Select your language

First publication date not recorded.Last updated:
Run another audit with an account
Public canonical reports remain readable without an account. Create a free account for 7 days full access, or log in if you already have an account.
Crowne Plaza Bursa — Hospitality
www.cpbursa.com
See historic audits
Evidence Captured (%)Check Score (/100)

Approved audits, including the current report. Hover or focus a point for values; select it to open the report.

Online Reputation

Executive Summary

39
39/100
Check Score
(19/49 Verified Checks)
2
2/10
Trust Basics
48/86
Evidence Captured
Nov 7, 2009
First Seen On Internet
4.5 / 5.0
Matched Listings Avg. Rating
3,654
Reviews Across Matched Listings
77/100
Mobile PageSpeed
Checks Passed

49 checks were evaluated within the available access and audit scope. 19 are PASS; 20 are WARN and 10 are FAIL. These counts show the results of evaluated checks, not a weighted quality score.

PASS 19WARN 20FAIL 10
Executive Strength / Risk
Strongest evaluated areaGoogle Maps peer evidence4.5/5.0 and 3,654 reviews versus a peer age-adjusted median of 1,574Jump to section
Management attentionMachine-readable entity evidenceorganisation and entity schema was not detected in the audited crawlJump to section

Evidence coverage: 48/86. 38 eligible controls remain unverified or unavailable. Check Score reflects evaluated checks only.

This audit provides a consolidated executive view of how a brand’s digital presence supports—or weakens—its online reputation and the value of its digital investments. It evaluates key public indicators across semantic visibility, technical performance, legal and trust signals, platform consistency, reputation strength, and sector-specific competitive context. Rather than treating these signals in isolation, the audit examines their relationships and relevant correlations with commercial performance. Its final goal is to give senior executives a clear, evidence-based basis for identifying gaps, challenging internal assumptions, prioritizing corrective action, and making better-informed digital investment decisions.

Audit Report Definitions
Check Score

Audited online-presence quality indicator: PASS / (PASS + WARN + FAIL) × 100. Unverified and unavailable checks are excluded. This is not an overall brand or revenue score.

Verified Checks

Shows the checks ALO.NET Audit could evaluate using concrete evidence in this report. For example, 20/37 Verified Checks means that 20 of the 37 evaluated checks received PASS; the remainder may be WARN or FAIL. Unavailable, Unverified and excluded checks are outside this total.

Trust Basics

Summarizes basic website trust signals, including organizational identity, contact information, essential policies and trust infrastructure that help visitors and digital systems assess a website. It indicates basic trust hygiene and is neither a legal compliance certificate nor an overall reputation score.

Evidence Captured

Shows how many applicable checks have enough evidence for evaluation. For example, 48/83 means that usable evidence was obtained for 48 of 83 applicable checks. A higher value indicates broader audit coverage; it does not mean that the website performed well.

First Seen On Internet

Shows an estimated date from which the domain can be observed online. This is not the company incorporation date, the age of the brand or the opening date of a physical business. It provides context about the domain’s observable online history.

Matched Listings Avg. Rating

Shows the average user rating of Google Maps business listings reliably matched to the audited brand or website. Only verified entity matches are included; unrelated businesses with the same or a similar name are excluded. A qualified entity match does not necessarily mean that the listing’s Website field matches the audited domain.

Reviews Across Matched Listings

Shows the total number of user reviews across business listings matched to the brand. It indicates the volume of user feedback and provides context about online visibility. Review volume alone does not establish whether feedback is positive or negative.

Mobile PageSpeed

Shows website performance on mobile devices as a 0–100 score measured using Google Lighthouse/PageSpeed methodology. A higher score generally indicates better loading performance and user experience. This technical performance measure is produced by Google and is independent of the ALO.NET Check Score.

Executive Scoreboard

Provides an at-a-glance executive overview of key audit areas. Each row represents a different area and shows its PASS, WARN and FAIL results or the relevant system’s native score. Rows may use different measurement types, so their values should not always be compared directly as equivalent scores.

Legal Check

Examines whether essential legal and privacy information is accessible to users and search systems, together with related requirements that can be evaluated within the audit scope. ALO.NET Audit does not provide legal advice, and this result is not a legal compliance certificate.

AI Search Readiness

Separates captured query/page matching, search-assisted answers, own-domain sources, brand mentions, explicit recommendations and citation-free mentions. Results apply to the recorded query, market and response; unavailable observations remain neutral. Technical presence does not guarantee AI visibility or ranking.

Frontend Interaction Check

Examines visible interface and link signals that help visitors reach core actions such as contacting the business, searching, getting directions or making a reservation. Detecting a button or link does not establish that the corresponding action was successfully completed from end to end.

Semantic Quality

Evaluates structural and semantic signals that help people and machines understand page content. Headings, content relationships and related semantic cues help clarify what a page communicates.

PageSpeed | SEO Technical Quality

Summarizes measurable indicators of website performance and technical search readiness. Native PageSpeed/Lighthouse scores are provider measurements, rather than scores recreated by ALO.NET. They indicate technical quality but do not independently predict Google rankings.

Maps & Review Metrics

Evaluates verifiable Google Maps business listings, user ratings, review volume and, when available, comparable market evidence. Its purpose is to show the measurable portion of the brand’s local digital reputation within the audited scope.

Structured Data

Checks for structured data defined in website source code using standards such as Schema.org. This data can help search engines understand organizations, businesses, products, services and other content more accurately.

Social Presence

Evaluates the online presence of social media profiles verified as belonging to the brand. The result reflects verifiable brand presence, rather than follower counts or social media success.

Search Presence

Evaluates verifiable signals about whether the brand and website can be found by search systems. It shows available search visibility evidence and does not guarantee a ranking for any particular keyword.

Social Links

Checks links from the website’s own pages to the brand’s social media profiles. These links help establish an explicit first-party relationship between the website and the social accounts.

