See historic audits
Approved audits, including the current report. Hover or focus a point for values; select it to open the report.
Online Reputation
Executive Summary
Checks Passed
61 checks were evaluated within the available access and audit scope. 29 are PASS; 27 are WARN and 5 are FAIL. These counts show the results of evaluated checks, not a weighted quality score.
Executive Scoreboard
Executive Strength / Risk
Evidence coverage: 58/88. 30 eligible controls remain unverified or unavailable. Check Score reflects evaluated checks only.
This audit provides a consolidated executive view of how a brand’s digital presence supports—or weakens—its online reputation and the value of its digital investments. It evaluates key public indicators across semantic visibility, technical performance, legal and trust signals, platform consistency, reputation strength, and sector-specific competitive context. Rather than treating these signals in isolation, the audit examines their relationships and relevant correlations with commercial performance. Its final goal is to give senior executives a clear, evidence-based basis for identifying gaps, challenging internal assumptions, prioritizing corrective action, and making better-informed digital investment decisions.
Audit Report Definitions
Check Score
Audited online-presence quality indicator: PASS / (PASS + WARN + FAIL) × 100. Unverified and unavailable checks are excluded. This is not an overall brand or revenue score.
Verified Checks
Shows the checks ALO.NET Audit could evaluate using concrete evidence in this report. For example, 20/37 Verified Checks means that 20 of the 37 evaluated checks received PASS; the remainder may be WARN or FAIL. Unavailable, Unverified and excluded checks are outside this total.
Trust Basics
Summarizes basic website trust signals, including organizational identity, contact information, essential policies and trust infrastructure that help visitors and digital systems assess a website. It indicates basic trust hygiene and is neither a legal compliance certificate nor an overall reputation score.
Evidence Captured
Shows how many applicable checks have enough evidence for evaluation. For example, 48/83 means that usable evidence was obtained for 48 of 83 applicable checks. A higher value indicates broader audit coverage; it does not mean that the website performed well.
First Seen On Internet
Shows an estimated date from which the domain can be observed online. This is not the company incorporation date, the age of the brand or the opening date of a physical business. It provides context about the domain’s observable online history.
Matched Listings Avg. Rating
Shows the average user rating of Google Maps business listings reliably matched to the audited brand or website. Only verified entity matches are included; unrelated businesses with the same or a similar name are excluded. A qualified entity match does not necessarily mean that the listing’s Website field matches the audited domain.
Reviews Across Matched Listings
Shows the total number of user reviews across business listings matched to the brand. It indicates the volume of user feedback and provides context about online visibility. Review volume alone does not establish whether feedback is positive or negative.
Mobile PageSpeed
Shows website performance on mobile devices as a 0–100 score measured using Google Lighthouse/PageSpeed methodology. A higher score generally indicates better loading performance and user experience. This technical performance measure is produced by Google and is independent of the ALO.NET Check Score.
Executive Scoreboard
Provides an at-a-glance executive overview of key audit areas. Each row represents a different area and shows its PASS, WARN and FAIL results or the relevant system’s native score. Rows may use different measurement types, so their values should not always be compared directly as equivalent scores.
Legal Check
Examines whether essential legal and privacy information is accessible to users and search systems, together with related requirements that can be evaluated within the audit scope. ALO.NET Audit does not provide legal advice, and this result is not a legal compliance certificate.
AI Search Readiness
Separates captured query/page matching, search-assisted answers, own-domain sources, brand mentions, explicit recommendations and citation-free mentions. Results apply to the recorded query, market and response; unavailable observations remain neutral. Technical presence does not guarantee AI visibility or ranking.
Frontend Interaction Check
Examines visible interface and link signals that help visitors reach core actions such as contacting the business, searching, getting directions or making a reservation. Detecting a button or link does not establish that the corresponding action was successfully completed from end to end.
Semantic Quality
Evaluates structural and semantic signals that help people and machines understand page content. Headings, content relationships and related semantic cues help clarify what a page communicates.
PageSpeed | SEO Technical Quality
Summarizes measurable indicators of website performance and technical search readiness. Native PageSpeed/Lighthouse scores are provider measurements, rather than scores recreated by ALO.NET. They indicate technical quality but do not independently predict Google rankings.
Maps & Review Metrics
Evaluates verifiable Google Maps business listings, user ratings, review volume and, when available, comparable market evidence. Its purpose is to show the measurable portion of the brand’s local digital reputation within the audited scope.
