Online Reputation Audit: delphinhotel.com

Home | Delphin Hotels & Resorts — Hospitality

www.delphinhotel.com

Audited 20 Oct 2026, 12:19 UTC

See historic audits

Evidence Captured (%)Check Score (/100)

Approved audits, including the current report. Hover or focus a point for values; select it to open the report.

3 Oct 202605:02 UTC

5 Oct 202618:32 UTC

20 Oct 202612:19 UTCCurrent

Audit date (UTC)

Online Reputation Audit

Executive Summary

64/100

Check Score

(36/56 Verified Checks)

6/10

Trust Basics

55/88

Evidence Captured

Feb 2, 2001

First Seen On Internet

4.6 / 5.0

Matched Listings Avg. Rating

11,775

Reviews Across Matched Listings

31/100

Mobile PageSpeed

36/56Verified Checks

Checks Passed

56 checks were evaluated within the available access and audit scope. 36 are PASS; 13 are WARN and 7 are FAIL. These counts show the results of evaluated checks, not a weighted quality score.

PASS 36WARN 13FAIL 7

Executive Scoreboard

Legal Check5/10

5 pass · 5 warn · 0 fail

AI Search Readiness4/5

4 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail

Frontend Interaction Check4/5

4 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail

Semantic Quality3/4

3 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail

PageSpeed & SEO Quality0/2

0 pass · 0 warn · 2 fail

Maps & Review Metrics1/1

1 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail

Structured Data1/5

1 pass · 4 warn · 0 fail

Social PresenceUnavailable

Not evaluated

Search Presence3/4

3 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail

Social Links4/4

4 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail

Executive Strength / Risk

Strongest evaluated areaGoogle Maps peer evidence4.6/5.0 and 7,618 reviews versus a peer age-adjusted median of 10,534Jump to section

Management attentionDecision-point legal evidenceLegal Check evaluated Guest-data transparency (PARTIAL)Jump to section

Evidence coverage: 55/88. 33 eligible controls remain unverified or unavailable. Check Score reflects evaluated checks only.

Evidence availability

Social Presence: Collection was not started within the remaining audit time.

(Cached evidence · captured 20 Oct 2026 UTC; live access not rechecked)

This audit provides a consolidated executive view of how a brand’s digital presence supports—or weakens—its online reputation and the value of its digital investments. It evaluates key public indicators across semantic visibility, technical performance, legal and trust signals, platform consistency, reputation strength, and sector-specific competitive context. Rather than treating these signals in isolation, the audit examines their relationships and relevant correlations with commercial performance. Its final goal is to give senior executives a clear, evidence-based basis for identifying gaps, challenging internal assumptions, prioritizing corrective action, and making better-informed digital investment decisions.

Delphin Hotels & Resorts's website describes a portfolio of hotel properties. Its website highlights Delphin Imperial and Delphin Be Grand Resort. The matched Google Maps listing records 4.6/5 from 7,618 reviews. The website links to Instagram, Facebook and YouTube profiles. The captured AI answer mentions the brand in response to the audited query. Further service details and geographic coverage are not added where the collected profile does not substantiate them.

Representative Local Market · Delphin Imperial Hotel

Nearby evidence completed in the background at 2026-10-20 12:21:07 UTC. Audit scores and original findings are unchanged.

Delphin Imperial Hotel is the representative hotel selected from 2 matched locations.

Verified Evidence Positioning Map (Nearby Peers)

Comparison scope: Representative local hotel market · within 2 km of Delphin Imperial Hotel (selected as a representative branch from 2 matched locations). 5 local businesses were independently evaluated using the same 7 ALO.NET homepage evidence controls.

X: Brand homepage PASS% = PASS / 7. Y: Google Maps rating. Bubble area scales with review count. Maps supplies discovery and reputation metadata; ALO supplies the homepage evidence. This is not a composite market score. The dark outline marks the focal business. All plotted web evidence uses peer_probe_v1, including the focal business; a probe is not a full audit.

Evaluated local points

Business / website	Distance	First seen on internet	Brand homepage PASS%	Maps rating	Reviews	Evaluation / provenance
You · Delphin Imperial Hotel delphinhotel.com	0 m	Feb 2, 2001	28.6%	4.6	7618	Control evidence peer_probe_v1 · Representative branch entry-page probe; the full audit covers the brand/root. 2026-10-20T12:18:46+00:00 · ALO entry-page evaluation + Google Places metadata schema.organization: PASS. Detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source schema.local_business: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source schema.product_service: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source schema.review: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source schema.breadcrumb: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source semantic.primary_offer_clarity: PASS. The homepage primary promise names a concrete offer and supporting copy reinforces the same commercial meaning. Source semantic.locale_content_coherence: UNVERIFIED. The declared page locale and footer prose could not be compared with sufficient linguistic confidence. Source
Corendon Grand Park Lara corendonhotels.com.tr	281 m	Not verified	28.6%	4.5	13826	Control evidence peer_probe_v1 · Peer probe only; no full audit linked. 2026-10-20T12:20:29+00:00 · ALO entry-page evaluation + Google Places metadata schema.organization: PASS. Detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source schema.local_business: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source schema.product_service: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source schema.review: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source schema.breadcrumb: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source semantic.primary_offer_clarity: WARN. Concrete offer language is observable, but the primary homepage promise relies partly on supporting copy for clarity. Source semantic.locale_content_coherence: PASS. The evaluated first-party footer prose is coherent with the explicitly declared page locale. Source
Concorde De Luxe Resort concordehotels.com	672 m	Not verified	28.6%	4.8	13615	Control evidence peer_probe_v1 · Peer probe only; no full audit linked. 2026-10-20T12:20:29+00:00 · ALO entry-page evaluation + Google Places metadata schema.organization: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source schema.local_business: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source schema.product_service: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source schema.review: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source schema.breadcrumb: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source semantic.primary_offer_clarity: PASS. The homepage primary promise names a concrete offer and supporting copy reinforces the same commercial meaning. Source semantic.locale_content_coherence: PASS. The evaluated first-party footer prose is coherent with the explicitly declared page locale. Source
Limak Lara De Luxe Hotel & Resort limakhotels.com	791 m	Not verified	14.3%	4.7	19671	Control evidence peer_probe_v1 · Peer probe only; no full audit linked. 2026-10-20T12:21:06+00:00 · ALO entry-page evaluation + Google Places metadata schema.organization: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source schema.local_business: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source schema.product_service: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source schema.review: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source schema.breadcrumb: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source semantic.primary_offer_clarity: PASS. The homepage primary promise names a concrete offer and supporting copy reinforces the same commercial meaning. Source semantic.locale_content_coherence: UNVERIFIED. The declared page locale and footer prose could not be compared with sufficient linguistic confidence. Source
Titanic Beach Lara titanic.com.tr	925 m	Not verified	28.6%	4.8	17239	Control evidence peer_probe_v1 · Peer probe only; no full audit linked. 2026-10-20T12:21:06+00:00 · ALO entry-page evaluation + Google Places metadata schema.organization: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source schema.local_business: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source schema.product_service: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source schema.review: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source schema.breadcrumb: PASS. Detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source semantic.primary_offer_clarity: PASS. The homepage primary promise names a concrete offer and supporting copy reinforces the same commercial meaning. Source semantic.locale_content_coherence: UNVERIFIED. The declared page locale and footer prose could not be compared with sufficient linguistic confidence. Source
Miracle Hotel miraclehotel.com	1063 m	Not verified	42.9%	4.4	8477	Control evidence peer_probe_v1 · Peer probe only; no full audit linked. 2026-10-20T12:18:59+00:00 · ALO entry-page evaluation + Google Places metadata schema.organization: PASS. Detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source schema.local_business: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source schema.product_service: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source schema.review: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source schema.breadcrumb: WARN. Not detected in the evaluated entry-page markup. Source semantic.primary_offer_clarity: PASS. The homepage primary promise names a concrete offer and supporting copy reinforces the same commercial meaning. Source semantic.locale_content_coherence: PASS. The evaluated first-party footer prose is coherent with the explicitly declared page locale. Source

Evidence data and provenance

Scope	Representative Local Market · Delphin Imperial Hotel
Audited root/entity	https://www.delphinhotel.com/
Selected physical unit	Delphin Imperial Hotel
Unit type	hotel
Matched locations	2
Sector control pack	hospitality_local_positioning_v1
First-party entry URL	https://www.delphinhotel.com/tr/delphin-imperial
Entry selection	Selected from the persisted first-party and Maps identity evidence.
Selection provenance	Deterministic qualified hotel identity in review-volume order; property transport does not change the selected hotel.
Full audit evidence	This audit evaluates the submitted entity. Representative entry-page evidence does not replace the full audit identity or evidence.
Focal property transport	0 bounded transport attempt(s); selected hotel unchanged.
Focal evidence state	Usable independently evaluated entry-page evidence.
Qualified branch order	Delphin Imperial Hotel → Delphin Diva Premiere
Representative branches considered in order	Delphin Imperial Hotel
Selected unit Maps rating	4.6
Selected unit Maps reviews	7618
Entry-page evidence	Evaluated with the sector control pack.
Peer selection	Review-volume reference: 7,618 (selected focal). Closest eligible peers at this volume or higher are preferred; below it, higher counts come first. Sector radius and verified evidence requirements still apply.
Competitor probing	5 genuine local peer website probes were evaluated.

ALO.NET Audited Cohort: Compatible saved full audits. This population and its historical axes are separate from Local Market web probes.

The public decision journey is uneven: customer-facing governance creates the clearest controllable gap, while public review position against the verified peer set supplies the strongest verified reassurance. Taken together, the evidence suggests that guests can encounter credible public proof but still receive an avoidably weak handoff toward direct booking action. Management can therefore protect the established reputation signal while tightening the point where discovery should become action. see details ↓

Observed weakness: Customer-facing governance is the selected weakness. The evaluated disclosures were: Guest-data transparency was incomplete. This high-confidence governance evidence is bounded to the booking or guest-data decision point; it neither proves legal insufficiency nor predicts a guest complaint or dispute. see details ↓

Observed strength: Public review position against the verified peer set is the selected strength: 4.6/5.0 and 7,618 reviews versus a peer age-adjusted median of 10,534. This is medium-confidence competitive evidence within the publishable comparable cohort; it does not prove market leadership, preference, conversion or revenue. see details ↓

Management Decision: Management should assign a named owner and review date to customer-facing governance, then use a relevant first-party journey indicator to test whether the exposure is reduced. It should preserve public review position against the verified peer set as a managed public strength while keeping the conclusion within the cited confidence, cohort and measurement limits. see details ↓

Verified Evidence Positioning (Random Similar Comparable Brands)Comparison scope: Hospitality saved audits. Compatible saved ALO.NET Audit reports only; separate from Google Maps Comparable Peers.Youmidtown-hotel.comgoldenagehotel.comadora.com.trtitanic.com.trcpbursa.com

Brand	Verified Checks	Shared passes
You	36/56	19/32
midtown-hotel.com	43/68	18/32
goldenagehotel.com	20/54	11/32
adora.com.tr	34/60	14/32
titanic.com.tr	42/67	18/32
cpbursa.com	19/49	14/32

X: Verified Checks, 0-100 (this audit's eligible-control scale is planned to expand toward 100). Y: verified passes across 32 shared evaluated controls, shown as a count, not a percent. Marker size scales with Verified Checks; legend order and color are identity-only, not a leaderboard.

Verified Evidence Positioning Analysis: Across 32 controls shared by 6 saved audits, the audited brand passes 19. Its broader result is 36/56 Verified Checks. Its shared-control result meets or exceeds the strongest captured peer result. Review the underlying shared-control gaps before interpreting differences in total coverage. This selected comparison is retained evidence, not a local-market rank or a measure of reputation or commercial performance.

Supporting Market Evidence: Within the Türkiye audit market, Google Maps identified 2 qualified location listings associated with the audited entity. This is market-bounded evidence, not a complete worldwide physical footprint. see details ↓

customer-facing governance: Observed evidence: Legal Check evaluated Guest-data transparency was incomplete. Why management should care: Management may be less able to reconstruct the relevant guest-facing disclosure presented at the booking or guest-data decision point. see details ↓

public review position against the verified peer set: Observed evidence: 4.6/5.0 and 7,618 reviews versus a peer age-adjusted median of 10,534. Management value: The property can lose shortlist confidence to hospitality alternatives with stronger public proof. The public signal should be protected, but it is not proof of a commercial outcome. see details ↓

search-to-booking journey clarity: Observed evidence: A domain-matched live Google result was captured. Management value: The first search interaction may not communicate the offer or next booking step clearly enough for high-intent guests. The public signal should be protected, but it is not proof of a commercial outcome. see details ↓

Audit Scope: Audit market: Türkiye. The market was estimated from the auditor's IP connection at submission. Google SERP and Google Maps evidence is limited to this market, including for global brands; the audit does not automatically classify the entity as global or regional. see details ↓

90 days Priorities

Can the business retrieve the relevant guest-facing disclosure, including the exact version, timestamp and responsible owner, for the relevant guest decision? see details ↓
Which operating decision will address the verified peer gap, and which leading indicator will the executive team review monthly? see details ↓
What proposition and next step should a guest see at the search decision point, and who owns its consistency? see details ↓

90-Day Priority Actions

Improve the measured publisher-controlled search metadata, then recheck.Measured evidence supports a bounded remediation; ranking uses the recorded score gap, relevance weight, confidence and actionability.HighActionable within 90 days
Investigate and remediate measured page-performance friction, then remeasure.Measured evidence supports a bounded remediation; ranking uses the recorded score gap, relevance weight, confidence and actionability.MediumActionable within 90 days
Review the observed product or service markup gap and add accurate markup where applicable.The stored snapshot records a measured evidence rationale and bounded remediation assessment.HighActionable within 90 days

Check Score

Audited online-presence quality indicator: PASS / (PASS + WARN + FAIL) × 100. Unverified and unavailable checks are excluded. This is not an overall brand or revenue score.

Verified Checks

Shows the checks ALO.NET Audit could evaluate using concrete evidence in this report. For example, 20/37 Verified Checks means that 20 of the 37 evaluated checks received PASS; the remainder may be WARN or FAIL. Unavailable, Unverified and excluded checks are outside this total.

