: A favicon strengthens brand recognition in the browser tab and bookmarks; its absence signals incomplete website setup to visitors.

Trust Basic Web Scraping

7/10
Trust Basics
(Cached evidence · captured 12 Oct 2026 UTC; live access not rechecked)

Evidence scope: audited-site observation. A green dot means the signal was detected from the audited entry point or bounded first-party evidence. It does not mean the same information was available to the indexed-search provider or that its legal completeness was verified.

Insufficient evidence for a Trust Score. The badge reports detected ten-item Trust Basics; unresolved criteria remain neutral and are not counted as failures.

About Page
About page detected (https://algun.com.tr/hakkimizda) — provides a corporate trust signal to visitors.
Why it matters: Visitors and search engines use the About page to verify the legitimacy of a business; its absence reduces trust and conversion.
Contact Page
Detected (https://algun.com.tr/iletisim) through bounded shared first-party evidence.
Why it matters: A reachable business is a trustworthy business; Google also uses contact signals as a local relevance and E-E-A-T factor (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness).
Privacy Policy
Audited-site presence: privacy or data-protection information was detected. This does not establish Google-indexed visibility or legal completeness.
Why it matters: This Trust Basics control observes audited-site presence only. Google-indexed visibility and legal completeness are reported separately.
Terms of Use
Insufficient source evidence — this criterion could not be verified from the bounded first-party evidence collected during the audit.
Why it matters: This Trust Basics control checks generic site-terms presence only; transaction-specific terms and indexed-search discoverability are separate checks.
Mobile Responsive Design
Viewport meta tag present — site appears to meet mobile-responsive standards.
Why it matters: Over 60% of web traffic is mobile; Google uses mobile-first indexing, so non-responsive sites rank lower and lose visitors.
Image Format Quality
63% of images use modern formats (WebP/AVIF). WebP: 58 · AVIF: 0 · JPG/JPEG: 12 · PNG: 22 · Logo SVG not found
Why it matters: Modern image formats reduce page weight by 25–50% and maybe even more.
Constant Quality — Content Freshness
Last content update: Oct 6, 2025 (372 days ago) — content may be stale; a regular publishing schedule is recommended.
Why it matters: Search engines favour regularly updated sites; stale content signals neglect and reduces crawl frequency and rankings.
Constant Acceptance — Accessibility (a11y)
Accessibility signals weak or missing. ARIA attributes: 0 · Lang attribute: present · Image alt coverage: 100%
Why it matters: Accessible sites reach 15% more users (including those with disabilities), avoid legal risk (ADA/EAA), and earn better Core Web Vitals signals from Google.
HTTPS / Secure Connection
Website is served over HTTPS — encrypted connection protects visitors and earns the browser padlock.
Why it matters: HTTPS is a confirmed Google ranking factor; browsers display security warnings on HTTP sites, causing visitors to abandon immediately.
Automated Client Reachability
A standard GET request and a lightweight automated HEAD probe both succeeded — no automated-client compatibility issue was detected.
Why it matters: Some legacy servers or WAFs block non-browser HTTP methods or automated user agents while still serving real visitors and search engines normally; this is verified sub-evidence for the HTTPS/Secure Connection control, not a separate scored control.

Schema.org Basic Check

(Cached evidence · captured 12 Oct 2026 UTC; live access not rechecked)
Organization Schema
Organization schema or a valid subtype was detected — business identity is communicated to search engines.
Why it matters: Organization structured data helps search engines understand the entity. Detection does not guarantee a Knowledge Panel or a particular branded-search presentation.
LocalBusiness Schema
LocalBusiness schema present — strong local SEO signals.
Why it matters: LocalBusiness schema enables Google Maps rich results and improves visibility in "near me" searches.
Product / Service Schema
Product/Service schema not found — sites offering services or products are missing rich snippet opportunities.
Why it matters: Product schema enables price, availability, and review stars in SERP, increasing click-through rates significantly.
Review / AggregateRating Schema
Review schema not found — sites with customer reviews have an opportunity to show star snippets in search results.
Why it matters: Star ratings in SERP increase click-through rates by up to 35% compared to plain listings.
BreadcrumbList Schema
BreadcrumbList schema present — breadcrumb navigation is shown in Google SERP.
Why it matters: Breadcrumbs in SERP improve user understanding of site structure and modestly improve click-through rates.
Detected schema types: WebPage, ReadAction, BreadcrumbList, ListItem, WebSite, SearchAction, EntryPoint, PropertyValueSpecification, Organization, LocalBusiness, PostalAddress, ContactPoint, GeoCoordinates, OpeningHoursSpecification