Structured Data
Checks for structured data defined in website source code using standards such as Schema.org. This data can help search engines understand organizations, businesses, products, services and other content more accurately.
Social Presence
Evaluates the online presence of social media profiles verified as belonging to the brand. The result reflects verifiable brand presence, rather than follower counts or social media success.
Search Presence
Evaluates verifiable signals about whether the brand and website can be found by search systems. It shows available search visibility evidence and does not guarantee a ranking for any particular keyword.
Social Links
Checks links from the website’s own pages to the brand’s social media profiles. These links help establish an explicit first-party relationship between the website and the social accounts.
PASS / WARN / FAIL
PASS means sufficient positive evidence was found for the evaluated condition. WARN means the result is partly positive but needs attention. FAIL means an evaluated check did not meet the expected condition. These statuses apply only to checks that could actually be evaluated.
Dedeman Hotels & Resorts International appears to be a hospitality or travel business, but the specific accommodation or travel offer could not be verified from the available site evidence. The matched Google Maps listing records 4.5/5 from 8,635 reviews. The website links to Instagram, Facebook and YouTube profiles. The captured AI answer mentions the brand in response to the audited query. Further service details and geographic coverage are not added where the collected profile does not substantiate them.
Nearby evidence completed in the background at 2026-10-12 14:06:32 UTC. Audit scores and original findings are unchanged. Dedeman Konya Hotel & Convention Center is the representative hotel selected from 12 matched locations. Comparison scope: Representative local hotel market · within 2 km of Dedeman Konya Hotel & Convention Center (selected as a representative branch from 12 matched locations). 5 local businesses were independently evaluated using the same 7 ALO.NET entry-page evidence controls. X: Verified Entry-page Evidence (%) = PASS / 7. Y: Google Maps rating. Bubble area scales with review count. Maps supplies discovery and reputation metadata; ALO supplies the entry-page evidence. This is not a composite market score. The dark outline marks the focal business. All plotted web evidence uses peer_probe_v1, including the focal business; a probe is not a full audit. peer_probe_v1 · Representative branch entry-page probe; the full audit covers the brand/root. peer_probe_v1 · Peer probe only; no full audit linked. peer_probe_v1 · Peer probe only; no full audit linked. peer_probe_v1 · Peer probe only; no full audit linked. peer_probe_v1 · Peer probe only; no full audit linked. peer_probe_v1 · Peer probe only; no full audit linked. ALO.NET Audited Cohort: Compatible saved full audits. This population and its historical axes are separate from Local Market web probes.Representative Local Market · Dedeman Konya Hotel & Convention Center
Evaluated local points
Business / website Distance First seen on internet Online age PASS % Maps rating Reviews Evaluation / provenance You · Dedeman Konya Hotel & Convention Center
dedeman.com0 m Apr 14, 2002 24y 5m 0% 4.5 8635 Control evidence
2026-10-12T14:05:48+00:00 · ALO entry-page evaluation + Google Places metadataAnemon Konya Hotel
anemonhotels.com550 m Not verified Not verified 14.3% 4 3803 Control evidence
2026-10-12T14:06:31+00:00 · ALO entry-page evaluation + Google Places metadataDemosan City Hotel
demosancityotel.com1198 m Not verified Not verified 28.6% 3.7 1539 Control evidence
2026-10-12T14:06:31+00:00 · ALO entry-page evaluation + Google Places metadataPaşapark Hotels & Residence Selçuklu
pasapark.com.tr1276 m Not verified Not verified 0% 4.2 765 Control evidence
2026-10-12T14:06:31+00:00 · ALO entry-page evaluation + Google Places metadataNovotel Konya
accor.com1529 m Not verified Not verified 57.1% 4.6 6596 Control evidence
2026-10-12T11:57:17+00:00 · ALO entry-page evaluation + Google Places metadataOzkaymak Park Restaurant
ozkaymakhotels.com.tr1674 m Not verified Not verified 0% 3.5 472 Control evidence
2026-10-12T14:06:32+00:00 · ALO entry-page evaluation + Google Places metadataEvidence data and provenance
Scope Representative Local Market · Dedeman Konya Hotel & Convention Center Audited root/entity https://www.dedeman.com/ Selected physical unit Dedeman Konya Hotel & Convention Center Unit type hotel Matched locations 12 Sector control pack hospitality_local_positioning_v1 First-party entry URL https://www.dedeman.com/oteller/dedeman-konya2 Entry selection Selected from the persisted first-party and Maps identity evidence. Selection provenance Deterministic qualified hotel identity in review-volume order; property transport does not change the selected hotel. Full audit evidence This audit evaluates the submitted entity. Representative entry-page evidence does not replace the full audit identity or evidence. Focal property transport 0 bounded transport attempt(s); selected hotel unchanged. Focal evidence state Usable independently evaluated entry-page evidence. Qualified branch order Dedeman Konya Hotel & Convention Center → Dedeman Bostancı Istanbul Hotel & Convention Center → Dedeman Tokat → Park Dedeman Denizli → Dedeman Palandoken Ski Lodge → Dedeman Şanlıurfa → Dedeman Palandoken Hotel → Dedeman Kayseri → Elina Managed by Dedeman Samsun → Rest & More by Dedeman Mersin Erdemli → Dedeman Adana → Dedeman Güre-Nurhayat Thermal Resort & Spa Representative branches considered in order Dedeman Konya Hotel & Convention Center Selected unit Maps rating 4.5 Selected unit Maps reviews 8635 Entry-page evidence Evaluated with the sector control pack. Competitor probing 5 genuine local peer website probes were evaluated.
X: Verified Checks, 0-100 (this audit's eligible-control scale is planned to expand toward 100). Y: verified passes across 26 shared evaluated controls, shown as a count, not a percent. Marker size scales with Verified Checks; legend order and color are identity-only, not a leaderboard.Brand Verified Checks Shared passes You 29/61 12/26 midtown-hotel.com 40/66 16/26 cactushotels.com 37/62 15/26 asperahotel.com 28/58 11/26 akkahotels.com 24/58 10/26 accor.com 38/62 14/26
Observed weakness: Machine-readable business clarity is the selected weakness. Organisation and entity schema was not detected in the audited crawl. This is high-confidence search and entity evidence. It does not verify search eligibility, visibility or customer response. see details ↓
Observed strength: Public review position against the verified peer set is the selected strength: 4.5/5.0 and 8,635 reviews versus a peer age-adjusted median of 2,840. This is medium-confidence competitive evidence within the publishable comparable cohort; it does not prove market leadership, preference, conversion or revenue. see details ↓
Management Decision: Management should assign a named owner and review date to machine-readable business clarity, then use a relevant first-party journey indicator to test whether the exposure is reduced. It should preserve public review position against the verified peer set as a managed public strength while keeping the conclusion within the cited confidence, cohort and measurement limits. see details ↓
Supporting Market Evidence: Within the Türkiye audit market, Google Maps identified 12 qualified location listings associated with the audited entity. This is market-bounded evidence, not a complete worldwide physical footprint. see details ↓
machine-readable business clarity: Observed evidence: Organisation and entity schema was not detected in the audited crawl. Why management should care: Search platforms may receive an incomplete relationship between the brand, properties and accommodation offer. What could go wrong: Properties and offers may be represented inconsistently across machine-mediated discovery, complicating guest choice. see details ↓
public review position against the verified peer set: Observed evidence: 4.5/5.0 and 8,635 reviews versus a peer age-adjusted median of 2,840. Management value: The property can lose shortlist confidence to hospitality alternatives with stronger public proof. The public signal should be protected, but it is not proof of a commercial outcome. see details ↓
customer-facing governance: Observed evidence: Legal Check evaluated Guest-data transparency was incomplete and Legal entity / controller clarity was incomplete. Why management should care: Management may be less able to reconstruct the relevant guest-facing disclosure and the responsible-entity statement presented at the booking or guest-data decision point. see details ↓
Audit Scope: Audit market: Türkiye. The market was estimated from the auditor's IP connection at submission. Google SERP and Google Maps evidence is limited to this market, including for global brands; the audit does not automatically classify the entity as global or regional. see details ↓
90 days Priorities
- Do Brand, Digital and Operations agree on the canonical entity, location and offer relationships that public platforms should understand? see details ↓
- What evidence will demonstrate that the selected corrective action changed the measured outcome? see details ↓
- Which operating decision will address the verified peer gap, and which leading indicator will the executive team review monthly? see details ↓
90-Day Priority Actions
- Correct the measured structured-data weakness, then validate.Measured evidence supports a bounded remediation; ranking uses the recorded score gap, relevance weight, confidence and actionability.