Trust Basics

Summarizes basic website trust signals, including organizational identity, contact information, essential policies and trust infrastructure that help visitors and digital systems assess a website. It indicates basic trust hygiene and is neither a legal compliance certificate nor an overall reputation score.

Evidence Captured

Shows how many applicable checks have enough evidence for evaluation. For example, 48/83 means that usable evidence was obtained for 48 of 83 applicable checks. A higher value indicates broader audit coverage; it does not mean that the website performed well.

First Seen On Internet

Shows an estimated date from which the domain can be observed online. This is not the company incorporation date, the age of the brand or the opening date of a physical business. It provides context about the domain’s observable online history.

Matched Listings Avg. Rating

Shows the average user rating of Google Maps business listings reliably matched to the audited brand or website. Only verified entity matches are included; unrelated businesses with the same or a similar name are excluded. A qualified entity match does not necessarily mean that the listing’s Website field matches the audited domain.

Reviews Across Matched Listings

Shows the total number of user reviews across business listings matched to the brand. It indicates the volume of user feedback and provides context about online visibility. Review volume alone does not establish whether feedback is positive or negative.

Mobile PageSpeed

Shows website performance on mobile devices as a 0–100 score measured using Google Lighthouse/PageSpeed methodology. A higher score generally indicates better loading performance and user experience. This technical performance measure is produced by Google and is independent of the ALO.NET Check Score.

Executive Scoreboard

Provides an at-a-glance executive overview of key audit areas. Each row represents a different area and shows its PASS, WARN and FAIL results or the relevant system’s native score. Rows may use different measurement types, so their values should not always be compared directly as equivalent scores.

Legal Check

Examines whether essential legal and privacy information is accessible to users and search systems, together with related requirements that can be evaluated within the audit scope. ALO.NET Audit does not provide legal advice, and this result is not a legal compliance certificate.

AI Search Readiness

Separates captured query/page matching, search-assisted answers, own-domain sources, brand mentions, explicit recommendations and citation-free mentions. Results apply to the recorded query, market and response; unavailable observations remain neutral. Technical presence does not guarantee AI visibility or ranking.

Frontend Interaction Check

Examines visible interface and link signals that help visitors reach core actions such as contacting the business, searching, getting directions or making a reservation. Detecting a button or link does not establish that the corresponding action was successfully completed from end to end.

Semantic Quality

Evaluates structural and semantic signals that help people and machines understand page content. Headings, content relationships and related semantic cues help clarify what a page communicates.

PageSpeed & SEO Quality

Summarizes Google Lighthouse measurements of speed, accessibility, best practices and SEO (Search Engine Optimization), together with technical checks that help search engines crawl and understand the audited page. PASS/WARN/FAIL counts cover evaluated audit checks; native 0–100 scores remain in the details. Results do not guarantee search rankings.

Maps & Review Metrics

Evaluates verifiable Google Maps business listings, user ratings, review volume and, when available, comparable market evidence. Its purpose is to show the measurable portion of the brand’s local digital reputation within the audited scope.

Structured Data

Checks for structured data defined in website source code using standards such as Schema.org. This data can help search engines understand organizations, businesses, products, services and other content more accurately.

Social Presence

Evaluates the online presence of social media profiles verified as belonging to the brand. The result reflects verifiable brand presence, rather than follower counts or social media success.

Search Presence

Evaluates verifiable signals about whether the brand and website can be found by search systems. It shows available search visibility evidence and does not guarantee a ranking for any particular keyword.

Social Links

Checks links from the website’s own pages to the brand’s social media profiles. These links help establish an explicit first-party relationship between the website and the social accounts.

PASS / WARN / FAIL

PASS means sufficient positive evidence was found for the evaluated condition. WARN means the result is partly positive but needs attention. FAIL means an evaluated check did not meet the expected condition. These statuses apply only to checks that could actually be evaluated.

Google PageSpeed/SEO — www.delphinhotel.com

Page speed shapes first impressions before a single word is read. A low Performance score — especially on mobile — means visitors leave before engaging. Google uses Core Web Vitals as a ranking signal, so poor speed hurts discoverability. The SEO score here reflects technical crawlability only, not full SEO strength. Accessibility measures inclusivity. Best Practices flags security and standards compliance. Together, these reveal how seriously the digital asset is maintained.

Mobile

PSI lab run: 2026-10-20T12:18:16.256Z UTC

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Desktop

PSI lab run: 2026-10-20T12:18:16.574Z UTC

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Google PageSpeed SEO score has been multiplied by 0.75. Why? For deep SEO/AIO analysis, please contact info@alo.net.

Evidence details ▾

FAIL Largest contentful paint (lab)

Mobile: FAIL (37733.224449733 ms); Desktop: FAIL (5904.1874020208 ms). Lighthouse lab measurement of the tested entry; not field Core Web Vitals.

PASS Layout stability (lab)

Mobile: PASS (0.0045195398582098 unitless); Desktop: PASS (0.014020246694685 unitless). Lighthouse lab measurement of the tested entry; not field Core Web Vitals.

FAIL Blocking responsiveness proxy (lab)

Mobile: FAIL (1848 ms); Desktop: FAIL (3334.4234881101 ms). Lab main-thread blocking proxy; not field INP or verified real-user responsiveness.

FAIL Accessible button names

Mobile: FAIL; Desktop: FAIL. Automated tested-page markup finding; not whole-site accessibility or WCAG compliance.

FAIL Accessible link names

Mobile: FAIL; Desktop: FAIL. Automated tested-page markup finding; not whole-site accessibility or WCAG compliance.

PASS Entry-page indexing directives

Mobile: PASS; Desktop: PASS. Tested entry indexing directives only; no proof of search inclusion, robots access or whole-site crawlability. Intentional noindex needs publisher review.

Google Maps Reviews

The results below are limited to the Türkiye audit market. This is market-biased Google Maps evidence, not a complete worldwide footprint and not an automatic global/regional brand classification.

Matched listings average rating: 4.6 (pass). 2 Maps matches found for www.delphinhotel.com

11,775

Reviews Across Matched Listings

4.6 ★★★★★

Matched Listings Avg. Rating

Maps Matches

ALO.NET Peer Benchmark — based on current Google Maps data

Default focal branch: Delphin Imperial Hotel

Automatically selected from qualified mature listings, prioritizing audited-site identity and Website domain linkage, then Google review volume.

This is a branch-level comparison and does not represent the complete multi-location brand.

Other eligible branches require branch selection for separate benchmarking.

Based on 23 quality-qualified current operational-location peers in the local market around the audited location expanded up to 15 km, the current review-footprint distribution is kept separate from age-adjusted eligibility. Cohort validity: limited; sample confidence: Medium.

Age-adjusted review volume uses 23 eligible peers. At the focal listing's observed online age, P25 / median / P75 are 4,334 / 10,534 / 17,019 reviews; the audited listing has 7,618.

Its 4.6 Google rating is above the peer median of 4.5. Rating-eligible peer sample: 23. Audited rating percentile: 65th percentile.