PASS / WARN / FAIL

PASS means sufficient positive evidence was found for the evaluated condition. WARN means the result is partly positive but needs attention. FAIL means an evaluated check did not meet the expected condition. These statuses apply only to checks that could actually be evaluated.

Crowne Plaza Bursa is a hotel property offering guest accommodation with wellness facilities. Its website highlights Crowne Plaza Bursa. The matched Google Maps listing records 4.5/5 from 3,654 reviews. The website links to X profiles. The captured AI answer mentions the brand in response to the audited query. Further service details and geographic coverage are not added where the collected profile does not substantiate them.

Local Market
Verified Evidence Positioning Map (Nearby Peers)

Comparison scope: Local hotel market · within 2 km of Crowne Plaza Bursa

5 local businesses were independently evaluated using the same 7 ALO.NET entry-page evidence controls.

X: Verified Entry-page Evidence (%) = PASS / 7. Y: Google Maps rating. Bubble area scales with review count. Maps supplies discovery and reputation metadata; ALO supplies the entry-page evidence. This is not a composite market score.

The dark outline marks the focal business. All plotted web evidence uses peer_probe_v1, including the focal business; a probe is not a full audit.

Evaluated local points
Business / websiteDistanceFirst seen on internetOnline agePASS %Maps ratingReviewsEvaluation / provenance
You · Crowne Plaza Bursa
cpbursa.com
0 mNov 7, 200916y 11m0%4.53654
Control evidence

peer_probe_v1 · Full focal audit linked; chart uses fixed-pack probe.
2026-10-15T18:14:06+00:00 · ALO entry-page evaluation + Google Places metadata

  • schema.organization: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source
  • schema.local_business: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source
  • schema.product_service: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source
  • schema.review: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source
  • schema.breadcrumb: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source
  • semantic.primary_offer_clarity: WARN. Concrete offer language is observable, but the primary homepage promise relies partly on supporting copy for clarity. Source
  • semantic.locale_content_coherence: UNVERIFIED. The declared page locale and footer prose could not be compared with sufficient linguistic confidence. Source
Marigold Thermal & SPA Hotel
marigold.com.tr
1991 mOct 26, 200916y 11m28.6%4.52534
Control evidence

peer_probe_v1 · Peer probe only; no full audit linked.
2026-10-15T18:14:07+00:00 · ALO entry-page evaluation + Google Places metadata

  • schema.organization: PASS. Detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source
  • schema.local_business: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source
  • schema.product_service: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source
  • schema.review: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source
  • schema.breadcrumb: PASS. Detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source
  • semantic.primary_offer_clarity: WARN. Concrete offer language is observable, but the primary homepage promise relies partly on supporting copy for clarity. Source
  • semantic.locale_content_coherence: UNVERIFIED. The declared page locale and footer prose could not be compared with sufficient linguistic confidence. Source
Nuri Nihat Aslanoba Uygulama Oteli
okulseyret.com
1961 mJan 20, 201511y 8m0%4.3628
Control evidence

peer_probe_v1 · Peer probe only; no full audit linked.
2026-10-15T18:14:11+00:00 · ALO entry-page evaluation + Google Places metadata

  • schema.organization: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source
  • schema.local_business: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source
  • schema.product_service: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source
  • schema.review: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source
  • schema.breadcrumb: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source
  • semantic.primary_offer_clarity: WARN. Concrete offer language is observable, but the primary homepage promise relies partly on supporting copy for clarity. Source
  • semantic.locale_content_coherence: UNVERIFIED. The declared page locale and footer prose could not be compared with sufficient linguistic confidence. Source
Sia Hotel Thermal & Spa
siahotel.com.tr
664 mJan 30, 20242y 8m28.6%4.7509
Control evidence

peer_probe_v1 · Peer probe only; no full audit linked.
2026-10-15T18:14:11+00:00 · ALO entry-page evaluation + Google Places metadata

  • schema.organization: PASS. Detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source
  • schema.local_business: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source
  • schema.product_service: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source
  • schema.review: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source
  • schema.breadcrumb: PASS. Detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source
  • semantic.primary_offer_clarity: WARN. Concrete offer language is observable, but the primary homepage promise relies partly on supporting copy for clarity. Source
  • semantic.locale_content_coherence: UNVERIFIED. The declared page locale and footer prose could not be compared with sufficient linguistic confidence. Source
Royal Residence Bursa
rr-bursa.com
393 mNov 26, 20250y 10m57.1%4.3313
Control evidence

peer_probe_v1 · Peer probe only; no full audit linked.
2026-10-15T18:14:11+00:00 · ALO entry-page evaluation + Google Places metadata

  • schema.organization: PASS. Detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source
  • schema.local_business: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source
  • schema.product_service: PASS. Detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source
  • schema.review: PASS. Detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source
  • schema.breadcrumb: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source
  • semantic.primary_offer_clarity: PASS. The homepage primary promise names a concrete offer and supporting copy reinforces the same commercial meaning. Source
  • semantic.locale_content_coherence: UNVERIFIED. The declared page locale and footer prose could not be compared with sufficient linguistic confidence. Source
Mansory Hotel
mansoryhotel.com
828 mMay 17, 20242y 4m28.6%4.5280
Control evidence

peer_probe_v1 · Peer probe only; no full audit linked.
2026-10-15T18:14:11+00:00 · ALO entry-page evaluation + Google Places metadata

