See historic audits
Approved audits, including the current report. Hover or focus a point for values; select it to open the report.
Online Reputation
Executive Summary
Checks Passed
50 checks were evaluated within the available access and audit scope. 28 are PASS; 18 are WARN and 4 are FAIL. These counts show the results of evaluated checks, not a weighted quality score.
Executive Scoreboard
Executive Strength / Risk
This audit provides a consolidated executive view of how a brand’s digital presence supports—or weakens—its online reputation and the value of its digital investments. It evaluates key public indicators across semantic visibility, technical performance, legal and trust signals, platform consistency, reputation strength, and sector-specific competitive context. Rather than treating these signals in isolation, the audit examines their relationships and relevant correlations with commercial performance. Its final goal is to give senior executives a clear, evidence-based basis for identifying gaps, challenging internal assumptions, prioritizing corrective action, and making better-informed digital investment decisions.
Audit Report Definitions
Check Score
Audited online-presence quality indicator: PASS / (PASS + WARN + FAIL) × 100. Unverified and unavailable checks are excluded. This is not an overall brand or revenue score.
Verified Checks
Shows the checks ALO.NET Audit could evaluate using concrete evidence in this report. For example, 20/37 Verified Checks means that 20 of the 37 evaluated checks received PASS; the remainder may be WARN or FAIL. Unavailable, Unverified and excluded checks are outside this total.
Trust Basics
Summarizes basic website trust signals, including organizational identity, contact information, essential policies and trust infrastructure that help visitors and digital systems assess a website. It indicates basic trust hygiene and is neither a legal compliance certificate nor an overall reputation score.
Evidence Captured
Shows how many applicable checks have enough evidence for evaluation. For example, 48/83 means that usable evidence was obtained for 48 of 83 applicable checks. A higher value indicates broader audit coverage; it does not mean that the website performed well.
First Seen On Internet
Shows an estimated date from which the domain can be observed online. This is not the company incorporation date, the age of the brand or the opening date of a physical business. It provides context about the domain’s observable online history.
Matched Listings Avg. Rating
Shows the average user rating of Google Maps business listings reliably matched to the audited brand or website. Only verified entity matches are included; unrelated businesses with the same or a similar name are excluded. A qualified entity match does not necessarily mean that the listing’s Website field matches the audited domain.
Reviews Across Matched Listings
Shows the total number of user reviews across business listings matched to the brand. It indicates the volume of user feedback and provides context about online visibility. Review volume alone does not establish whether feedback is positive or negative.
Mobile PageSpeed
Shows website performance on mobile devices as a 0–100 score measured using Google Lighthouse/PageSpeed methodology. A higher score generally indicates better loading performance and user experience. This technical performance measure is produced by Google and is independent of the ALO.NET Check Score.
Executive Scoreboard
Provides an at-a-glance executive overview of key audit areas. Each row represents a different area and shows its PASS, WARN and FAIL results or the relevant system’s native score. Rows may use different measurement types, so their values should not always be compared directly as equivalent scores.
Legal Check
Examines whether essential legal and privacy information is accessible to users and search systems, together with related requirements that can be evaluated within the audit scope. ALO.NET Audit does not provide legal advice, and this result is not a legal compliance certificate.
AI Search Readiness
Separates captured query/page matching, search-assisted answers, own-domain sources, brand mentions, explicit recommendations and citation-free mentions. Results apply to the recorded query, market and response; unavailable observations remain neutral. Technical presence does not guarantee AI visibility or ranking.
Frontend Interaction Check
Examines visible interface and link signals that help visitors reach core actions such as contacting the business, searching, getting directions or making a reservation. Detecting a button or link does not establish that the corresponding action was successfully completed from end to end.
Semantic Quality
Evaluates structural and semantic signals that help people and machines understand page content. Headings, content relationships and related semantic cues help clarify what a page communicates.
PageSpeed | SEO Technical Quality
Summarizes measurable indicators of website performance and technical search readiness. Native PageSpeed/Lighthouse scores are provider measurements, rather than scores recreated by ALO.NET. They indicate technical quality but do not independently predict Google rankings.
Maps & