See historic audits
Approved audits, including the current report. Hover or focus a point for values; select it to open the report.
Online Reputation
Executive Summary
Checks Passed
56 checks were evaluated within the available access and audit scope. 37 are PASS; 17 are WARN and 2 are FAIL. These counts show the results of evaluated checks, not a weighted quality score.
Executive Scoreboard
Executive Strength / Risk
This audit provides a consolidated executive view of how a brand’s digital presence supports—or weakens—its online reputation and the value of its digital investments. It evaluates key public indicators across semantic visibility, technical performance, legal and trust signals, platform consistency, reputation strength, and sector-specific competitive context. Rather than treating these signals in isolation, the audit examines their relationships and relevant correlations with commercial performance. Its final goal is to give senior executives a clear, evidence-based basis for identifying gaps, challenging internal assumptions, prioritizing corrective action, and making better-informed digital investment decisions.
Audit Report Definitions
Check Score
Audited online-presence quality indicator: PASS / (PASS + WARN + FAIL) × 100. Unverified and unavailable checks are excluded. This is not an overall brand or revenue score.
Verified Checks
Shows the checks ALO.NET Audit could evaluate using concrete evidence in this report. For example, 20/37 Verified Checks means that 20 of the 37 evaluated checks received PASS; the remainder may be WARN or FAIL. Unavailable, Unverified and excluded checks are outside this total.
Trust Basics
Summarizes basic website trust signals, including organizational identity, contact information, essential policies and trust infrastructure that help visitors and digital systems assess a website. It indicates basic trust hygiene and is neither a legal compliance certificate nor an overall reputation score.
Evidence Captured
Shows how many applicable checks have enough evidence for evaluation. For example, 48/83 means that usable evidence was obtained for 48 of 83 applicable checks. A higher value indicates broader audit coverage; it does not mean that the website performed well.
First Seen On Internet
Shows an estimated date from which the domain can be observed online. This is not the company incorporation date, the age of the brand or the opening date of a physical business. It provides context about the domain’s observable online history.
Matched Listings Avg. Rating
Shows the average user rating of Google Maps business listings reliably matched to the audited brand or website. Only verified entity matches are included; unrelated businesses with the same or a similar name are excluded. A qualified entity match does not necessarily mean that the listing’s Website field matches the audited domain.
Reviews Across Matched Listings
Shows the total number of user reviews across business listings matched to the brand. It indicates the volume of user feedback and provides context about online visibility. Review volume alone does not establish whether feedback is positive or negative.
Mobile PageSpeed
Shows website performance on mobile devices as a 0–100 score measured using Google Lighthouse/PageSpeed methodology. A higher score generally indicates better loading performance and user experience. This technical performance measure is produced by Google and is independent of the ALO.NET Check Score.
Executive Scoreboard
Provides an at-a-glance executive overview of key audit areas. Each row represents a different area and shows its PASS, WARN and FAIL results or the relevant system’s native score. Rows may use different measurement types, so their values should not always be compared directly as equivalent scores.
Legal Check
Examines whether essential legal and privacy information is accessible to users and search systems, together with related requirements that can be evaluated within the audit scope. ALO.NET Audit does not provide legal advice, and this result is not a legal compliance certificate.
AI Search Readiness
Separates captured query/page matching, search-assisted answers, own-domain sources, brand mentions, explicit recommendations and citation-free mentions. Results apply to the recorded query, market and response; unavailable observations remain neutral. Technical presence does not guarantee AI visibility or ranking.
Frontend Interaction Check
Examines visible interface and link signals that help visitors reach core actions such as contacting the business, searching, getting directions or making a reservation. Detecting a button or link does not establish that the corresponding action was successfully completed from end to end.
Semantic Quality
Evaluates structural and semantic signals that help people and machines understand page content. Headings, content relationships and related semantic cues help clarify what a page communicates.
PageSpeed | SEO Technical Quality
Summarizes measurable indicators of website performance and technical search readiness. Native PageSpeed/Lighthouse scores are provider measurements, rather than scores recreated by ALO.NET. They indicate technical quality but do not independently predict Google rankings.
Maps & Review Metrics
Evaluates verifiable Google Maps business listings, user ratings, review volume and, when available, comparable market evidence. Its purpose is to show the measurable portion of the brand’s local digital reputation within the audited scope.