  • schema.organization: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source
  • schema.local_business: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source
  • schema.product_service: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source
  • schema.review: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source
  • schema.breadcrumb: PASS. Detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source
  • semantic.primary_offer_clarity: PASS. The homepage primary promise names a concrete offer and supporting copy reinforces the same commercial meaning. Source
  • semantic.locale_content_coherence: UNVERIFIED. The declared page locale and footer prose could not be compared with sufficient linguistic confidence. Source
Evidence data and provenance
ScopeLocal Market · Crowne Plaza Bursa
Audited root/entityhttps://www.cpbursa.com/
Selected physical unitCrowne Plaza Bursa
Unit typehotel
Matched locations1
Sector control packhospitality_local_positioning_v1
First-party entry URLhttp://www.cpbursa.com/
Entry selectionSelected from the persisted first-party and Maps identity evidence.
Selected unit Maps rating4.5
Selected unit Maps reviews3654
Entry-page evidenceEvaluated with the sector control pack.
Peer selectionReview-volume reference: 3,654 (selected focal). Closest eligible peers at this volume or higher are preferred; below it, higher counts come first. Sector radius and verified evidence requirements still apply.
Competitor probing5 genuine local peer website probes were evaluated.
Verified Evidence Positioning Map (Comparable Brands)Comparison scope: Hospitality saved audits. Compatible saved ALO.NET Audit reports only; separate from Google Maps Comparable Peers.Youmarriott.comritzcarlton.comthemarmarahotels.comclubmed.com.trmidtown-hotel.com
BrandVerified ChecksShared passes
You19/4914/38
marriott.com38/6920/38
ritzcarlton.com38/6819/38
themarmarahotels.com43/6724/38
clubmed.com.tr31/6120/38
midtown-hotel.com40/7220/38
X: Verified Checks, 0-100 (this audit's eligible-control scale is planned to expand toward 100). Y: verified passes across 38 shared evaluated controls, shown as a count, not a percent. Marker size scales with Verified Checks; legend order and color are identity-only, not a leaderboard.

ALO.NET Audited Cohort: Compatible saved full audits. This population and its historical axes are separate from Local Market web probes.

Compare with Similars

The public decision journey is uneven: machine-readable business clarity creates the clearest controllable gap, while public review position against the verified peer set supplies the strongest verified reassurance. Taken together, the evidence suggests that guests can encounter credible public proof but still receive an avoidably weak handoff toward direct booking action. Management can therefore protect the established reputation signal while tightening the point where discovery should become action. see details ↓

Observed weakness: Machine-readable business clarity is the selected weakness. Organisation and entity schema was not detected in the audited crawl. This is high-confidence search and entity evidence. It does not verify search eligibility, visibility or customer response. see details ↓

Observed strength: Public review position against the verified peer set is the selected strength: 4.5/5.0 and 3,654 reviews versus a peer age-adjusted median of 1,574. This is medium-confidence competitive evidence within the publishable comparable cohort; it does not prove market leadership, preference, conversion or revenue. see details ↓

Management Decision: Management should assign a named owner and review date to machine-readable business clarity, then use a relevant first-party journey indicator to test whether the exposure is reduced. It should preserve public review position against the verified peer set as a managed public strength while keeping the conclusion within the cited confidence, cohort and measurement limits. see details ↓

Supporting Market Evidence: Within the Türkiye audit market, Google Maps identified 1 qualified location listing associated with the audited entity. This is market-bounded evidence, not a complete worldwide physical footprint. see details ↓

machine-readable business clarity: Observed evidence: Organisation and entity schema was not detected in the audited crawl. Why management should care: Search platforms may receive an incomplete relationship between the brand, properties and accommodation offer. What could go wrong: Properties and offers may be represented inconsistently across machine-mediated discovery, complicating guest choice. see details ↓

public review position against the verified peer set: Observed evidence: 4.5/5.0 and 3,654 reviews versus a peer age-adjusted median of 1,574. Management value: The property can lose shortlist confidence to hospitality alternatives with stronger public proof. The public signal should be protected, but it is not proof of a commercial outcome. see details ↓

customer-facing governance: Observed evidence: Legal Check evaluated Booking / cancellation / no-show / payment was incomplete. Why management should care: Management may be less able to reconstruct the governing terms presented at the booking or guest-data decision point. see details ↓

Audit Scope: Audit market: Türkiye. The market was estimated from the auditor's IP connection at submission. Google SERP and Google Maps evidence is limited to this market, including for global brands; the audit does not automatically classify the entity as global or regional. see details ↓

90 days Priorities

  1. Do Brand, Digital and Operations agree on the canonical entity, location and offer relationships that public platforms should understand? see details ↓
  2. Can the business retrieve the governing terms, including the exact version, timestamp and responsible owner, for the relevant guest decision? see details ↓
  3. Which operating decision will address the verified peer gap, and which leading indicator will the executive team review monthly? see details ↓

90-Day Priority Actions

  1. Correct the measured structured-data weakness, then validate.Measured evidence supports a bounded remediation; ranking uses the recorded score gap, relevance weight, confidence and actionability.HighActionable within 90 days
  2. Improve the measured publisher-controlled search metadata, then recheck.Measured evidence supports a bounded remediation; ranking uses the recorded score gap, relevance weight, confidence and actionability.HighActionable within 90 days
  3. Correct the verified identity inconsistency on the evidenced assets.Measured evidence supports a bounded remediation; ranking uses the recorded score gap, relevance weight, confidence and actionability.MediumActionable within 90 days

Google PageSpeed/SEO — www.cpbursa.com

Page speed shapes first impressions before a single word is read. A low Performance score — especially on mobile — means visitors leave before engaging. Google uses Core Web Vitals as a ranking signal, so poor speed hurts discoverability. The SEO score here reflects technical crawlability only, not full SEO strength. Accessibility measures inclusivity. Best Practices flags security and standards compliance. Together, these reveal how seriously the digital asset is maintained.

Mobile
PSI lab run: 2026-10-12T11:09:19.340Z UTC · stale cached value used after PSI/API retry failed
Mobile screenshot
77
Performance
80
Accessibility
88
Best Practices
55
SEO
Desktop
PSI lab run: 2026-10-12T11:09:19.014Z UTC · stale cached value used after PSI/API retry failed
Desktop screenshot
97
Performance
80
Accessibility
92
Best Practices
55
SEO
Google PageSpeed SEO score has been multiplied by 0.75. Why?Google PageSpeed Insights SEO score is not a real SEO score; it is a limited technical crawlability and on-page hygiene check only.  For deep SEO/AIO analysis, please contact info@alo.net.
Evidence details ▾
FAIL Largest contentful paint (lab)

Mobile: FAIL (4151.1596441992 ms) [stale]; Desktop: PASS (972.70668846315 ms) [stale]. Lighthouse lab measurement of the tested entry; not field Core Web Vitals.

PASS Layout stability (lab)

Mobile: PASS (0.0006580398022104 unitless) [stale]; Desktop: PASS (0.0014446117896857 unitless) [stale]. Lighthouse lab measurement of the tested entry; not field Core Web Vitals.

PASS Blocking responsiveness proxy (lab)

Mobile: PASS (91.5 ms) [stale]; Desktop: PASS (58.5 ms) [stale]. Lab main-thread blocking proxy; not field INP or verified real-user responsiveness.

PASS Entry-page indexing directives

Mobile: PASS [stale]; Desktop: PASS [stale]. Tested entry indexing directives only; no proof of search inclusion, robots access or whole-site crawlability. Intentional noindex needs publisher review.

Google Maps Reviews

The results below are limited to the Türkiye audit market. This is market-biased Google Maps evidence, not a complete worldwide footprint and not an automatic global/regional brand classification.
Matched listings average rating: 4.5 (pass). 1 Maps match found for www.cpbursa.com
3,654
Reviews Across Matched Listings
4.5 ★★★★★
Matched Listings Avg. Rating
1
Maps Matches
ALO.NET Peer Benchmark — based on current Google Maps data

Matched Google Maps listing: Crowne Plaza Bursa

This comparison is limited to the qualified Google Maps listing for the audited entity.

Based on 20 quality-qualified current City hotel peers in the local market around the audited location expanded up to 15 km, the current review-footprint distribution is kept separate from age-adjusted eligibility. Cohort validity: valid; sample confidence: Medium.

Age-adjusted review volume uses 19 eligible peers. At the focal listing's observed online age, P25 / median / P75 are 1,125 / 1,574 / 2,733 reviews; the audited listing has 3,654.

Its 4.5 Google rating is above the peer median of 4.3. Rating-eligible peer sample: 20. Audited rating percentile: 90th percentile.

Sector / business model / scale: Hospitality / City hotel / Local · Observed online age band: 5+ years · Signal confidence: confirmed_public_signal · Benchmark confidence: Medium · Cohort validity: valid · Calculation date: 2026-10-15

Source: Google Maps · Benchmark methodology: ALO.NET

Crowne Plaza Bursa
Photo: TAWFIQ ALBAHAR
4.5 ★★★★★ (3,654 reviews)

Competitive Google Maps Rating vs Comparable Peers

Above peer median

Competitive Google Maps peer analysis - not a generic score.

90thAudited percentile
+0.2Rating gap vs peer median
20 | MediumPeer sample | confidence

The audited brand's Google rating is above comparable peers in the local competitive set.

20 comparable Google Maps peers | Medium sample confidence | cohort validity: valid | current rating distribution | ALO.NET methodology | calculated 2026-10-15 | the local market around the audited location | Attempted radii: 2 km, 5 km, 8 km, 15 km.

Why it matters: Comparable Peers are nearby, currently operating Google Maps businesses that passed the same business-type and brand-exclusion checks. They are the local competitive set, not a generic industry average.

Audited Brand: The marker represents Crowne Plaza Bursa. It was selected because it is the only eligible established Google Maps listing matched to the audited brand.

Competitive Google Maps Review Volume vs Comparable Peers

Above peer market

Current review footprint - not Review Momentum and not age-normalized.

95thAudited percentile
2.0xReview count vs peer median
20 | MediumPeer sample | confidence

The audited listing's current Google Maps review footprint is above comparable peers in the local competitive set.

20 comparable Google Maps peers | Medium sample confidence | cohort validity: valid | current raw review-count distribution | ALO.NET methodology | calculated 2026-10-15 | the local market around the audited location | Attempted radii: 2 km, 5 km, 8 km, 15 km.

Competitive Reputation Position

Above-median peer position

Two validated Google Maps peer percentiles shown together - not a synthetic score.

Crowne Plaza Bursa · audited peer position95thREVIEW VOLUME PERCENTILE90thGOOGLE RATING PERCENTILEPEER MEDIANQUALITY-LED · LOWER REACHABOVE-MEDIAN PEER POSITIONREPUTATION GAPHIGH REACH · RATING RISK01.252.53.75504,069Review Volume scale (logarithmic)Google RatingSheraton Bursa Hotel: Rating 4.5, Review Volume 4,0691Gold Majesty Hotel: Rating 4.3, Review Volume 3,0092Tiara Termal Hotel: Rating 3.6, Review Volume 2,8353Anemon Bursa Gönlüferah Hotel: Rating 4.0, Review Volume 2,5934Çelik Palas Hotel Convention Center & Thermal Spa: Rating 4.2, Review Volume 2,5445Marigold Thermal & SPA Hotel: Rating 4.5, Review Volume 2,5346Formback Thermal Hotel & Thermal Plants: Rating 4.0, Review Volume 2,5257Mövenpick Hotel and Thermal Spa Bursa: Rating 4.5, Review Volume 2,4908Ramada by Wyndham Bursa Cekirge Thermal & Spa: Rating 4.3, Review Volume 2,1169Hotel Anatolia: Rating 4.2, Review Volume 1,86510KERVANSARAY TERMAL OTEL CONVENTION CENTER & SPA: Rating 3.8, Review Volume 1,82511Aloft Bursa Hotel: Rating 4.4, Review Volume 1,48512Audited: Rating 4.5, Review Volume 3,654A

Bubbles prioritize the highest-review paired peers; all paired peers remain in both axis statistics.

20 paired comparable peers analyzed · 12 highest-review peers shown

  1. 1. Sheraton Bursa Hotel · 4.5 / 4,069
  2. 2. Gold Majesty Hotel · 4.3 / 3,009
  3. 3. Tiara Termal Hotel · 3.6 / 2,835
  4. 4. Anemon Bursa Gönlüferah… · 4.0 / 2,593
  5. 5. Çelik Palas Hotel Conve… · 4.2 / 2,544
  6. 6. Marigold Thermal & SPA … · 4.5 / 2,534
  7. 7. Formback Thermal Hotel … · 4.0 / 2,525
  8. 8. Mövenpick Hotel and The… · 4.5 / 2,490
  9. 9. Ramada by Wyndham Bursa… · 4.3 / 2,116
  10. 10. Hotel Anatolia · 4.2 / 1,865
  11. 11. KERVANSARAY TERMAL OTEL… · 3.8 / 1,825
  12. 12. Aloft Bursa Hotel · 4.4 / 1,485

Competitive read: Very strong visibility and rating quality above the peer median.

20 paired comparable Google Maps peers | Medium sample confidence | cohort validity: valid | shared persisted Rating ∩ Review Volume peer-ID denominator | median crosshair = paired-cohort 50th percentile | ALO.NET methodology | calculated 2026-10-15 | Attempted radii: 2 km, 5 km, 8 km, 15 km.

Evidence coverage dashboard

ALO.NET KPI Profile

Six-pillar evidence coverage and status distribution. Verified Checks remains separate and no KPI maturity score is inferred.

Score withheld
PASSWARNFAILUnverifiedUnavailableInformational

Where is verified KPI evidence concentrated?

Raw deterministic evidence states are compared across all six approved pillars. Bar length is a count, not maturity or a KPI score.

Focus, hover or tap a chart value for exact evidence details.
Canonical findings and evidence ownership

Verified capabilities and gaps retain their evidence scope. Source observations do not prove rendered interaction. Findings are ordered by status and control ID; commercial impact is not ranked.

Online Discoverability

  • Verified capability: X profile linkage · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified capability: Entry-page indexing directives · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface — Entry-page indexing directives: pass. Reason: TYPED_PASS.
  • Verified gap: Publisher description quality · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: Publisher title quality · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: Facebook profile linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: Instagram profile linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: LinkedIn profile linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: Pinterest profile linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: TikTok profile linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: YouTube profile linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: Declared location linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
  • Evidence gap: Search result language consistency · UNAVAILABLE · Platform evidence

Reputation & Trust

  • Verified capability: Blocklist exposure · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified capability: SPF policy · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified capability: X public profile presence · PASS · Platform evidence
  • Verified capability: Comparable rating position · PASS · Platform evidence
  • Verified capability: Matched listing rating · PASS · Platform evidence
  • Verified capability: Secure connection · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: Facebook public profile presence · FAIL · Platform evidence
  • Verified gap: Instagram public profile presence · FAIL · Platform evidence
  • Verified gap: Cross-channel visual identity · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: Site icon presence · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: X visual identity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: DMARC policy · UNAVAILABLE · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: LinkedIn public profile presence · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
  • Evidence gap: YouTube public profile presence · UNAVAILABLE · Platform evidence
  • Evidence gap: Facebook visual identity · UNAVAILABLE · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: Instagram visual identity · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: LinkedIn visual identity · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: YouTube visual identity · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: About identity evidence · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: Content freshness evidence · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface

Website Experience & Performance

  • Verified capability: Blocking responsiveness proxy (lab) · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface — Blocking responsiveness proxy (lab): pass. Reason: TYPED_PASS.
  • Verified capability: Layout stability (lab) · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface — Layout stability (lab): pass. Reason: TYPED_PASS.
  • Verified capability: Desktop lab performance · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified capability: Mobile lab performance · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: Accessible link names · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface — Accessible link names: fail. Reason: TYPED_FAIL.
  • Verified gap: Largest contentful paint (lab) · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface — Largest contentful paint (lab): fail. Reason: TYPED_FAIL.
  • Verified gap: Accessibility markup basics · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: Image format hygiene · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: Responsive viewport declaration · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface

Measurement & Conversion Readiness

  • Verified gap: Directions markup actionability · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: Email markup actionability · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: Primary CTA markup · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: Analytics script declaration · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface — Analytics script declaration: warn. Reason: TYPED_WARN.
  • Verified gap: Tag manager declaration · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface — Tag manager declaration: warn. Reason: TYPED_WARN.
  • Evidence gap: Phone markup actionability · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: Rendered interaction evidence · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: Contact path evidence · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface

Semantic & AI Readiness

  • Verified capability: Search result message relevance · PASS · Platform evidence
  • Verified capability: Brand Mentioned · PASS · Platform evidence
  • Verified capability: Own Domain Exposed · PASS · Platform evidence
  • Verified capability: Query / Page Match · PASS · Platform evidence
  • Verified capability: Search / Fan-out Observed · PASS · Platform evidence
  • Verified gap: Brand Recommended · FAIL · Platform evidence
  • Verified gap: Navigation intent alignment · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: Primary offer clarity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: Local business structured identity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: Breadcrumb structured data · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: Product or service structured identity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: Organization structured identity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: Review structured data · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: Citation-free Mention · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
  • Evidence gap: Conversion intent alignment · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: Locale content coherence · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface

Legal & Privacy Governance

  • Verified capability: Benchmark legal quality · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified capability: Cookie notice presence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: Implementation legal quality · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: Sector legal quality · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: Booking / Cancellation / Payment Terms · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Verified gap: On-site Legal Discoverability & Freshness · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: Freshness legal quality · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: Jurisdiction legal quality · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: Cookie & Consent · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: Guest Data Transparency · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: Guest Forms & Marketing Consent · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: Hotel / Operator Legal Identity · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: Privacy / Data Protection · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: Rights / Privacy Contact · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: Third-Party Booking / Data Sharing · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: Booking & accommodation terms indexed discoverability · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
  • Evidence gap: Cancellation & refund indexed discoverability · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
  • Evidence gap: Cookie policy indexed discoverability · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
  • Evidence gap: Privacy & data protection indexed discoverability · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
  • Evidence gap: Privacy policy presence · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
  • Evidence gap: Terms presence · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface

How do Mobile and Desktop Lighthouse results compare?