- Review and correct the measured policy-disclosure weakness.Measured evidence supports a bounded remediation; ranking uses the recorded score gap, relevance weight, confidence and actionability.
- Review the observed product or service markup gap and add accurate markup where applicable.The stored snapshot records a measured evidence rationale and bounded remediation assessment.
Google PageSpeed/SEO — www.dedeman.com
Page speed shapes first impressions before a single word is read. A low Performance score — especially on mobile — means visitors leave before engaging. Google uses Core Web Vitals as a ranking signal, so poor speed hurts discoverability. The SEO score here reflects technical crawlability only, not full SEO strength. Accessibility measures inclusivity. Best Practices flags security and standards compliance. Together, these reveal how seriously the digital asset is maintained.
Evidence details ▾
Mobile: PASS (1502.5151573235 ms) [stale]; Desktop: WARN (3287.174659715 ms) [stale]. Lighthouse lab measurement of the tested entry; not field Core Web Vitals.
Mobile: PASS (0.00016745462692429 unitless) [stale]; Desktop: PASS (0.041802367431564 unitless) [stale]. Lighthouse lab measurement of the tested entry; not field Core Web Vitals.
Mobile: WARN (226 ms) [stale]; Desktop: PASS (36.5 ms) [stale]. Lab main-thread blocking proxy; not field INP or verified real-user responsiveness.
Mobile: FAIL [stale]; Desktop: FAIL [stale]. Automated tested-page markup finding; not whole-site accessibility or WCAG compliance.
Mobile: PASS [stale]; Desktop: FAIL [stale]. Automated tested-page markup finding; not whole-site accessibility or WCAG compliance.
Mobile: PASS [stale]; Desktop: PASS [stale]. Tested entry indexing directives only; no proof of search inclusion, robots access or whole-site crawlability. Intentional noindex needs publisher review.
Maps/Nearby presentation refreshed from this audit's retained evidence on 2026-10-13T19:42:29+00:00. Original audit date, findings and scores are unchanged.
Google Maps Reviews
Retained Google Places source records are shown below with their qualification limits. These records do not contribute to the audited-unit aggregate or the measured Nearby comparison.
- Dedeman Ordu — Website: https://www.dedeman.com/en/hotels/park-dedeman-plus-ordu; Google rating: unavailable; reviews: unavailable; recorded type: hotel. The record has not passed the operating-unit identity and eligibility checks.
- Rest by Dedeman Bursa Nilüfer — Website: https://www.dedeman.com/; Google rating: unavailable; reviews: unavailable; recorded type: hotel. The record has not passed the operating-unit identity and eligibility checks.
Competitive Google Maps Review Volume vs Comparable Peers
Above peer marketCurrent review footprint - not Review Momentum and not age-normalized.
The audited listing's current Google Maps review footprint is above comparable peers in the local competitive set.
11 comparable Google Maps peers | Medium sample confidence | cohort validity: limited | current raw review-count distribution | ALO.NET methodology | calculated 2026-10-12 | the local market around the audited location | Attempted radii: 2 km, 5 km, 8 km, 15 km.
Competitive Reputation Position
Above-median peer positionTwo validated Google Maps peer percentiles shown together - not a synthetic score.
Bubbles prioritize the highest-review paired peers; all paired peers remain in both axis statistics.
- 1. Novotel Konya · 4.6 / 6,596
- 2. Anemon Konya Hotel · 4.0 / 3,803
- 3. ibis Konya · 4.2 / 3,492
- 4. Bera Konya Hotel · 4.3 / 3,093
- 5. Selçuk Otel · 4.5 / 2,088
- 6. Ramada Encore by Wyndha… · 4.3 / 1,762
- 7. Özkaymak Konya Otel · 3.9 / 1,628
- 8. Demosan City Hotel · 3.7 / 1,539
- 9. BAYKARA OTEL · 4.1 / 1,484
- 10. Safa Royal Müze Hotel · 3.9 / 1,448
- 11. Dündar Otel · 4.1 / 1,401
Competitive read: Both signals are above the qualified-peer median; limited cohort validity prevents a decision-grade market classification.
11 paired comparable Google Maps peers | Medium sample confidence | cohort validity: limited | shared persisted Rating ∩ Review Volume peer-ID denominator | median crosshair = paired-cohort 50th percentile | ALO.NET methodology | calculated 2026-10-12 | Attempted radii: 2 km, 5 km, 8 km, 15 km.