Sector / business model / scale: Hospitality / Hotel group / Local · Observed online age band: 5+ years · Signal confidence: confirmed_public_signal · Benchmark confidence: Medium · Cohort validity: limited · Calculation date: 2026-10-20

Source: Google Maps · Benchmark methodology: ALO.NET

Google Maps listing photo · Delphin Imperial Hotel

Photo credit: Delphin Imperial Hotel

Delphin Imperial Hotel Google Maps ↗

4.6 ★★★★★ (7,618 reviews)

/tr/delphin-imperial

Google Maps listing photo · Delphin Diva Premiere

Photo credit: Delphin Diva Premiere Hotel

Delphin Diva Premiere Google Maps ↗

4.7 ★★★★★ (4,157 reviews)

/tr/delphin-diva

Competitive Google Maps Rating vs Comparable Peers

Above peer median

Competitive Google Maps peer analysis - not a generic score.

Audited Rating4.6

P25 4.4Peer median 4.5P75 4.7

65thAudited percentile

+0.1Rating gap vs peer median

23 | MediumPeer sample | confidence

The audited brand's Google rating is above comparable peers in the local competitive set.

Why it matters: Comparable Peers are nearby, currently operating Google Maps businesses that passed the same business-type and brand-exclusion checks. They are the local competitive set, not a generic industry average.

Audited Brand: The marker represents Delphin Imperial Hotel. It was selected from the eligible established listings matched to the audited brand because it has the highest current review count; rating and Place ID only resolve ties.

Competitive Google Maps Review Volume vs Comparable Peers

Above peer market

Current review footprint - not Review Momentum and not age-normalized.

Audited Reviews7,618

P25 3,153Peer median 4,623P75 8,050

70thAudited percentile

1.7xReview count vs peer median

23 | MediumPeer sample | confidence

The audited listing's current Google Maps review footprint is above comparable peers in the local competitive set.

Competitive Reputation Position

Above-median peer position

Two validated Google Maps peer percentiles shown together - not a synthetic score.

Bubbles prioritize the highest-review paired peers; all paired peers remain in both axis statistics. 23 paired comparable peers analyzed · 12 highest-review peers shown

Brand	Rating	Reviews
Aska Lara Resort & SPA	4.7	20,050
Limak Lara De Luxe Hotel & Resort	4.7	19,671
Titanic Beach Lara	4.8	17,239
Corendon Grand Park Lara	4.5	13,826
Concorde De Luxe Resort	4.8	13,615
Miracle Hotel	4.4	8,477

Brand	Rating	Reviews
Adalya Elite Lara	4.6	7,623
Crystal Centro	4.8	7,304
Sherwood Exclusive Lara	4.4	7,040
Barut Lara	4.8	6,662
Royal Seginus Hotel	4.3	6,610
Wind of Lara Hotel & Spa	4.3	4,623

Competitive read: Both signals are above the qualified-peer median; limited cohort validity prevents a decision-grade market classification.

PASSWARNFAILUnverifiedUnavailableInformational

Where is verified KPI evidence concentrated?

Raw deterministic evidence states are compared across all six approved pillars. Bar length is a count, not maturity or a KPI score.

Focus, hover or tap a chart value for exact evidence details.

Canonical findings and evidence ownership

Verified capabilities and gaps retain their evidence scope. Source observations do not prove rendered interaction. Findings are ordered by status and control ID; commercial impact is not ranked.

Online Discoverability

Verified capability: Facebook profile linkage · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
Verified capability: Instagram profile linkage · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
Verified capability: X profile linkage · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
Verified capability: YouTube profile linkage · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
Verified capability: Entry-page indexing directives · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface — Entry-page indexing directives: pass. Reason: TYPED_PASS.
Verified capability: Publisher title quality · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
Verified gap: Publisher description quality · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
Evidence gap: LinkedIn profile linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
Evidence gap: Pinterest profile linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
Evidence gap: TikTok profile linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
Evidence gap: Declared location linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
Evidence gap: Search result language consistency · UNAVAILABLE · Platform evidence

Reputation & Trust

Verified capability: Blocklist exposure · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
Verified capability: DMARC policy · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
Verified capability: MX configuration · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
Verified capability: SPF policy · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
Verified capability: Comparable rating position · PASS · Platform evidence
Verified capability: Matched listing rating · PASS · Platform evidence
Verified capability: About identity evidence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
Verified capability: Secure connection · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
Verified capability: Site icon presence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
Evidence gap: Facebook public profile presence · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
Evidence gap: Instagram public profile presence · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
Evidence gap: LinkedIn public profile presence · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
Evidence gap: X public profile presence · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
Evidence gap: YouTube public profile presence · UNAVAILABLE · Platform evidence
Evidence gap: Cross-channel visual identity · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
Evidence gap: Facebook visual identity · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
Evidence gap: Instagram visual identity · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
Evidence gap: LinkedIn visual identity · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
Evidence gap: X visual identity · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
Evidence gap: YouTube visual identity · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
Evidence gap: Content freshness evidence · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface

Website Experience & Performance

Verified capability: Layout stability (lab) · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface — Layout stability (lab): pass. Reason: TYPED_PASS.
Verified capability: Accessibility markup basics · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
Verified capability: Responsive viewport declaration · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
Verified gap: Accessible button names · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface — Accessible button names: fail. Reason: TYPED_FAIL.
Verified gap: Accessible link names · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface — Accessible link names: fail. Reason: TYPED_FAIL.
Verified gap: Blocking responsiveness proxy (lab) · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface — Blocking responsiveness proxy (lab): fail. Reason: TYPED_FAIL.
Verified gap: Desktop lab performance · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface
Verified gap: Largest contentful paint (lab) · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface — Largest contentful paint (lab): fail. Reason: TYPED_FAIL.
Verified gap: Mobile lab performance · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface
Verified gap: Image format hygiene · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface

Measurement & Conversion Readiness

Verified capability: Tag manager declaration · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface — Tag manager declaration: pass. Reason: TYPED_PASS.
Verified capability: Contact path evidence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
Verified gap: Analytics script declaration · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface — Analytics script declaration: warn. Reason: TYPED_WARN.
Evidence gap: Directions markup actionability · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
Evidence gap: Email markup actionability · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
Evidence gap: Phone markup actionability · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
Evidence gap: Primary CTA markup · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
Evidence gap: Rendered interaction evidence · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface

Semantic & AI Readiness

Verified capability: Search result message relevance · PASS · Platform evidence
Verified capability: Brand Mentioned · PASS · Platform evidence
Verified capability: Own Domain Exposed · PASS · Platform evidence
Verified capability: Query / Page Match · PASS · Platform evidence
Verified capability: Search / Fan-out Observed · PASS · Platform evidence
Verified capability: Conversion intent alignment · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
Verified capability: Locale content coherence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
Verified capability: Primary offer clarity · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
Verified capability: Organization structured identity · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
Verified gap: Brand Recommended · FAIL · Platform evidence
Verified gap: Navigation intent alignment · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
Verified gap: Local business structured identity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
Verified gap: Breadcrumb structured data · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
Verified gap: Product or service structured identity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
Verified gap: Review structured data · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
Evidence gap: Citation-free Mention · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence

Legal & Privacy Governance

Verified capability: Benchmark legal quality · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
Verified capability: Implementation legal quality · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
Verified capability: Jurisdiction legal quality · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
Verified capability: Sector legal quality · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
Verified capability: Booking / Cancellation / Payment Terms · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
Verified capability: Cookie notice presence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
Verified gap: Freshness legal quality · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
Verified gap: Cookie & Consent · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
Verified gap: Guest Data Transparency · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
Verified gap: Hotel / Operator Legal Identity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
Verified gap: On-site Legal Discoverability & Freshness · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
Evidence gap: Guest Forms & Marketing Consent · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
Evidence gap: Privacy / Data Protection · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
Evidence gap: Rights / Privacy Contact · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
Evidence gap: Third-Party Booking / Data Sharing · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
Evidence gap: Booking & accommodation terms indexed discoverability · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
Evidence gap: Cancellation & refund indexed discoverability · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
Evidence gap: Cookie policy indexed discoverability · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
Evidence gap: Privacy & data protection indexed discoverability · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
Evidence gap: Privacy policy presence · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
Evidence gap: Terms presence · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface

How do Mobile and Desktop Lighthouse results compare?

This compares the stored Lighthouse category results by device; the four categories are not averaged into a new score.

How is Google Maps review volume distributed across matched locations?

Bar length represents review volume only; rating is shown separately in labels and details.

Percentiles withheld: a defensible branch-level peer matching unit was not established.

Accessible KPI evidence table

ALO.NET KPI Profile evidence coverage and status distribution
Pillar	Evaluated / applicable	PASS	WARN	FAIL	Unverified	Unavailable	Evidence coverage	Confidence
Online Discoverability	7 / 12	6	1	0	4	1	7 of 12 applicable controls evaluated	Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control
Reputation & Trust	9 / 21	9	0	0	11	1	9 of 21 applicable controls evaluated	Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control
Website Experience & Performance	10 / 10	3	1	6	0	0	10 of 10 applicable controls evaluated	Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control
Measurement & Conversion Readiness	3 / 8	2	1	0	5	0	3 of 8 applicable controls evaluated	Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control
Semantic & AI Readiness	15 / 16	9	5	1	1	0	15 of 16 applicable controls evaluated	Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control
Legal & Privacy Governance	11 / 21	6	5	0	10	0	11 of 21 applicable controls evaluated	Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control

Accessible PageSpeed data table

Stored PageSpeed device comparison
Device	Performance	Accessibility	Best Practices	SEO	Source collection time
Mobile	31	76	69	85	2026-10-20T12:18:16.256Z
Desktop	37	76	73	85	2026-10-20T12:18:16.574Z

Accessible Maps location data table

Matched Google Maps location evidence
Location	Reviews	Rating	Focal status
Delphin Imperial Hotel	7618	4.6	Selected focal branch
Delphin Diva Premiere	4157	4.7	Matched location

Measurement & Conversion Readiness

Evidence details ▾

WARN Analytics script declaration

Not detected from the inspected entry source; deferred or consent-dependent loading remains possible. Presence does not establish execution, events, conversions or form delivery.

PASS Tag manager declaration

Explicit declaration detected in inspected entry source. Presence does not establish execution, events, conversions or form delivery.

Indexed-source provisioning was unavailable for this audit; the rest of the report is unaffected.

Sector: HospitalityEvaluated locales: EN, TRIndexed-source readiness: source errorKPI treatment: Score withheld

Presentationunknown

Document scopeUnknown

Locale gapsNo cross-locale gap established

This control reviews indexed-search discoverability only. It does not establish that a document is current or present on the live website, and legal compliance was not verified.

Legal Check (Sectoral & Jurisdiction Legal Intelligence)

(Cached evidence · captured 20 Oct 2026 UTC; live access not rechecked)

80/100StrongLimited evidence coverage · provisional

Sector: Hospitality

Audit market: Türkiye · estimated from auditor IP ip_estimate

Score Breakdown

Jurisdiction Baseline34.7/45

Sector-Specific Transparency21.5/25

Implementation12.6/15

Benchmark MaturityProvisional · 7.8/10

Freshness & Ownership3.0/5

Top Legal Gaps

Provide discoverable cookie information and verify usable consent/preferences behavior in a rendered browser.

Sector-Critical Findings

Guest-data transparencyPARTIAL

Guest-specific privacy context in collected public evidence.

Booking / cancellation termsPASS

Reservation, cancellation, no-show, payment and fee coverage.

Loyalty / marketing controlsUNVERIFIED

Marketing or loyalty transparency signal.

Third-party booking disclosureUNVERIFIED

Booking responsibility boundary where observable.

Local operator clarityPASS

Property/group controller clarity, separate from audit market.

Benchmark summary: Comparison covers discoverability, coverage, policy layering, hospitality specialization, localization, rights mechanisms and observable implementation; it does not compare legal text similarity or certify legal equivalence.

Evidence Ledger

Evidence scope: legal completeness and applicability. A Trust Basics PASS can confirm that a public surface was detected while this card still reports WARN for incomplete content. Indexed-search availability is assessed separately and does not override either result.

Jurisdiction pack: Türkiye · applicability PARTIAL

Entity-jurisdiction signals: Türkiye-linked controller/operator signals were observed in public evidence; applicability still requires legal confirmation.

The bounded public evidence did not establish a complete legal-transparency layer with high confidence. Unverified surfaces are kept separate from confirmed gaps, and Türkiye is applied only as the market-comparison lens.

Verified Legal Topics

Privacy / Data ProtectionUNVERIFIED

No applicable evidence was evaluable; the contributing checks were unverified or not applicable.

Hotel / Operator Legal IdentityWARN

Controller / privacy ownership / contact remained incomplete in the collected evidence.

Guest Data TransparencyWARN

Guest-data transparency remained incomplete in the collected evidence.

Booking / Cancellation / Payment TermsPASS

Booking / Cancellation / Payment Terms was materially supported across the applicable collected evidence.

Rights / Privacy ContactUNVERIFIED

No applicable evidence was evaluable; the contributing checks were unverified or not applicable.

On-site Legal Discoverability & FreshnessWARN

Localized route / crawl usability and Legal information architecture / layering remained incomplete in the collected evidence.

Evaluated Legal Criteria

Legal entity / controller clarityPASS

Controller/entity language in collected public evidence.

Privacy notice core completenessUNVERIFIED

Privacy surface plus core disclosure signals.

Purpose / legal basis / rights / transfers / retentionUNVERIFIED

Observed structured disclosure families: 0 of 5.

Terms / legal notices / market surfacesUNVERIFIED

Terms surface discovery state.

Rights-exercise / privacy-contact mechanismUNVERIFIED

Rights and request/contact language in collected evidence.

Guest-data transparencyPARTIAL

Guest/hospitality data context.

Booking / cancellation / no-show / paymentPASS

Transaction and stay-condition signals.

Loyalty / marketing controlsUNVERIFIED

Loyalty or marketing transparency signal.

Third-party booking disclosureUNVERIFIED

A third-party booking boundary is scored only when observable.