This compares the stored Lighthouse category results by device; the four categories are not averaged into a new score.

What does the matched Google Maps location show?

Only one eligible matched location was collected, so no portfolio comparison is inferred.

Crowne Plaza Bursa3,654 reviews4.5 ratingSelected focal branch

Percentiles withheld: a defensible branch-level peer matching unit was not established.

Accessible KPI evidence table
ALO.NET KPI Profile evidence coverage and status distribution
PillarEvaluated / applicablePASSWARNFAILUnverifiedUnavailableEvidence coverageConfidence
Online Discoverability4 / 12220714 of 12 applicable controls evaluatedRetained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control
Reputation & Trust11 / 206146311 of 20 applicable controls evaluatedRetained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control
Website Experience & Performance9 / 9432009 of 9 applicable controls evaluatedRetained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control
Measurement & Conversion Readiness5 / 8023305 of 8 applicable controls evaluatedRetained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control
Semantic & AI Readiness13 / 165713013 of 16 applicable controls evaluatedRetained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control
Legal & Privacy Governance6 / 212401506 of 21 applicable controls evaluatedRetained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control
Accessible PageSpeed data table
Stored PageSpeed device comparison
DevicePerformanceAccessibilityBest PracticesSEOSource collection time
Mobile778088732026-10-12T11:09:19.340Z
Desktop978092732026-10-12T11:09:19.014Z
Accessible Maps location data table
Matched Google Maps location evidence
LocationReviewsRatingFocal status
Crowne Plaza Bursa36544.5Selected focal branch

Measurement & Conversion Readiness

Evidence details ▾
WARN Analytics script declaration

Not detected from the inspected entry source; deferred or consent-dependent loading remains possible. Presence does not establish execution, events, conversions or form delivery.

WARN Tag manager declaration

Not detected from the inspected entry source; deferred or consent-dependent loading remains possible. Presence does not establish execution, events, conversions or form delivery.

Indexed policy evidence

Google-Indexed Legal Discoverability

Indexed-search discoverability only. This is separate from audited-site presence in Trust Basics and content completeness in Legal Check.

Not evaluated

Not evaluated — reliable website-language evidence was not available.

Sector: HospitalityEvaluated locales: NoneIndexed-source readiness: source not readyKPI treatment: Score withheld
PresentationUnknown
Document scopeUnknown
Locale gapsNo cross-locale gap established

This control reviews indexed-search discoverability only. It does not establish that a document is current or present on the live website, and legal compliance was not verified.

Competitive Reputation Context

Sector
Hospitality
Business Model
Not classified from audited evidence

For the matched Google Maps listing, the current Google Maps review footprint is above, with 3,654 reviews compared with a qualified-peer median of 1,845. Its 4.5 rating remains above the peer median of 4.3. This comparison is limited to the qualified Google Maps listing for the audited entity. This comparison applies only to the documented Google Maps cohort and does not classify overall online reputation. Separately observed organisation and entity schema not detected in the audited crawl may weaken booking confidence.

Comparable peers must match sector, business model, brand scale and market context. Each reputation platform is interpreted as its own layer; Google Maps ratings are not blended with Tripadvisor, Trustpilot, OTA, social, SERP or PageSpeed signals.

Sector and business model assignment
Confidence: needs_manual_verification · Peer interpretation: not_comparable
Manual assignment is preferred when the audited brand operates in a complex category. Automatic detection is treated as detected_but_weak unless supported by machine-readable public signals.
Google Maps peer layer
Confidence: confirmed_public_signal · Peer interpretation: above_peer_median
Google Maps peer comparison is based only on comparable Google Maps places and is not mixed with Tripadvisor, Trustpilot, OTA, or other platform scores.
Mobile lead / decision experience
Confidence: confirmed_public_signal · Peer interpretation: not_comparable
Mobile PageSpeed is 77/100 under automated audit conditions. In this sector, mobile performance affects booking confidence and conversion intent.
Entity and structured-data clarity
Confidence: not_detected_by_this_audit · Peer interpretation: not_comparable
Structured data was not detected by this audit. This means it was not machine-readable in the audited crawl, not that the brand definitely lacks it.
Foundational trust maturity
Confidence: needs_manual_verification · Peer interpretation: not_comparable
Trust Basics: 2/10; unresolved criteria require further verification and were not treated as failures.

Public reviews directly influence booking confidence. Weak review scores, weak OTA or Maps visibility, poor mobile speed, and unclear brand/entity signals should be read as revenue and booking-confidence risks, not only SEO issues.

Sector classification is based on bounded audited-root evidence. Each row-level observation remains separately limited by its stated crawl, provider and verification conditions.

(Cached evidence · captured 12 Oct 2026 UTC; live access not rechecked)

Semantic Check

This marketing-oriented comparison examines whether homepage promise, navigation intent and conversion actions remain semantically coherent across the public website evidence collected for this audit.

Evaluated findings may contribute to Verified Checks, which is separate from the future 100-point KPI score. A Not verifiable Navigation-to-Landing Alignment is a WARN coverage state, never a failure; other unavailable, unverified and informational evidence is excluded.

Primary Offer Clarity
Partially clear

Concrete offer language is observable, but the primary homepage promise relies partly on supporting copy for clarity.

Navigation Destination Alignment
Not verifiable

Destination verification unavailable: Navigation destinations could not be compared from the bounded evidence set.

CTA-to-Destination Alignment
Not verifiable

Not verifiable: CTA destination meaning could not be compared from the bounded evidence set.

Locale-to-Content Coherence
Not verifiable

Not verifiable: The declared page locale and footer prose could not be compared with sufficient linguistic confidence.