ALO.NET KPI Profile
Six-pillar evidence coverage and status distribution. Verified Checks remains separate and no KPI maturity score is inferred.
Where is verified KPI evidence concentrated?
Raw deterministic evidence states are compared across all six approved pillars. Bar length is a count, not maturity or a KPI score.
Canonical findings and evidence ownership
Verified capabilities and gaps retain their evidence scope. Source observations do not prove rendered interaction. Findings are ordered by status and control ID; commercial impact is not ranked.
Online Discoverability
- Verified capability: Facebook profile linkage · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Instagram profile linkage · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: X profile linkage · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: YouTube profile linkage · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Entry-page indexing directives · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface — Mobile: PASS [stale]; Desktop: PASS [stale]. Tested entry indexing directives only; no proof of search inclusion, robots access or whole-site crawlability. Intentional noindex needs publisher review.
- Verified capability: Publisher description quality · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Publisher title quality · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: LinkedIn profile linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Pinterest profile linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: TikTok profile linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Declared location linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: Search result language consistency · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
Reputation & Trust
- Verified capability: Facebook public profile presence · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: Instagram public profile presence · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: X public profile presence · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: YouTube public profile presence · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: Comparable rating position · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: Matched listing rating · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: About identity evidence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Site icon presence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Cross-channel visual identity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Facebook visual identity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Instagram visual identity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: YouTube visual identity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Secure connection · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Blocklist exposure · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: DMARC policy · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: SPF policy · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: LinkedIn public profile presence · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: LinkedIn visual identity · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: X visual identity · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Content freshness evidence · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
Website Experience & Performance
- Verified capability: Accessible button names · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface — Mobile: PASS [stale]; Desktop: PASS [stale]. Automated tested-page markup finding; not whole-site accessibility or WCAG compliance.
- Verified capability: Layout stability (lab) · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface — Mobile: PASS (0.00016745462692429 unitless) [stale]; Desktop: PASS (0.041802367431564 unitless) [stale]. Lighthouse lab measurement of the tested entry; not field Core Web Vitals.
- Verified capability: Desktop lab performance · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Mobile lab performance · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Responsive viewport declaration · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Form input labels · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface — Mobile: PASS [stale]; Desktop: FAIL [stale]. Automated tested-page markup finding; not whole-site accessibility or WCAG compliance.
- Verified gap: Accessible link names · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface — Mobile: FAIL [stale]; Desktop: FAIL [stale]. Automated tested-page markup finding; not whole-site accessibility or WCAG compliance.
- Verified gap: Blocking responsiveness proxy (lab) · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface — Mobile: WARN (226 ms) [stale]; Desktop: PASS (36.5 ms) [stale]. Lab main-thread blocking proxy; not field INP or verified real-user responsiveness.
- Verified gap: Largest contentful paint (lab) · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface — Mobile: PASS (1502.5151573235 ms) [stale]; Desktop: WARN (3287.174659715 ms) [stale]. Lighthouse lab measurement of the tested entry; not field Core Web Vitals.
- Verified gap: Accessibility markup basics · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Image format hygiene · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
Measurement & Conversion Readiness
- Verified gap: Directions markup actionability · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Email markup actionability · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Analytics script declaration · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface — Not detected from the inspected entry source; deferred or consent-dependent loading remains possible. Presence does not establish execution, events, conversions or form delivery.
- Verified gap: Tag manager declaration · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface — Not detected from the inspected entry source; deferred or consent-dependent loading remains possible. Presence does not establish execution, events, conversions or form delivery.
- Evidence gap: Rendered interaction evidence · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Contact path evidence · UNAVAILABLE · Publisher-controlled surface
- Source observation: Phone markup actionability · INFORMATIONAL · Publisher-controlled surface — The observed phone value has a matching native action in source markup.
- Source observation: Primary CTA markup · INFORMATIONAL · Publisher-controlled surface — At least one primary CTA exposes a native destination or form action in source markup.