Structured Data
Checks for structured data defined in website source code using standards such as Schema.org. This data can help search engines understand organizations, businesses, products, services and other content more accurately.
Social Presence
Evaluates the online presence of social media profiles verified as belonging to the brand. The result reflects verifiable brand presence, rather than follower counts or social media success.
Search Presence
Evaluates verifiable signals about whether the brand and website can be found by search systems. It shows available search visibility evidence and does not guarantee a ranking for any particular keyword.
Social Links
Checks links from the website’s own pages to the brand’s social media profiles. These links help establish an explicit first-party relationship between the website and the social accounts.
PASS / WARN / FAIL
PASS means sufficient positive evidence was found for the evaluated condition. WARN means the result is partly positive but needs attention. FAIL means an evaluated check did not meet the expected condition. These statuses apply only to checks that could actually be evaluated.
Doruk Sağlık Grubu is a healthcare provider offering medical care, treatment and patient services. Its website highlights 1-31 EKİM: MEME KANSERİ FARKINDALIK AYI and DA VİNCİ ROBOTİK CERRAHİ. The website links to Instagram, Facebook and YouTube profiles. The captured AI answer mentions the brand in response to the audited query. Further service details and geographic coverage are not added where the collected profile does not substantiate them.
Verified Evidence Positioning Map (Comparable Brands)Comparison scope: Healthcare saved audits. Compatible saved ALO.NET Audit reports only; separate from Google Maps Comparable Peers.Youmemorial.com.tracibadem.com.trdorukhospital.comjimer.com.trsanteplusgroup.com
X: Verified Checks, 0-100 (this audit's eligible-control scale is planned to expand toward 100). Y: verified passes across 17 shared evaluated controls, shown as a count, not a percent. Marker size scales with Verified Checks; legend order and color are identity-only, not a leaderboard.Brand Verified Checks Shared passes You 37/56 12/17 memorial.com.tr 38/68 7/17 acibadem.com.tr 36/67 8/17 dorukhospital.com 22/47 7/17 jimer.com.tr 25/53 5/17 santeplusgroup.com 12/31 8/17
Observed weakness: Search-to-care journey clarity is the selected weakness. The audited entry point did not present consistently decision-ready publisher search copy. This is high-confidence decision-journey evidence for the search-to-care journey; it does not establish the live Google result, patients' response, conversion or revenue. see details ↓
Observed strength: Machine-readable business clarity is the selected strength. Structured entity data was detected. This is high-confidence search and entity evidence. It does not verify search eligibility, visibility or customer response. No material strength cleared the evidence and materiality threshold in this audit. see details ↓
Management Decision: Management should assign a named owner and review date to search-to-care journey clarity, then use a relevant first-party journey indicator to test whether the exposure is reduced. It should preserve machine-readable business clarity as a managed public strength while keeping the conclusion within the cited confidence, cohort and measurement limits. The review should test whether patients can move from discovery to appointment action without ambiguity, separating observed change from assumed commercial impact. see details ↓
Supporting Market Evidence: A qualified Google Maps location count was not available from this audit scope. see details ↓
search-to-care journey clarity: Observed evidence: Publisher-controlled search messaging is not consistently decision-ready. Why management should care: The first search interaction may not communicate service relevance or the appointment next step clearly enough for patients. What could go wrong: Patients may reach the site without a clear service or appointment route, weakening access actionability. see details ↓
machine-readable business clarity: Observed evidence: Structured entity data was detected. Management value: Search platforms may receive an incomplete relationship between the provider, locations, services and clinicians. The public signal should be protected, but it is not proof of a commercial outcome. see details ↓
customer-facing governance: Observed evidence: Legal Check evaluated Patient privacy / local equivalent and sensitive health data was incomplete and Legal entity / controller clarity was incomplete. Why management should care: Management may be less able to reconstruct the relevant patient-facing disclosure and the responsible-entity statement presented at the appointment or patient-data decision point. see details ↓
Audit Scope: Audit market: Türkiye. The market was estimated from the auditor's IP connection at submission. Google SERP and Google Maps evidence is limited to this market, including for global brands; the audit does not automatically classify the entity as global or regional. see details ↓
90 days Priorities
- What proposition and next step should a patient see at the search decision point, and who owns its consistency? see details ↓
- What evidence will demonstrate that the selected corrective action changed the measured outcome? see details ↓
- Do Brand, Digital and Operations agree on the canonical entity, location and offer relationships that public platforms should understand? see details ↓
90-Day Priority Actions
- Improve the measured publisher-controlled search metadata, then recheck.Measured evidence supports a bounded remediation; ranking uses the recorded score gap, relevance weight, confidence and actionability.
- Review and correct the measured policy-disclosure weakness.Measured evidence supports a bounded remediation; ranking uses the recorded score gap, relevance weight, confidence and actionability.
- Investigate and remediate measured page-performance friction, then remeasure.Measured evidence supports a bounded remediation; ranking uses the recorded score gap, relevance weight, confidence and actionability.
Google PageSpeed/SEO — doruktip.com
Page speed shapes first impressions before a single word is read. A low Performance score — especially on mobile — means visitors leave before engaging. Google uses Core Web Vitals as a ranking signal, so poor speed hurts discoverability. The SEO score here reflects technical crawlability only, not full SEO strength. Accessibility measures inclusivity. Best Practices flags security and standards compliance. Together, these reveal how seriously the digital asset is maintained.
Evidence details ▾
Mobile: WARN (3684 ms); Desktop: PASS (1267 ms). Lighthouse lab measurement of the tested entry; not field Core Web Vitals.
Mobile: PASS (0.029561872273716 unitless); Desktop: PASS (0.031710781078994 unitless). Lighthouse lab measurement of the tested entry; not field Core Web Vitals.
Mobile: PASS (0 ms); Desktop: PASS (0 ms). Lab main-thread blocking proxy; not field INP or verified real-user responsiveness.
Mobile: PASS; Desktop: PASS. Automated tested-page markup finding; not whole-site accessibility or WCAG compliance.
Mobile: NOT_APPLICABLE; Desktop: PASS. Automated tested-page markup finding; not whole-site accessibility or WCAG compliance.
Mobile: PASS; Desktop: PASS. Tested entry indexing directives only; no proof of search inclusion, robots access or whole-site crawlability. Intentional noindex needs publisher review.
Maps/Nearby presentation refreshed from this audit's retained evidence on 2026-10-13T19:22:39+00:00. Original audit date, findings and scores are unchanged.
Google Maps Reviews
Retained Maps records do not establish the required audited-domain identity and available metrics. Updated Maps ratings and Nearby qualification are withheld.
Competitive Google Maps Rating vs Comparable Peers
UnavailableA qualifying comparable-peer cohort was not available from the bounded Google Maps benchmark, so no peer position is shown.
Competitive Google Maps Review Volume vs Comparable Peers
UnavailableA qualifying comparable-peer cohort was not available from the bounded Google Maps benchmark, so no peer position is shown.
Competitive Reputation Position
UnavailableA qualifying comparable-peer cohort was not available from the bounded Google Maps benchmark, so no peer position is shown.
ALO.NET KPI Profile
Six-pillar evidence coverage and status distribution. Verified Checks remains separate and no KPI maturity score is inferred.
Where is verified KPI evidence concentrated?
Raw deterministic evidence states are compared across all six approved pillars. Bar length is a count, not maturity or a KPI score.
Canonical findings and evidence ownership
Verified capabilities and gaps retain their evidence scope. Source observations do not prove rendered interaction. Findings are ordered by status and control ID; commercial impact is not ranked.
Online Discoverability
- Verified capability: Facebook profile linkage · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Instagram profile linkage · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: X profile linkage · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: YouTube profile linkage · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Entry-page indexing directives · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface — Mobile: PASS; Desktop: PASS. Tested entry indexing directives only; no proof of search inclusion, robots access or whole-site crawlability. Intentional noindex needs publisher review.
- Verified gap: Publisher description quality · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Publisher title quality · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: LinkedIn profile linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Pinterest profile linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: TikTok profile linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Declared location linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: Search result language consistency · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
Reputation & Trust
- Verified capability: About identity evidence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Secure connection · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Site icon presence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Blocklist exposure · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: DMARC policy · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: SPF policy · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Facebook public profile presence · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: Instagram public profile presence · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: LinkedIn public profile presence · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: X public profile presence · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: YouTube public profile presence · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: Cross-channel visual identity · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Facebook visual identity · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Instagram visual identity · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: LinkedIn visual identity · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: X visual identity · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: YouTube visual identity · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Comparable rating position · UNAVAILABLE · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: Matched listing rating · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: Content freshness evidence · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
Website Experience & Performance
- Verified capability: Accessible button names · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface — Mobile: PASS; Desktop: PASS. Automated tested-page markup finding; not whole-site accessibility or WCAG compliance.
- Verified capability: Form input labels · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface — Mobile: NOT_APPLICABLE; Desktop: PASS. Automated tested-page markup finding; not whole-site accessibility or WCAG compliance.
- Verified capability: Accessible link names · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface — Mobile: PASS; Desktop: PASS. Automated tested-page markup finding; not whole-site accessibility or WCAG compliance.
- Verified capability: Blocking responsiveness proxy (lab) · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface — Mobile: PASS (0 ms); Desktop: PASS (0 ms). Lab main-thread blocking proxy; not field INP or verified real-user responsiveness.
- Verified capability: Layout stability (lab) · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface — Mobile: PASS (0.029561872273716 unitless); Desktop: PASS (0.031710781078994 unitless). Lighthouse lab measurement of the tested entry; not field Core Web Vitals.
- Verified capability: Desktop lab performance · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Mobile lab performance · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Accessibility markup basics · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Image format hygiene · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Responsive viewport declaration · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Largest contentful paint (lab) · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface — Mobile: WARN (3684 ms); Desktop: PASS (1267 ms). Lighthouse lab measurement of the tested entry; not field Core Web Vitals.
Measurement & Conversion Readiness
- Verified capability: Contact path evidence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Directions markup actionability · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Analytics script declaration · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface — Not detected from the inspected entry source; deferred or consent-dependent loading remains possible. Presence does not establish execution, events, conversions or form delivery.
- Verified gap: Tag manager declaration · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface — Not detected from the inspected entry source; deferred or consent-dependent loading remains possible. Presence does not establish execution, events, conversions or form delivery.
- Evidence gap: Rendered interaction evidence · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Source observation: Email markup actionability · INFORMATIONAL · Publisher-controlled surface — The observed email value has a matching native action in source markup.
- Source observation: Phone markup actionability · INFORMATIONAL · Publisher-controlled surface — The observed phone value has a matching native action in source markup.
- Source observation: Primary CTA markup · INFORMATIONAL · Publisher-controlled surface — At least one primary CTA exposes a native destination or form action in source markup.
Semantic & AI Readiness
- Verified capability: Brand Mentioned · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: Citation-free Mention · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: Own Domain Exposed · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: Query / Page Match · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: Search / Fan-out Observed · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: Conversion intent alignment · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Locale content coherence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Primary offer clarity · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Breadcrumb structured data · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Organization structured identity · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Navigation intent alignment · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Local business structured identity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Product or service structured identity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Review structured data · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Search result message relevance · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: Brand Recommended · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
Legal & Privacy Governance
- Verified capability: Implementation legal quality · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Cookie policy indexed discoverability · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: Patient rights indexed discoverability · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: Privacy & data protection indexed discoverability · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: Cookie notice presence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Privacy policy presence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Appointment cancellation indexed discoverability · FAIL · Platform evidence
- Verified gap: Benchmark legal quality · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Jurisdiction legal quality · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Sector legal quality · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Cookie & Consent · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Healthcare Entity / Controller Identity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: On-site Legal Discoverability & Freshness · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Patient Privacy & Sensitive Health Data · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Privacy / Data Protection · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Freshness legal quality · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Accessibility / Patient-Facing Transparency · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Appointment & Medical Form Transparency · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Patient Rights / Complaints · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Terms presence · UNAVAILABLE · Publisher-controlled surface
How do Mobile and Desktop Lighthouse results compare?
This compares the stored Lighthouse category results by device; the four categories are not averaged into a new score.
Accessible KPI evidence table
| Pillar | Evaluated / applicable | PASS | WARN | FAIL | Unverified | Unavailable | Evidence coverage | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Online Discoverability | 7 / 12 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 7 of 12 applicable controls evaluated | Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control |
| Reputation & Trust | 3 / 20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 1 | 3 of 20 applicable controls evaluated | Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control |
| Website Experience & Performance | 11 / 11 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 of 11 applicable controls evaluated | Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control |
| Measurement & Conversion Readiness | 4 / 8 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 of 8 applicable controls evaluated | Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control |
| Semantic & AI Readiness | 14 / 16 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 14 of 16 applicable controls evaluated | Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control |
| Legal & Privacy Governance | 15 / 20 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 15 of 20 applicable controls evaluated | Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control |
Accessible PageSpeed data table
| Device | Performance | Accessibility | Best Practices | SEO | Source collection time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 84 | 93 | 100 | 100 | 2026-10-08T21:38:09.778Z |
| Desktop | 96 | 94 | 100 | 100 | 2026-10-08T21:38:09.838Z |
Measurement & Conversion Readiness
Evidence details ▾
Not detected from the inspected entry source; deferred or consent-dependent loading remains possible. Presence does not establish execution, events, conversions or form delivery.
Not detected from the inspected entry source; deferred or consent-dependent loading remains possible. Presence does not establish execution, events, conversions or form delivery.
Google-Indexed Legal Discoverability
Indexed-search discoverability only. This is separate from audited-site presence in Trust Basics and content completeness in Legal Check.
Indexed-search coverage: 4 of 4 concept-locale checks were evaluated; 3 were clearly discoverable, 0 were weak or ambiguous, 1 were not detected, and 0 were unavailable. An unavailable indexed-search check is not evidence that the policy is absent from the live website.
Strongest indexed evidenceGizlilik ve Kullanım Politikaları - Doruk Sağlık Grubu
Indexed evidence URLs, titles and snippets
- Gizlilik ve Kullanım Politikaları - Doruk Sağlık Grubu
Doruk Sağlık Grubu gizlilik politikası ve kişisel verilerin korunmasına ilişkin esaslar.
- Kişisel Verilerin Korunması (KVKK) - Doruk Sağlık Grubu
Kişisel Verilerin Korunması. Doruk Sağlık Grubu olarak kişisel verilerinizin güvenliğine büyük önem veriyoruz. KVKK kapsamındaki haklarınızı ve veri işleme ...
- Çerez Politikası - Doruk Sağlık Grubu
... Kişisel Verilerin Korunması Kanunu (“Kanun”) m.10 uyarınca bilgi vermek için hazırlanmıştır. Zorunlu çerezler dışındaki hiçbir çerez, sitenin altındaki ...
- 26 Ekim Dünya Hasta Hakları Günü - Doruk Hastaneleri
26 Ekim Dünya Hasta Hakları Günü'nde Doruk Sağlık Grubu olarak, Özel Doruk Setbaşı Tıp Merkezi'nde hastalarımızla bu özel günü paylaşırken, daha iyi sağlık.
- hasta bilgilendirme rehberi - Doruk Hastaneleri
Jul 23, 2025 ... ... Hasta Hakları Birim Sorumlusu tarafından çözülür. Eğer yerinde çözülemeyecek bir sorun ise Hasta Hakları Birim Sorumlusu tarafından Hasta ...
- Ayaktan Hasta Memnuniyet Anketi - Doruk Hastaneleri
7. Önerileriniz (isteğe bağlı). 0 / 185 karakter. KVKK Aydınlatma Metni'ni okudum ve anket yanıtlarımın hizmet kalitesini ölçmek amacıyla ...
- Op. Dr. NEŞE GÜNEY — Çocuk Cerrahi Uzmanı | Doruk Hastaneleri
KİŞİSEL VERİLERİN KORUNMASI | ÇEREZ POLİTİKASI | ÇEREZ TERCİHLERİ | GİZLİLİK VE KULLANIM POLİTİKALARI. Bu sitenin içeriğinin ve görsellerinin tüm hakları ...
- Ziyaretçi ve Refakat Kuralları - Doruk Hastaneleri
İstek ve önerileriniz için Hasta Hakları Birimi ile irtibata geçebilirsiniz. Doruk Hastaneleri. Ekim · Meme Kanseri Farkındalık Ayı. Erken Teşhis Hayat ...
- 2024 YILI - Doruk Sağlık Grubu
Dec 30, 2023 ... Kişisel verilerin korunması. Bilgi Yönetim Sisteminin etkin kullanılması. Bilgi Gizliliği Güvenliği ve Bütünlüğü Talimatı. Hasta Hakları.
- İletişim | Doruk Hastaneleri
KVKK Aydınlatma Metni'ni okudum. Mesajımda paylaşabileceğim sağlık bilgileri dahil kişisel verilerimin, talebimin yanıtlanması amacıyla işlenmesine ve Doruk ...