Live SERP Description Marketing Relevance
Marketing-relevant

The live brand-search description provides substantive non-legal copy that can introduce the brand or page offer.

  • Crowne Plaza Bursa Convention Center & Thermal Spa Odunluk Mh. Akpınar Cd. No:17 16110 Nilüfer / Bursa. Şehir Rehberi. Privilege Card. Çevre Politikası. Kalite ... — https://www.cpbursa.com/
Evidence scope: 16 internal candidates discovered; 2 bounded destination pages fetched.

Frontend Interaction Check

This interaction-oriented review examines whether public contact details and conversion controls expose usable native actions in the collected website evidence.

Source markup does not by itself prove visual clickability. A Not observed contact or CTA input is a FAIL only after accessible bounded source evidence was evaluated; browser-required, restricted and unverified observations are excluded from Verified Checks and canonical KPI scoring.

Phone Actionability
Text only

The observed phone value is exposed as text without a matching native action in source markup.

Email Actionability
Not observed

Email contact text was not reliably observed in the bounded homepage evidence.

Address-to-Directions Actionability
Not observed

Address contact text was not reliably observed in the bounded homepage evidence.

CTA (Call-To-Action) Markup Actionability
Not observed

No bounded primary CTA candidate was observed in the homepage source evidence.

Rendered Interaction Evidence
Browser verification required

Not verifiable: Source markup cannot prove visual affordance, pointer hit testing, overlay interference, focus visibility or runtime activation.

Collected: 2026-10-15T18:13:54+00:00

Social Presence Signals

This section checks whether the brand's public social profiles are visibly connected to the audited domain. Instagram profile images are checked through Meta Business Discovery when a valid Page Access Token is available. Profiles discovered by brand name are included only when they are verified against the audited domain.

YouTube Channel
Unavailable — YouTube search returned no channel results. This does not establish that the brand has no YouTube channel.
Instagram
Profile found: No
Profile URL: Not detected
Website/domain match: Not publicly visible
Interpretation: Instagram was not detected on the audited website as a public profile asset.
X
Profile found: Yes
Website/domain match: Match
Interpretation: X appears publicly visible and aligned with the audited domain.
Facebook
Profile found: No
Profile URL: Not detected
Website/domain match: Not publicly visible
Interpretation: Facebook was not detected on the audited website as a public profile asset.

Logo Consistency Check

Brand logos retrieved for 2 of 3 checked channels, but the retrieved social-channel logos do not match the website logo or verified website icon / brand mark. Some platforms block automated logo access. This cross-channel inconsistency can weaken brand recognition and negatively affect online reputation.
Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Crowne-Plaza-Bursa/422895997870884(logo not retrievable — platform blocks automated access)
Digital image quality: Profile image unavailable; quality was not evaluated.
X logo
X
https://x.com/CrowneBursa(logo differs from the website logo and icon family)
Digital image quality: Limited source resolution (200×200 px) may reduce digital sharpness.
Favicon / Site Icon
Not detected — no favicon or site icon found; browsers show a generic placeholder in tabs and bookmarks.
Why it matters: A favicon strengthens brand recognition in the browser tab and bookmarks; its absence signals incomplete website setup to visitors.

Trust Basic Web Scraping

2/10
Trust Basics

Evidence scope: audited-site observation. A green dot means the signal was detected from the audited entry point or bounded first-party evidence. It does not mean the same information was available to the indexed-search provider or that its legal completeness was verified.

Insufficient evidence for a Trust Score. The badge reports detected ten-item Trust Basics; unresolved criteria remain neutral and are not counted as failures.

About Page
Insufficient source evidence — this criterion could not be verified from the bounded first-party evidence collected during the audit.
Why it matters: Visitors and search engines use the About page to verify the legitimacy of a business; its absence reduces trust and conversion.
Contact Page
Insufficient source evidence — this criterion could not be verified from the bounded first-party evidence collected during the audit.
Why it matters: A reachable business is a trustworthy business; Google also uses contact signals as a local relevance and E-E-A-T factor (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness).
Privacy Policy
Insufficient source evidence — this criterion could not be verified from the bounded first-party evidence collected during the audit.
Why it matters: This Trust Basics control observes audited-site presence only. Google-indexed visibility and legal completeness are reported separately.
Terms of Use
Insufficient source evidence — this criterion could not be verified from the bounded first-party evidence collected during the audit.
Why it matters: This Trust Basics control checks generic site-terms presence only; transaction-specific terms and indexed-search discoverability are separate checks.
Mobile Responsive Design
Viewport meta tag missing — mobile usability issue detected; negatively impacts Google rankings.
Why it matters: Over 60% of web traffic is mobile; Google uses mobile-first indexing, so non-responsive sites rank lower and lose visitors.
Image Format Quality
Only 0% of images use modern formats; replacing large JPG/PNG files with WebP/AVIF and using SVG for the logo is recommended. WebP: 0 · AVIF: 0 · JPG/JPEG: 16 · PNG: 8 · Logo SVG not found
Why it matters: Modern image formats reduce page weight by 25–50% and maybe even more.
Constant Acceptance — Accessibility (a11y)
Accessibility signals weak or missing. ARIA attributes: 0 · Lang attribute: missing · Image alt coverage: 7%
Why it matters: Accessible sites reach 15% more users (including those with disabilities), avoid legal risk (ADA/EAA), and earn better Core Web Vitals signals from Google.
HTTPS / Secure Connection
Website is served over HTTPS — encrypted connection protects visitors and earns the browser padlock.
Why it matters: HTTPS is a confirmed Google ranking factor; browsers display security warnings on HTTP sites, causing visitors to abandon immediately.
Multilingual Site
This site is French and German bilingual. Serving content in multiple languages broadens audience reach and improves international SEO.
Why it matters: Multilingual sites can capture search traffic across language markets; ensure each language version has its own hreflang tag, sitemap entry, and properly localised metadata for maximum visibility.
Automated Client Reachability
A standard GET request and a lightweight automated HEAD probe both succeeded — no automated-client compatibility issue was detected.
Why it matters: Some legacy servers or WAFs block non-browser HTTP methods or automated user agents while still serving real visitors and search engines normally; this is verified sub-evidence for the HTTPS/Secure Connection control, not a separate scored control.
Content Freshness
Unavailable — no evaluated finding was retained in this report.
(Cached evidence · captured 12 Oct 2026 UTC; live access not rechecked)