Local operator / property identityPASS

Controller and jurisdiction-localization signals remain distinct from audit market.

On-site Legal DiscoverabilityPASS

Homepage and bounded-site discovery evidence.

Form-to-notice alignmentUNVERIFIED

No form is submitted; adjacent notice behavior requires dedicated evidence.

Localized route / crawl usabilityPARTIAL

Türkiye-localized discoverability signal.

Privacy request mechanism usabilityUNVERIFIED

Public request path observed; submission is not tested.

Coverage breadthPARTIAL

Coverage compared by capability, not text similarity.

Legal information architecture / layeringPARTIAL

Separate public legal surfaces.

Sector specializationPASS

Hospitality-specific transparency coverage.

Market localizationPASS

Türkiye-market localization signal.

Accessibility transparencyUNVERIFIED

Accessibility is not inferred when not observed.

Effective / updated date signalsUNVERIFIED

Effective-date language in public evidence.

Controller / privacy ownership / contactPARTIAL

Ownership and contact signals.

Internal consistency / version clarityUNVERIFIED

Consistency is not asserted without enough public evidence.

Core Legal Surfaces

Privacy NoticeUNVERIFIED

Not verifiable in collected evidence.

Cookie PolicyPASS

Public surface observed through the bounded site discovery evidence. Public source

TermsUNVERIFIED

Not verifiable in collected evidence.

Legal Entity / ControllerPASS

Controller or legal-entity language observed.

Rights / Privacy RequestUNVERIFIED

Not verifiable in collected evidence.

AccessibilityUNVERIFIED

Not verifiable in collected evidence.

Localized Legal PageUNVERIFIED

Türkiye localization signal observed.

Consent & Implementation

Cookie / consent runtime behaviorUNVERIFIED

Browser verification required.

Form-to-notice alignmentUNVERIFIED

Forms are never submitted by this audit.

Rights-request usabilityUNVERIFIED

Public route only; no personal data is generated or submitted.

Benchmark Reference Records

Barut Hotels · TRMaxx Royal · TRAccor · GLOBAL/EU_EEAHilton · GLOBAL/US/TRMarriott · GLOBAL/US

How this score is calculated: Legal Check combines applicable jurisdiction/market transparency (45%), sector-specific legal transparency (25%), observable implementation (15%), maturity against curated sector benchmarks (10%), and freshness/ownership signals (5%). The audit evaluates public website evidence for online-reputation and transparency purposes; it is not a legal opinion or certification.

Audit-market context: The market is taken from the country selected for the audit. If no country is selected, ALO.NET Audit estimates the market from the auditor’s IP connection. Market context guides localized comparison; it does not by itself determine the audited company’s governing law.

Benchmark corpus: Comparison uses a versioned, periodically reviewed benchmark and regulatory-reference corpus. Legal pages and guidance can change over time, so the result reflects the corpus version and evidence collected for this audit.

Engine legal-check-engine-v1.0.0 · Jurisdiction pack tr-legal-transparency-v1.0.0 · Corpus hospitality-benchmarks-2026-q3-v1

Skipped modules to keep the report responsive: Social Presence Signals, Logo Consistency.

Competitive Reputation Context

Sector

Hospitality

Business Model

Not classified from audited evidence

Directional benchmark: For the selected focal branch, the current Google Maps review footprint is above, with 7,618 reviews compared with a qualified-peer median of 4,623. Its 4.6 rating remains above the peer median of 4.5. This branch-level comparison does not represent the complete multi-location brand. This comparison applies only to the documented Google Maps cohort and does not classify overall online reputation. Separately observed mobile PageSpeed at 31/100 may weaken booking confidence.

Comparable peers must match sector, business model, brand scale and market context. Each reputation platform is interpreted as its own layer; Google Maps ratings are not blended with Tripadvisor, Trustpilot, OTA, social, SERP or PageSpeed signals.

Sector and business model assignment

Confidence: needs_manual_verification · Peer interpretation: not_comparable

Manual assignment is preferred when the audited brand operates in a complex category. Automatic detection is treated as detected_but_weak unless supported by machine-readable public signals.

Google Maps peer layer

Confidence: confirmed_public_signal · Peer interpretation: below_peer_median

Google Maps peer comparison is based only on comparable Google Maps places and is not mixed with Tripadvisor, Trustpilot, OTA, or other platform scores.

Mobile lead / decision experience

Confidence: detected_but_weak · Peer interpretation: not_comparable

Mobile PageSpeed is 31/100 under automated audit conditions. In this sector, mobile performance affects booking confidence and conversion intent.

Entity and structured-data clarity

Confidence: confirmed_public_signal · Peer interpretation: not_comparable

Machine-readable structured data was detected and can help search engines understand the entity, locations, people or services.

Foundational trust maturity

Confidence: needs_manual_verification · Peer interpretation: not_comparable

Trust Basics: 6/10; unresolved criteria require further verification and were not treated as failures.

Public reviews directly influence booking confidence. Weak review scores, weak OTA or Maps visibility, poor mobile speed, and unclear brand/entity signals should be read as revenue and booking-confidence risks, not only SEO issues.

Sector classification is based on bounded audited-root evidence. Each row-level observation remains separately limited by its stated crawl, provider and verification conditions.

Semantic Check

(Cached evidence · captured 20 Oct 2026 UTC; live access not rechecked)

This marketing-oriented comparison examines whether homepage promise, navigation intent and conversion actions remain semantically coherent across the public website evidence collected for this audit.

Evaluated findings may contribute to Verified Checks, which is separate from the future 100-point KPI score. A Not verifiable Navigation-to-Landing Alignment is a WARN coverage state, never a failure; other unavailable, unverified and informational evidence is excluded.

Primary Offer Clarity

Clear

The homepage primary promise names a concrete offer and supporting copy reinforces the same commercial meaning.

Delphin Hotels & Resorts — https://www.delphinhotel.com/
Delphin Hotels and Resorts offer a holiday beyond dreams in Antalya, Lara, Kundu, Okurcalar and Alanya regions with well known beaches, waterslide pools, children's playgrounds and restaurants offering exquisite tastes. — https://www.delphinhotel.com/

Navigation Destination Alignment

Not verifiable

Destination verification unavailable: Navigation destinations could not be compared from the bounded evidence set.

Book Now — https://imperial.delphinhotel.com/
Call Me Back — https://www.delphinhotel.com/home/callbackform

CTA-to-Destination Alignment

Aligned

The evaluated CTA actions align with their observable native action or destination purpose.

Book Now — https://imperial.delphinhotel.com/
+90 242 320 07 07 — tel:+902423200707
Contact — https://www.delphinhotel.com/contact-page

Locale-to-Content Coherence

Coherent

The evaluated first-party footer prose is coherent with the explicitly declared page locale.

Subscribe Get Discount Members Get More Delphin Members spend smarter and benefit more. Join our community and enjoy exclusive privileges. Login for benefit Benefits of Membership LOGIN Don't have an account yet? Sign Up Delphin Imperial Hotel Lara, Kemerağzı Mahallesi Yaşar Sobutay Bulvarı No:344 AKSU/ANTALYA/TÜRKİYE — https://www.delphinhotel.com/

Live SERP Description Marketing Relevance

Marketing-relevant

The live brand-search description provides substantive non-legal copy that can introduce the brand or page offer.