Semantic & AI Readiness
- Verified capability: Brand Mentioned · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: Own Domain Exposed · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: Query / Page Match · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: Search / Fan-out Observed · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified gap: Brand Recommended · FAIL · Platform evidence
- Verified gap: Conversion intent alignment · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Navigation intent alignment · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Primary offer clarity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Local business structured identity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Breadcrumb structured data · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Product or service structured identity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Organization structured identity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Review structured data · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Search result message relevance · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: Citation-free Mention · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: Locale content coherence · UNAVAILABLE · Publisher-controlled surface
Legal & Privacy Governance
- Verified capability: Benchmark legal quality · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Implementation legal quality · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Cookie notice presence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Privacy policy presence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Jurisdiction legal quality · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Sector legal quality · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Guest Data Transparency · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Hotel / Operator Legal Identity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: On-site Legal Discoverability & Freshness · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Privacy / Data Protection · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Freshness legal quality · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Booking / Cancellation / Payment Terms · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Cookie & Consent · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Guest Forms & Marketing Consent · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Rights / Privacy Contact · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Third-Party Booking / Data Sharing · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Booking & accommodation terms indexed discoverability · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: Cancellation & refund indexed discoverability · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: Cookie policy indexed discoverability · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: Privacy & data protection indexed discoverability · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: Terms presence · UNAVAILABLE · Publisher-controlled surface
How do Mobile and Desktop Lighthouse results compare?
This compares the stored Lighthouse category results by device; the four categories are not averaged into a new score.
How is Google Maps review volume distributed across matched locations?
Bar length represents review volume only; rating is shown separately in labels and details.
Percentiles withheld: a defensible branch-level peer matching unit was not established.
Accessible KPI evidence table
| Pillar | Evaluated / applicable | PASS | WARN | FAIL | Unverified | Unavailable | Evidence coverage | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Online Discoverability | 7 / 12 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 7 of 12 applicable controls evaluated | Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control |
| Reputation & Trust | 13 / 20 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 13 of 20 applicable controls evaluated | Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control |
| Website Experience & Performance | 11 / 11 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 11 of 11 applicable controls evaluated | Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control |
| Measurement & Conversion Readiness | 4 / 8 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 of 8 applicable controls evaluated | Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control |
| Semantic & AI Readiness | 13 / 16 | 4 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 13 of 16 applicable controls evaluated | Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control |
| Legal & Privacy Governance | 10 / 21 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 10 of 21 applicable controls evaluated | Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control |
Accessible PageSpeed data table
| Device | Performance | Accessibility | Best Practices | SEO | Source collection time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 88 | 91 | 96 | 100 | 2026-10-09T16:00:05.756Z |
| Desktop | 77 | 80 | 100 | 92 | 2026-10-09T16:00:05.169Z |
Accessible Maps location data table
| Location | Reviews | Rating | Focal status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dedeman Konya Hotel & Convention Center | 8635 | 4.5 | Selected focal branch |
| Dedeman Bostancı Istanbul Hotel & Convention Center | 7416 | 4.4 | Matched location |
| Dedeman Tokat | 3475 | 4.6 | Matched location |
| Park Dedeman Denizli | 2893 | 4.3 | Matched location |
| Dedeman Palandoken Ski Lodge | 2817 | 4.6 | Matched location |
| Dedeman Şanlıurfa | 2784 | 4.0 | Matched location |
| Dedeman Palandoken Hotel | 2758 | 4.3 | Matched location |
| Dedeman Kayseri | 1897 | 4.7 | Matched location |
| Elina Managed by Dedeman Samsun | 807 | 4.7 | Matched location |
| Rest & More by Dedeman Mersin Erdemli | 758 | 4.7 | Matched location |
| Dedeman Adana | 530 | 4.7 | Matched location |
| Dedeman Güre-Nurhayat Thermal Resort & Spa | 521 | 4.4 | Matched location |
Measurement & Conversion Readiness
Evidence details ▾
Not detected from the inspected entry source; deferred or consent-dependent loading remains possible. Presence does not establish execution, events, conversions or form delivery.
Not detected from the inspected entry source; deferred or consent-dependent loading remains possible. Presence does not establish execution, events, conversions or form delivery.
Google-Indexed Legal Discoverability
Indexed-search discoverability only. This is separate from audited-site presence in Trust Basics and content completeness in Legal Check.
Not evaluated — the remaining audit execution budget was reserved for other report checks.
This control reviews indexed-search discoverability only. It does not establish that a document is current or present on the live website, and legal compliance was not verified.
Legal Check (Sectoral & Jurisdiction Legal Intelligence)
ip_estimateScore Breakdown
Top Legal Gaps
- Strengthen the public privacy notice with clearly layered purposes, legal basis, rights, transfers and retention information.