Google SERP Preview

Title / description language consistency

Google SERP stands for Google Search Engine Results Page — the page of results shown when someone searches online for a brand, product, person, service, or related topic. It is often the very first impression a potential customer, partner, or journalist has of the searched entity. Optimizing these elements is frequently one of the highest-return SEO actions available, because it can influence click-through rate before the visitor ever lands on the website.

Source: captured Google organic results for the recorded query. The primary preview requires a URL matching the audited entry or its root locale; other domain pages are disclosed separately.

No audited-entry result was captured in this query. The other domain page below is not the brand homepage preview.

Audited publisher metadata · not captured Google result copy

https://algun.com.tr
Algün Construction | Modern Living & Apartment Projects for Sale in Istanbul and Düzce
Algün Construction develops safe living spaces with modern architecture in Düzce and Istanbul. It is a leading construction brand shaping the future of cities with its luxury residential projects.
Other captured domain page · not the audited entry
algun.com.tr/duzce-satilik-daire-guvenli-yapilar-modern-mimari-kalici-deger
Düzce Satılık Daire ve Konut Projeleri
Algün İnşaat, Düzce'de modern mimariyle inşa ettiği güvenli konutlarda satılık daire seçenekleri sunarak yatırımcılara uzun vadeli değer ve yaşam kalitesi ...
https://algun.com.tr/basinda-biz/algun-insaat-duzcedeki-projeleri-icin-kampanya-baslatti/
Algün Construction has launched a campaign for its projects in Düzce.
ISTANBUL (AA) – Algün Construction is offering a new interest-free, 60-month payment plan for its ongoing projects in Düzce, which are nearing completion.
https://algun.com.tr/blog/
Blog
"Stay informed about the construction industry, modern living projects, and innovations with Algün Blog. Click now for the latest content."
https://algun.com.tr/basinda-biz/algun-nova-yuzde-35-pesinatla-satista/
Algün Nova is on sale with a 35% down payment.
The project offers 1+1, 2+1 and 3+1 apartment options. 1+1 apartments have a usable area of ​​44 square meters. 2+1 apartments are 86 square meters...
Site Title
Title tag needs attention. Length: 74 characters — too long, may be truncated in SERP (ideal: 30–60 characters).
Why it matters: The title tag is the single most visible element in SERP; getting length and keyword placement right is the easiest SEO win.
Meta Description
Meta description present but needs optimisation. Length: 170 characters — long, may be truncated in SERP (ideal: 120–160 characters). Google may generate a snippet from page content when the meta description is too short — write a specific 120–160 character description to take control of how the brand appears in search results.
Why it matters: A well-written meta description acts as ad copy in SERP; it directly influences click-through rate even though it is not a direct ranking factor.
Structured Data Detected
Publisher JSON-LD detected: WebPage, ReadAction, BreadcrumbList, ListItem, WebSite, SearchAction, EntryPoint, PropertyValueSpecification, Organization, LocalBusiness, PostalAddress, ContactPoint, GeoCoordinates, OpeningHoursSpecification. This is machine-readable entity evidence; it does not prove that Google currently displays a rich result.
Why it matters: Structured data helps search engines understand entities and page content. Rich-result eligibility and actual Google presentation are separate and query-dependent.

AI Search Readiness

Captured query and answer text is translated for display. Original provider text remains in the saved evidence.

(Cached evidence · captured 12 Oct 2026 UTC; live access not rechecked)

Six query-scoped observations distinguish page matching, search-assisted answers, source exposure, brand mentions and recommendations. These observations describe the captured query and response, not general AI visibility or ranking. Unverified observations are excluded from Check Score.

Measured observations: 5/6 · Unverified: 1/6. Check Score uses the evaluated observations.