- Merkezlerimiz ve Hizmetlerimiz - Doruk Hastaneleri
KİŞİSEL VERİLERİN KORUNMASI | ÇEREZ POLİTİKASI | ÇEREZ TERCİHLERİ | GİZLİLİK VE KULLANIM POLİTİKALARI. Bu sitenin içeriğinin ve görsellerinin tüm hakları ...
- Hasta ve Refakatçi Rehberi - Doruk Hastaneleri
İstek ve önerileriniz için Hasta Hakları Birimi ile irtibata geçebilirsiniz. Olanaklar. Hastane olanakları. Doruk Özel Nilüfer Hastanesi. Nilüfer Hastanemizde ...
- Sağlıkta Kalite Standartları - Doruk Hastaneleri
... kişisel verilerin korunması, kullanıcı hataları gibi konularda risk analizi yapılmalıdır. DBY03.02. Tespit edilen riskler doğrultusunda iyileştirme ...
- İnsan Kaynakları - Doruk Hastaneleri
CV / Özgeçmişinizi Sürükleyin. Veya bilgisayarınızdan seçmek için tıklayın. KVKK Aydınlatma Metni'ni okudum. *. Açık Rıza *: Bu formda paylaştığım kişisel ...
- Da Vinci Robotik Cerrahi Nedir? - Doruk Hastaneleri
1 day ago ... KİŞİSEL VERİLERİN KORUNMASI | ÇEREZ POLİTİKASI | ÇEREZ TERCİHLERİ | GİZLİLİK VE KULLANIM POLİTİKALARI. Bu sitenin içeriğinin ve görsellerinin ...
- Haberler | Doruk Hastaneleri
26 Ekim Dünya Hasta Hakları Günü. 26 Ekim Dünya Hasta Hakları Günü'nde Doruk Sağlık Grubu olarak, Özel Doruk Setbaşı Tıp Merkezi'nde hastalarımızla bu ...
This control reviews indexed-search discoverability only. It does not establish that a document is current or present on the live website, and legal compliance was not verified.
Legal Check (Sectoral & Jurisdiction Legal Intelligence)
ip_estimateScore Breakdown
Top Legal Gaps
- Strengthen the public privacy notice with clearly layered purposes, legal basis, rights, transfers and retention information.
- Provide discoverable cookie information and verify usable consent/preferences behavior in a rendered browser.
- Provide a distinct patient-facing explanation of sensitive health-data handling under the Türkiye-market transparency lens.
Sector-Critical Findings
Benchmark summary: Comparison covers discoverability, patient and health-data transparency, rights and complaints, policy layering, market localization, accessibility and observable implementation; global references do not import foreign legal rules or certify legal equivalence.
Evidence Ledger
Evidence scope: legal completeness and applicability. A Trust Basics PASS can confirm that a public surface was detected while this card still reports WARN for incomplete content. Indexed-search availability is assessed separately and does not override either result.
Verified Legal Topics
Evaluated Legal Criteria
Core Legal Surfaces
Consent & Implementation
Benchmark Reference Records
How this score is calculated: Legal Check combines applicable jurisdiction/market transparency (45%), sector-specific legal transparency (25%), observable implementation (15%), maturity against curated sector benchmarks (10%), and freshness/ownership signals (5%). The audit evaluates public website evidence for online-reputation and transparency purposes; it is not a legal opinion or certification.
Audit-market context: The market is taken from the country selected for the audit. If no country is selected, ALO.NET Audit estimates the market from the auditor’s IP connection. Market context guides localized comparison; it does not by itself determine the audited company’s governing law.
Benchmark corpus: Comparison uses a versioned, periodically reviewed benchmark and regulatory-reference corpus. Legal pages and guidance can change over time, so the result reflects the corpus version and evidence collected for this audit.
Engine legal-check-engine-v1.0.0 · Jurisdiction pack tr-legal-transparency-v1.0.0 · Corpus healthcare-benchmarks-2026-q3-v1
Competitive Reputation Context
The available public evidence does not support a comparable-peer or overall reputation classification for this sector context.
Comparable peers must match sector, business model, brand scale and market context. Each reputation platform is interpreted as its own layer; Google Maps ratings are not blended with Tripadvisor, Trustpilot, OTA, social, SERP or PageSpeed signals.