Sector-Critical Findings
Benchmark summary: Comparison covers discoverability, coverage, policy layering, hospitality specialization, localization, rights mechanisms and observable implementation; it does not compare legal text similarity or certify legal equivalence.
Evidence Ledger
Evidence scope: legal completeness and applicability. A Trust Basics PASS can confirm that a public surface was detected while this card still reports WARN for incomplete content. Indexed-search availability is assessed separately and does not override either result.
Verified Legal Topics
Evaluated Legal Criteria
Core Legal Surfaces
Consent & Implementation
Benchmark Reference Records
How this score is calculated: Legal Check combines applicable jurisdiction/market transparency (45%), sector-specific legal transparency (25%), observable implementation (15%), maturity against curated sector benchmarks (10%), and freshness/ownership signals (5%). The audit evaluates public website evidence for online-reputation and transparency purposes; it is not a legal opinion or certification.
Audit-market context: The market is taken from the country selected for the audit. If no country is selected, ALO.NET Audit estimates the market from the auditor’s IP connection. Market context guides localized comparison; it does not by itself determine the audited company’s governing law.
Benchmark corpus: Comparison uses a versioned, periodically reviewed benchmark and regulatory-reference corpus. Legal pages and guidance can change over time, so the result reflects the corpus version and evidence collected for this audit.
Engine legal-check-engine-v1.0.0 · Jurisdiction pack tr-legal-transparency-v1.0.0 · Corpus hospitality-benchmarks-2026-q3-v1
Competitive Reputation Context
Directional benchmark: For the selected focal branch, the current Google Maps review footprint is above, with 8,635 reviews compared with a qualified-peer median of 1,762. Its 4.5 rating remains above the peer median of 4.1. This branch-level comparison does not represent the complete multi-location brand. This comparison applies only to the documented Google Maps cohort and does not classify overall online reputation. Separately observed organisation and entity schema not detected in the audited crawl may weaken booking confidence.
Comparable peers must match sector, business model, brand scale and market context. Each reputation platform is interpreted as its own layer; Google Maps ratings are not blended with Tripadvisor, Trustpilot, OTA, social, SERP or PageSpeed signals.
Public reviews directly influence booking confidence. Weak review scores, weak OTA or Maps visibility, poor mobile speed, and unclear brand/entity signals should be read as revenue and booking-confidence risks, not only SEO issues.
Sector classification is based on bounded audited-root evidence. Each row-level observation remains separately limited by its stated crawl, provider and verification conditions.
Semantic Check
This marketing-oriented comparison examines whether homepage promise, navigation intent and conversion actions remain semantically coherent across the public website evidence collected for this audit.
Evaluated findings may contribute to Verified Checks, which is separate from the future 100-point KPI score. A Not verifiable Navigation-to-Landing Alignment is a WARN coverage state, never a failure; other unavailable, unverified and informational evidence is excluded.
Concrete offer language is observable, but the primary homepage promise relies partly on supporting copy for clarity.
- Dedeman Hotels & Resorts International, Türkiye'nin 37 şehri ve 6 ülkede olmak üzere 52 otelimiz ile sizleri ağırlamayı bekliyoruz. — https://www.dedeman.com/
The phone CTA is actionable, but its tel: target is domestic-only and does not expose an international dialing prefix.
- 444 3366 — tel:4443366
Not verifiable: The declared page locale and footer prose could not be compared with sufficient linguistic confidence.
The live brand-search description provides substantive non-legal copy that can introduce the brand or page offer.
- Dedeman Oteller. Dedeman Bostancı · Park Dedeman Bostancı · Park Dedeman Denizli · Park Dedeman Elazığ · Dedeman Erbil · Park Dedeman Eskişehir ... — https://loyalclub.dedeman.com/
Frontend Interaction Check
This interaction-oriented review examines whether public contact details and conversion controls expose usable native actions in the collected website evidence.
Source markup does not by itself prove visual clickability. A Not observed contact or CTA input is a FAIL only after accessible bounded source evidence was evaluated; browser-required, restricted and unverified observations are excluded from Verified Checks and canonical KPI scoring.
The observed phone value has a matching native action in source markup.
Email contact text was not reliably observed in the bounded homepage evidence.
Address contact text was not reliably observed in the bounded homepage evidence.
At least one primary CTA exposes a native destination or form action in source markup.