Unser Hotel befindet sich zwischen dem Palmenstrand und bunten Blumen. Der Flughafen von Antalya ist 90 km und die Orte Alanya und Side sind 32 km entfernt. — https://www.delphinhotel.com/de/delphin-deluxe

Evidence scope: 34 internal candidates discovered; 2 bounded destination pages fetched.

Frontend Interaction Check

This interaction-oriented review examines whether public contact details and conversion controls expose usable native actions in the collected website evidence.

Source markup does not by itself prove visual clickability. A Not observed contact or CTA input is a FAIL only after accessible bounded source evidence was evaluated; browser-required, restricted and unverified observations are excluded from Verified Checks and canonical KPI scoring.

Phone Actionability

Actionable in markup

The observed phone value has a matching native action in source markup.

Email Actionability

Actionable in markup

The observed email value has a matching native action in source markup.

Address-to-Directions Actionability

Directions linked

The observed address is linked to a map or directions destination in source markup.

CTA (Call-To-Action) Markup Actionability

Native action

At least one primary CTA exposes a native destination or form action in source markup.

Rendered Interaction Evidence

Browser verification required

Not verifiable: Source markup cannot prove visual affordance, pointer hit testing, overlay interference, focus visibility or runtime activation.

Collected: 2026-10-20T12:18:43+00:00

Logo Consistency Check

Your Website Logo

www.delphinhotel.com

Your Website Favicon

PASS — A favicon URL was detected on the audited website. Social-logo consistency is assessed separately.

No completed social-profile logo comparisons were retained. Visual consistency is unverified.

Your Website Favicon

PASS — A favicon was detected in the audited website markup. Its image was not retained for visual comparison.

Retained favicon detection

Favicon / Site Icon

Favicon or site icon detected — reinforces brand identity in browser tabs and bookmarks.

Why it matters: A favicon strengthens brand recognition in the browser tab and bookmarks; its absence signals incomplete website setup to visitors.

Trust Basic Web Scraping

6/10

Trust Basics

(Cached evidence · captured 20 Oct 2026 UTC; live access not rechecked)

Evidence scope: audited-site observation. A green dot means the signal was detected from the audited entry point or bounded first-party evidence. It does not mean the same information was available to the indexed-search provider or that its legal completeness was verified.

Insufficient evidence for a Trust Score. The badge reports detected ten-item Trust Basics; unresolved criteria remain neutral and are not counted as failures.

About Page

About page detected (https://delphinhotel.com/corporate-company-information) — provides a corporate trust signal to visitors.

Why it matters: Visitors and search engines use the About page to verify the legitimacy of a business; its absence reduces trust and conversion.

Contact Page

Detected (https://delphinhotel.com/contact-page) through bounded shared first-party evidence.

Why it matters: A reachable business is a trustworthy business; Google also uses contact signals as a local relevance and E-E-A-T factor (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness).

Insufficient source evidence — this criterion could not be verified from the bounded first-party evidence collected during the audit.

Why it matters: This Trust Basics control observes audited-site presence only. Google-indexed visibility and legal completeness are reported separately.

Insufficient source evidence — this criterion could not be verified from the bounded first-party evidence collected during the audit.

Why it matters: This Trust Basics control checks generic site-terms presence only; transaction-specific terms and indexed-search discoverability are separate checks.

Mobile Responsive Design

Viewport meta tag present — site appears to meet mobile-responsive standards.

Why it matters: Over 60% of web traffic is mobile; Google uses mobile-first indexing, so non-responsive sites rank lower and lose visitors.

Image Format Quality

Only 0% of images use modern formats; replacing large JPG/PNG files with WebP/AVIF and using SVG for the logo is recommended. WebP: 0 · AVIF: 0 · JPG/JPEG: 20 · PNG: 19 · Logo SVG not found

Why it matters: Modern image formats reduce page weight by 25–50% and maybe even more.

Constant Acceptance — Accessibility (a11y)

Accessibility signals detected. ARIA attributes: 11 · Lang attribute: present · Image alt coverage: 85%

Why it matters: Accessible sites reach 15% more users (including those with disabilities), avoid legal risk (ADA/EAA), and earn better Core Web Vitals signals from Google.

HTTPS / Secure Connection

Website is served over HTTPS — encrypted connection protects visitors and earns the browser padlock.

Why it matters: HTTPS is a confirmed Google ranking factor; browsers display security warnings on HTTP sites, causing visitors to abandon immediately.

Multilingual Site

This site is available in 4 languages: Turkish and English and German and and Russian. Serving content in multiple languages broadens audience reach and improves international SEO.

Why it matters: Multilingual sites can capture search traffic across language markets; ensure each language version has its own hreflang tag, sitemap entry, and properly localised metadata for maximum visibility.

Automated Client Reachability

A standard GET request and a lightweight automated HEAD probe both succeeded — no automated-client compatibility issue was detected.

Why it matters: Some legacy servers or WAFs block non-browser HTTP methods or automated user agents while still serving real visitors and search engines normally; this is verified sub-evidence for the HTTPS/Secure Connection control, not a separate scored control.

Content Freshness

Unavailable — no evaluated finding was retained in this report.

Schema.org Basic Check

(Cached evidence · captured 20 Oct 2026 UTC; live access not rechecked)

Organization Schema

Organization schema or a valid subtype was detected — business identity is communicated to search engines.

Why it matters: Organization structured data helps search engines understand the entity. Detection does not guarantee a Knowledge Panel or a particular branded-search presentation.

LocalBusiness Schema

LocalBusiness schema not found — important for local SEO for any business with a physical location.

Why it matters: LocalBusiness schema enables Google Maps rich results and improves visibility in "near me" searches.

Product / Service Schema

Product/Service schema not found — sites offering services or products are missing rich snippet opportunities.

Why it matters: Product schema enables price, availability, and review stars in SERP, increasing click-through rates significantly.

Review / AggregateRating Schema

Review schema not found — sites with customer reviews have an opportunity to show star snippets in search results.

Why it matters: Star ratings in SERP increase click-through rates by up to 35% compared to plain listings.

Detected schema types: Corporation, ContactPoint

Google SERP Preview

Title / description language consistency

Google SERP stands for Google Search Engine Results Page — the page of results shown when someone searches online for a brand, product, person, service, or related topic. It is often the very first impression a potential customer, partner, or journalist has of the searched entity. Optimizing these elements is frequently one of the highest-return SEO actions available, because it can influence click-through rate before the visitor ever lands on the website.

Source: captured Google organic results for the recorded query. The primary preview requires a URL matching the audited entry or its root locale; other domain pages are disclosed separately.

Exact query: Delphin Hotels & Resorts
Location: Turkey
Country (gl): tr
Language (hl): tr
Device: desktop
Collected at: 2026-10-20 15:18 (UTC user time)
search_metadata.id: 6ad75c16fd9b903dc082264a
Returned Google URL: https://www.google.com/search?q=Delphin%20Hotels%20&oq=Delphin%20Hotels%20&uule=w%20CAIQICIGVHVya2V5&hl=tr&gl=tr&safe=active&filter=1&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

No audited-entry result was captured in this query. The other domain page below is not the brand homepage preview.