Audited AI query: Is Algün İnşaat İstanbul a recommended choice?

Query / Page Match UNVERIFIED

No complete, scope-matched observation was captured for this measurement.

Search / Fan-out Observed PASS

SEARCH ASSISTED AI ANSWER CAPTURED

Query: Is Algün İnşaat İstanbul recommended? · Observed: 2026-10-12T12:21:53+00:00

Own Domain Exposed PASS

OWN DOMAIN IN AI REFERENCES

Query: Is Algün İnşaat İstanbul recommended? · Observed: 2026-10-12T12:21:53+00:00

Brand Mentioned PASS

EXACT BRAND IN AI ANSWER

Query: Is Algün İnşaat İstanbul recommended? · Observed: 2026-10-12T12:21:53+00:00

Citation-free Mention PASS

BRAND MENTION HAS ATTACHED CITATION

Query: Is Algün İnşaat İstanbul recommended? · Observed: 2026-10-12T12:21:53+00:00

Captured answer and citations

Complete captured mapping. Links show provider attachments to answer blocks; source support for every claim is not independently verified.

Algün İnşaat has projects in regions such as Istanbul and Düzce; it focuses particularly on the Istanbul market with urban transformation and mixed-use projects in central locations such as Ataşehir (for example, Algün Prime Ataşehir).

https://algun.com.tr/projeler/

https://www.yapiinsaatdergisi.com/algun-insaat-istanbuldaki-kentsel-donusum-projesi-algun-prime-atasehirin-satis-ofisini-tamamlayarak-on-satis-icin-dugmeye-basti/

When evaluating a construction company, the general and platform data (complaint websites like Şikayetvar and industry reviews) to consider are as follows:

Complaint and Satisfaction Rates: While overall satisfaction rates for the brand vary periodically across various consumer platforms, complaint response and resolution rates (in terms of customer relationship management) are reported to be at high levels.

https://www.sikayetvar.com/algun-insaat

https://www.kentseledonusum.com/algun-insaat-guvenilir-mi/

Main Reported Issues: As is the case across the sector, the most frequently cited issues in past complaints are generally delays in housing delivery dates, title/occupancy permit processes, and communication breakdowns.

https://www.sikayetvar.com/algun-insaat/daire

In a competitive and risky real estate market like Istanbul, it is recommended to follow these steps when buying or investing in a property from a company:

Inspect the Project You're Interested In On-Site: Visit projects the company has completed previously to personally observe the quality of materials and the promised social amenities.

Read the Contract Terms in Detail: Ensure that the delivery date, delay penalties, occupancy permit responsibilities, and additional costs (goodwill, etc.) are clearly reflected in the contract.

Financial and Legal Security: Confirm the project's licensing status, condominium/easement stages, and the company's commitment capabilities with the assistance of your legal advisor.

You can visit Algün Construction Projects to view their official and current projects.

https://algun.com.tr/projeler/

If you specify whether you are researching a particular Istanbul project (for example, projects in Ataşehir) or a general investment, I can provide more detailed information based on your focus.

Supporting technical observations

About: PASS · Contact: PASS · Schema types: WebPage, ReadAction, BreadcrumbList, ListItem, WebSite, SearchAction, EntryPoint, PropertyValueSpecification, Organization, LocalBusiness, PostalAddress, ContactPoint, GeoCoordinates, OpeningHoursSpecification. Technical presence supports interpretation; it does not prove an AI answer, recommendation, citation or indexing.

DNS & Email Trust

algun.com.tr  ·  First seen on the internet: October 6, 2017
Email Blacklist Status
Clean — not listed on any of 10 primary blacklists checked.
Why it matters: If your domain appears on an email blacklist, your outbound emails (newsletters, booking confirmations, order receipts) land in spam. This directly damages customer communication and revenue.
DMARC Policy
DMARC check unavailable: The collected lookup did not establish record presence or absence.
SPF Record
Found — authorised mail senders are declared for this domain.
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
Why it matters: SPF tells receiving mail servers which servers are allowed to send email for your domain. Without it, spammers can forge your address and your legitimate emails may be blocked.
Go to Top