Not verifiable: Source markup cannot prove visual affordance, pointer hit testing, overlay interference, focus visibility or runtime activation.
Logo Consistency Check
Favicon / Site Icon
Trust Basic Web Scraping
Evidence scope: audited-site observation. A green dot means the signal was detected from the audited entry point or bounded first-party evidence. It does not mean the same information was available to the indexed-search provider or that its legal completeness was verified.
Insufficient evidence for a Trust Score. The badge reports detected ten-item Trust Basics; unresolved criteria remain neutral and are not counted as failures.
Schema.org Basic Check
Google SERP Preview
Google SERP stands for Google Search Engine Results Page — the page of results shown when someone searches online for a brand, product, person, service, or related topic. It is often the very first impression a potential customer, partner, or journalist has of the searched entity. Optimizing these elements is frequently one of the highest-return SEO actions available, because it can influence click-through rate before the visitor ever lands on the website.
Source: captured Google organic results for the recorded query. The primary preview requires a URL matching the audited entry or its root locale; other domain pages are disclosed separately.
No audited-entry result was captured in this query. The other domain page below is not the brand homepage preview.
Audited publisher metadata · not captured Google result copy
Other captured domain page · not the audited entry
loyalclub.dedeman.comAI Search Readiness
Six query-scoped observations distinguish page matching, search-assisted answers, source exposure, brand mentions and recommendations. These observations describe the captured query and response, not general AI visibility or ranking. Unverified observations are excluded from Check Score.
Measured observations: 5/6 · Unverified: 1/6. Check Score uses the evaluated observations.
Audited AI query: Dedeman Hotels & Resorts International aileler için tatil için önerilir mi?
BRANDED AI QUERY FETCHED PUBLISHER SOURCE
Query: Dedeman Hotels & Resorts International aileler için tatil için önerilir mi? · Observed: 2026-10-12T14:04:14+00:00
https://www.dedeman.com/SEARCH ASSISTED AI ANSWER CAPTURED
Query: Dedeman Hotels & Resorts International aileler için tatil için önerilir mi? · Observed: 2026-10-12T14:04:14+00:00
OWN DOMAIN IN AI REFERENCES
Query: Dedeman Hotels & Resorts International aileler için tatil için önerilir mi? · Observed: 2026-10-12T14:04:14+00:00
EXACT BRAND IN AI ANSWER
Query: Dedeman Hotels & Resorts International aileler için tatil için önerilir mi? · Observed: 2026-10-12T14:04:14+00:00
NO SUPPORTED EXPLICIT RECOMMENDATION
Query: Dedeman Hotels & Resorts International aileler için tatil için önerilir mi? · Observed: 2026-10-12T14:04:14+00:00
No complete, scope-matched observation was captured for this measurement.
Captured answer and citations
Partial captured mapping; unresolved sources remain unverified. Links show provider attachments to answer blocks; source support for every claim is not independently verified.
Dedeman Hotels & Resorts International, Türkiye’nin köklü ve öncü otel zincirlerinden biridir. İlk otelini 1966 yılında Ankara'da açan Dedeman Grubu, bugün Türkiye'nin pek çok şehrinde ve yurt dışında (kazakistan, Irak gibi ülkelerde) misafirlerini ağırlamaktadır.
Geniş Hizmet Ağı: Şehir otelciliği, kongre ve convention center'lar, termal tatil köyleri ve resort oteller dahil olmak üzere geniş bir konsept yelpazesi sunar.
Popüler Bazı Lokasyonlar: İstanbul (örn. Dedeman Bostancı), Ankara, Antalya (Kemer), Balıkesir (Güre Termal) ve Mersin gibi Türkiye'nin farklı bölgelerinde tesisleri bulunur.
Source destination not resolved.
Rezervasyon ve Bilgi: Otellerin güncel konumlarına, oda seçeneklerine ve rezervasyon işlemlerine resmi Dedeman Hotels & Resorts International Web Sitesi üzerinden ulaşabilirsiniz.
Belirli bir şehir veya bölge için Dedeman oteli arıyorsanız ya da rezervasyon tarihleri hakkında bilgi istiyorsanız, detayları paylaşarak size yardımcı olmamı sağlayabilirsiniz.
Supporting technical observations
About: PASS · Contact: UNVERIFIED · Schema types: . Technical presence supports interpretation; it does not prove an AI answer, recommendation, citation or indexing.