Public reputation should be framed as patient decision confidence, not popularity. Weak doctor identity, weak clinic trust signals, missing medical disclaimers, poor structured data, or thin educational content should be read as patient trust and medical decision journey risks.
Sector classification is based on bounded audited-root evidence. Each row-level observation remains separately limited by its stated crawl, provider and verification conditions.
Semantic Check
This marketing-oriented comparison examines whether homepage promise, navigation intent and conversion actions remain semantically coherent across the public website evidence collected for this audit.
Evaluated findings may contribute to Verified Checks, which is separate from the future 100-point KPI score. A Not verifiable Navigation-to-Landing Alignment is a WARN coverage state, never a failure; other unavailable, unverified and informational evidence is excluded.
The homepage primary promise names a concrete offer and supporting copy reinforces the same commercial meaning.
- Doruk Sağlık Grubu — Bursa’da kapsamlı sağlık hizmetleri ve ileri tıbbi teknoloji — https://doruktip.com/
- Geniş tıbbi birim yelpazesi, ileri görüntüleme ve cerrahi teknoloji altyapısıyla ayakta ve yatarak sağlık hizmetleri — https://doruktip.com/
The evaluated CTA actions align with their observable native action or destination purpose.
- Online Randevu — https://services.doruktip.com/super-app/online-randevu/
- event_available Online Randevu — https://services.doruktip.com/super-app/online-randevu/
- event_available Online Randevu Al arrow_forward — https://services.doruktip.com/super-app/online-randevu/
The evaluated first-party footer prose is coherent with the explicitly declared page locale.
- Doruk Sağlık Grubu, 1998'den bu yana Bursa'da hastaneleri ve tıp merkezleriyle ayakta ve yatarak sağlık hizmeti vermektedir. Hastanelerimiz Doruk Özel Nilüfer Hastanesi Doruk Özel Yıldırım Hastanesi Doruk Özel Bursa Hastanesi Tüm Hastaneler Hızlı Menü Tıbbi Birimler Doktorlar Haberler Videolar Doruk Mobil Uygulaması Ge — https://doruktip.com/
Not verifiable: A live, domain-matched Google description was not available, so marketing relevance was not inferred from publisher metadata.
Frontend Interaction Check
This interaction-oriented review examines whether public contact details and conversion controls expose usable native actions in the collected website evidence.
Source markup does not by itself prove visual clickability. A Not observed contact or CTA input is a FAIL only after accessible bounded source evidence was evaluated; browser-required, restricted and unverified observations are excluded from Verified Checks and canonical KPI scoring.
The observed phone value has a matching native action in source markup.
The observed email value has a matching native action in source markup.
Address contact text was not reliably observed in the bounded homepage evidence.
At least one primary CTA exposes a native destination or form action in source markup.
Not verifiable: Source markup cannot prove visual affordance, pointer hit testing, overlay interference, focus visibility or runtime activation.
Trust Basic Web Scraping
Evidence scope: audited-site observation. A green dot means the signal was detected from the audited entry point or bounded first-party evidence. It does not mean the same information was available to the indexed-search provider or that its legal completeness was verified.
Insufficient evidence for a Trust Score. The badge reports detected ten-item Trust Basics; unresolved criteria remain neutral and are not counted as failures.
Logo Consistency / Visual Identity
Schema.org Basic Check
Google SERP Preview
Google SERP stands for Google Search Engine Results Page — the page of results shown when someone searches online for a brand, product, person, service, or related topic. It is often the very first impression a potential customer, partner, or journalist has of the searched entity. Optimizing these elements is frequently one of the highest-return SEO actions available, because it can influence click-through rate before the visitor ever lands on the website.
Note: The preview below is based on publisher-provided page metadata, structured data and accessible page content for doruktip.com; it is not a live Google result scrape or capture. Google may show different title links, snippets and sitelinks by query, locale, device, language and index timing.
AI Search Readiness
Six query-scoped observations distinguish page matching, search-assisted answers, source exposure, brand mentions and recommendations. These observations describe the captured query and response, not general AI visibility or ranking. Unverified observations are excluded from Check Score.
Measured observations: 5/6 · Unverified: 1/6. Check Score uses the evaluated observations.
Audited AI query: Doruk Sağlık Grubu Nilüfer önerilir mi?