Audited publisher metadata · not captured Google result copy

https://www.delphinhotel.com

Captured text is unavailable in the report language. Original evidence is retained.

Other captured domain page · not the audited entry

www.delphinhotel.com/de/delphin-deluxe

Delphin Deluxe

Unser Hotel befindet sich zwischen dem Palmenstrand und bunten Blumen. Der Flughafen von Antalya ist 90 km und die Orte Alanya und Side sind 32 km entfernt.

Site Title

Title tag present and well-sized. Length: 31 characters — within the ideal length range.

Why it matters: The title tag is the single most visible element in SERP; getting length and keyword placement right is the easiest SEO win.

Meta Description

Meta description present but needs optimisation. Length: 219 characters — long, may be truncated in SERP (ideal: 120–160 characters). Google may generate a snippet from page content when the meta description is too short — write a specific 120–160 character description to take control of how the brand appears in search results.

Why it matters: A well-written meta description acts as ad copy in SERP; it directly influences click-through rate even though it is not a direct ranking factor.

Structured Data Detected

Publisher JSON-LD detected: Corporation, ContactPoint. This is machine-readable entity evidence; it does not prove that Google currently displays a rich result.

Why it matters: Structured data helps search engines understand entities and page content. Rich-result eligibility and actual Google presentation are separate and query-dependent.

AI Search Readiness

(Cached evidence · captured 20 Oct 2026 UTC; live access not rechecked)

Captured query and answer text is translated for display. Original provider text remains in the saved evidence.

Six query-scoped observations distinguish page matching, search-assisted answers, source exposure, brand mentions and recommendations. These observations describe the captured query and response, not general AI visibility or ranking. Unverified observations are excluded from Check Score.

Measured observations: 5/6 · Unverified: 1/6. Check Score uses the evaluated observations.

Captured text is unavailable in the report language. Original evidence is retained.

Query / Page Match PASS

BRANDED AI QUERY FETCHED PUBLISHER SOURCE

Captured text is unavailable in the report language. Original evidence is retained.

https://www.delphinhotel.com/

Search / Fan-out Observed PASS

SEARCH ASSISTED AI ANSWER CAPTURED

Captured text is unavailable in the report language. Original evidence is retained.

Own Domain Exposed PASS

OWN DOMAIN IN AI REFERENCES

Captured text is unavailable in the report language. Original evidence is retained.

Brand Mentioned PASS

EXACT BRAND IN AI ANSWER

Captured text is unavailable in the report language. Original evidence is retained.

Brand Recommended FAIL

NO SUPPORTED EXPLICIT RECOMMENDATION

Captured text is unavailable in the report language. Original evidence is retained.

Citation-free Mention UNVERIFIED

No complete, scope-matched observation was captured for this measurement.

Captured answer and citations

Partial captured mapping; unresolved sources remain unverified. Links show provider attachments to answer blocks; source support for every claim is not independently verified.

Captured text is unavailable in the report language. Original evidence is retained.

https://www.delphinhotel.com/

Source destination not resolved.

Captured text is unavailable in the report language. Original evidence is retained.

https://www.delphinhotel.com/

Captured text is unavailable in the report language. Original evidence is retained.

Source destination not resolved.

Captured text is unavailable in the report language. Original evidence is retained.

https://www.delphinhotel.com/tr/delphin-imperial

Captured text is unavailable in the report language. Original evidence is retained.

https://www.delphinhotel.com/tr/delphin-be-grand-resort

Captured text is unavailable in the report language. Original evidence is retained.

https://www.delphinhotel.com/

https://www.delphinhotel.com/home

Source destination not resolved.

Captured text is unavailable in the report language. Original evidence is retained.

https://www.delphinhotel.com/tr/botanik-platinum

Captured text is unavailable in the report language. Original evidence is retained.

https://www.delphinhotel.com/

https://www.delphinhotel.com/home

Source destination not resolved.

Captured text is unavailable in the report language. Original evidence is retained.

Supporting technical observations

About: PASS · Contact: PASS · Schema types: Corporation, ContactPoint. Technical presence supports interpretation; it does not prove an AI answer, recommendation, citation or indexing.

DNS & Email Trust

delphinhotel.com · First seen on the internet: February 2, 2001

Email Blacklist Status

Clean — not listed on any of 10 primary blacklists checked.

Source: MXToolbox SuperTool ↗

Why it matters: If your domain appears on an email blacklist, your outbound emails (newsletters, booking confirmations, order receipts) land in spam. This directly damages customer communication and revenue.

DMARC Policy

Configured (p=reject): Reject — strongest protection; spoofed emails are blocked.

v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:postmaster@delphinhotel.com!10m; ruf=mailto:postmaster@delphinhotel.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct

Why it matters: DMARC prevents email spoofing and phishing in your name. Without it, anyone can send emails pretending to be your domain — damaging brand reputation and customer trust.

SPF Record

SPF policy validated: syntax, a single policy and the DNS lookup budget passed. This does not prove authentication of a particular email.

v=spf1 ip4:95.0.104.205 a:mail.delphinhotel.com include:mta.tawk.to include:delphin-hotels.p.tawk.email include:_spf_useast2.prod.hydra.sophos.com include:servers.mcsv.net -all

Source: MXToolbox · delphinhotel.com · 2026-10-20T12:18:41Z

MX Configuration

Valid non-null MX routing records were detected for this domain. Server reachability and inbox delivery were not tested.

1 mx-01-us-east-2.prod.hydra.sophos.com

2 mx-02-us-east-2.prod.hydra.sophos.com

100 mail.delphinhotel.com

Source: MXToolbox · delphinhotel.com · 2026-10-20T12:18:43Z

Online Reputation Audit

| Executive Summary

Checks Passed

Executive Scoreboard

Executive Strength / Risk

90 days Priorities

90-Day Priority Actions

Google PageSpeed/SEO — www.delphinhotel.com

Google Maps Reviews

Competitive Google Maps Rating vs Comparable Peers

Competitive Google Maps Review Volume vs Comparable Peers

Competitive Reputation Position

ALO.NET KPI Profile

Where is verified KPI evidence concentrated?

Online Discoverability

Reputation & Trust

Website Experience & Performance

Measurement & Conversion Readiness

Semantic & AI Readiness

Legal & Privacy Governance

How do Mobile and Desktop Lighthouse results compare?

How is Google Maps review volume distributed across matched locations?

Measurement & Conversion Readiness

Google-Indexed Legal Discoverability

Legal Check (Sectoral & Jurisdiction Legal Intelligence)

Score Breakdown

Top Legal Gaps

Sector-Critical Findings

Verified Legal Topics

Evaluated Legal Criteria

Core Legal Surfaces

Consent & Implementation

Benchmark Reference Records

Competitive Reputation Context

Semantic Check

Frontend Interaction Check

Social Presence Signals

Logo Consistency Check

Trust Basic Web Scraping

Schema.org Basic Check

Google SERP Preview

Social Links On Site

AI Search Readiness

DNS & Email Trust

News

Project Introduction

client

tags

date

Executive Summary