Schema.org Basic Check

Organization Schema
Organization schema not found — adding Organization JSON-LD helps Google correctly identify and display your brand.
Why it matters: Organization structured data helps search engines understand the entity. Detection does not guarantee a Knowledge Panel or a particular branded-search presentation.
LocalBusiness Schema
LocalBusiness schema not found — important for local SEO for any business with a physical location.
Why it matters: LocalBusiness schema enables Google Maps rich results and improves visibility in "near me" searches.
Product / Service Schema
Product/Service schema not found — sites offering services or products are missing rich snippet opportunities.
Why it matters: Product schema enables price, availability, and review stars in SERP, increasing click-through rates significantly.
Review / AggregateRating Schema
Review schema not found — sites with customer reviews have an opportunity to show star snippets in search results.
Why it matters: Star ratings in SERP increase click-through rates by up to 35% compared to plain listings.
BreadcrumbList Schema
BreadcrumbList schema not found — can be added to display site navigation structure in search results.
Why it matters: Breadcrumbs in SERP improve user understanding of site structure and modestly improve click-through rates.

Google SERP Preview

Google SERP stands for Google Search Engine Results Page — the page of results shown when someone searches online for a brand, product, person, service, or related topic. It is often the very first impression a potential customer, partner, or journalist has of the searched entity. Optimizing these elements is frequently one of the highest-return SEO actions available, because it can influence click-through rate before the visitor ever lands on the website.

Source: live Google organic results captured through SerpApi engine=google. The preview uses one domain-matched item from organic_results; results can vary by query, location, country, language, device and collection time.

www.cpbursa.com
Crowne Plaza Bursa
Crowne Plaza Bursa Convention Center & Thermal Spa Odunluk Mh. Akpınar Cd. No:17 16110 Nilüfer / Bursa. Şehir Rehberi. Privilege Card. Çevre Politikası. Kalite …
Site Title
Title tag needs attention. Length: 18 characters — too short (ideal: 30–60 characters).
Why it matters: The title tag is the single most visible element in SERP; getting length and keyword placement right is the easiest SEO win.
Meta Description
Homepage meta description tag not found in the audit data. Google may still show a generated snippet from page content; the issue is lack of publisher-controlled SERP copy. Write a 120–160 character description to control SERP appearance and improve click-through rates.
Why it matters: A well-written meta description acts as ad copy in SERP; it directly influences click-through rate even though it is not a direct ranking factor.
Structured Data Detected
JSON-LD structured data was not detected from the audited homepage.
Why it matters: Structured data helps search engines understand entities and page content. Rich-result eligibility and actual Google presentation are separate and query-dependent.
(Cached evidence · captured 12 Oct 2026 UTC; live access not rechecked)

AI Search Readiness

Six query-scoped observations distinguish page matching, search-assisted answers, source exposure, brand mentions and recommendations. These observations describe the captured query and response, not general AI visibility or ranking. Unverified observations are excluded from Check Score.

Measured observations: 5/6 · Unverified: 1/6. Check Score uses the evaluated observations.

Audited AI query: Crowne Plaza Bursa aileler için tatil için önerilir mi?

The AI answer request timed out; this does not establish poor brand readiness.

Query / Page Match PASS

BRANDED QUERY PUBLISHER PAGE MATCH

Query: Crowne Plaza Bursa · Observed: 2026-10-15T18:13:51+00:00

https://www.cpbursa.com/
Search / Fan-out Observed PASS

SEARCH ASSISTED AI ANSWER CAPTURED

Query: Crowne Plaza Bursa · Observed: 2026-10-15T18:13:51+00:00

Own Domain Exposed PASS

OWN DOMAIN IN AI REFERENCES

Query: Crowne Plaza Bursa · Observed: 2026-10-15T18:13:51+00:00

Brand Mentioned PASS

EXACT BRAND IN AI ANSWER

Query: Crowne Plaza Bursa · Observed: 2026-10-15T18:13:51+00:00

Citation-free Mention UNVERIFIED

No complete, scope-matched observation was captured for this measurement.

Captured answer and citations

Partial captured mapping; unresolved sources remain unverified. Links show provider attachments to answer blocks; source support for every claim is not independently verified.

Rezervasyon ve detaylı bilgi için Crowne Plaza Bursa Resmî Sitesi adresini ziyaret edebilirsiniz.

https://www.cpbursa.com/

https://www.cpbursa.com/

Konaklama planladığınız tarih aralığını veya kişi sayısını paylaşırsanız güncel fiyatlar ve uygunluk durumuna bakabilirim.

Supporting technical observations

About: UNVERIFIED · Contact: UNVERIFIED · Schema types: . Technical presence supports interpretation; it does not prove an AI answer, recommendation, citation or indexing.

DNS & Email Trust

cpbursa.com  ·  First seen on the internet: November 7, 2009
Email Blacklist Status
Clean — not listed on any of 10 primary blacklists checked.
Why it matters: If your domain appears on an email blacklist, your outbound emails (newsletters, booking confirmations, order receipts) land in spam. This directly damages customer communication and revenue.
DMARC check unavailable: The collected lookup did not establish record presence or absence.
SPF Record
Found — authorised mail senders are declared for this domain.
v=spf1 ip4:82.150.87.70 -all
Why it matters: SPF tells receiving mail servers which servers are allowed to send email for your domain. Without it, spammers can forge your address and your legitimate emails may be blocked.
Go to Top