BRANDED AI QUERY FETCHED PUBLISHER SOURCE
Query: Doruk Sağlık Grubu Nilüfer önerilir mi? · Observed: 2026-10-08T21:38:43+00:00
https://doruktip.com/SEARCH ASSISTED AI ANSWER CAPTURED
Query: Doruk Sağlık Grubu Nilüfer önerilir mi? · Observed: 2026-10-08T21:38:43+00:00
OWN DOMAIN IN AI REFERENCES
Query: Doruk Sağlık Grubu Nilüfer önerilir mi? · Observed: 2026-10-08T21:38:43+00:00
EXACT BRAND IN AI ANSWER
Query: Doruk Sağlık Grubu Nilüfer önerilir mi? · Observed: 2026-10-08T21:38:43+00:00
No complete, scope-matched observation was captured for this measurement.
Query: Doruk Sağlık Grubu Nilüfer önerilir mi? · Observed: 2026-10-08T21:38:43+00:00
BRAND MENTION HAS ATTACHED CITATION
Query: Doruk Sağlık Grubu Nilüfer önerilir mi? · Observed: 2026-10-08T21:38:43+00:00
Captured answer and citations
Complete captured mapping. Links show provider attachments to answer blocks; source support for every claim is not independently verified.
Doruk Özel Nilüfer Hastanesi, sahip olduğu ileri teknolojik altyapı, geniş yatak kapasitesi ve kalite standartları sayesinde Bursa'da sıkça tavsiye edilen özel sağlık merkezlerinden biridir, ancak bireysel deneyimler ilgili hekimin uzmanlığına ve sigorta/ücret politikalarına bağlı olarak değişiklik gösterebilir.
https://doruktip.com/hastaneler/doruk-ozel-nilufer-hastanesi/
Fiziksel ve Teknolojik Altyapı
Bina ve Kapasite: 55.000 metrekarelik kapalı alanda, 370 yatak kapasitesi, 13 ameliyathane ve 78 yoğun bakım yatağı ile Doruk Özel Nilüfer Hastanesi bölgedeki en büyük özel sağlık komplekslerinden biridir.
https://doruktip.com/hastaneler/doruk-ozel-nilufer-hastanesi/
https://doruktip.com/hastaneler/doruk-ozel-nilufer-hastanesi/
İleri Donanım: Kurum bünyesinde Da Vinci robotik cerrahi sistemi, TrueBeam radyoterapi cihazı, intraoperatif 3 Tesla MR ve hibrit ameliyathane gibi gelişmiş tıbbi teknolojiler aktif olarak kullanılmaktadır.
https://doruktip.com/hastaneler/doruk-ozel-nilufer-hastanesi/
Kalite ve Akreditasyon
TÜSKA Belgesi: Hastane, Türkiye Sağlık Hizmetleri Kalite ve Akreditasyon Enstitüsü (TÜSKA) tarafından altın akreditasyon belgesi alan Bursa'daki ilk hastane unvanına sahiptir.
https://doruktip.com/hastaneler/doruk-ozel-nilufer-hastanesi/
Kapsamlı Hizmet: 7/24 acil servis, kapsamlı yoğun bakım üniteleri ve uluslararası sağlık turizmi yetki belgesiyle geniş bir yelpatede hizmet verir.
https://doruktip.com/hastaneler/doruk-ozel-nilufer-hastanesi/
Karar Verirken Dikkat Edilmesi Gerekenler
Hekim Odaklı Deneyim: Her büyük hastanede olduğu gibi hastane genelinden ziyade muayene veya ameliyat olacağınız hekimin yaklaşımı ve uzmanlığı memnuniyetinizi doğrudan belirler.
Sigorta ve Maliyet: Tedavi masrafları veya paket fiyatları dönemsel olarak değişebilir. Gitmeden önce Doruk Sağlık Grubu resmi merkezini arayarak Anlaşmalı Kurumlar ve Sigortalar listesinde poliçenizin geçerli olup olmadığını teyit etmeniz önerilir.
Hangi branş, doktor veya tedavi için hastaneyi değerlendiriyorsunuz? Belirtirseniz o bölümle ilgili bilinen detayları ve süreçleri paylaşabilirim.
Supporting technical observations
About: PASS · Contact: PASS · Schema types: Hospital, PostalAddress, BreadcrumbList, ListItem, WebSite, SearchAction. Technical presence supports interpretation; it does not prove an AI answer, recommendation, citation or indexing.
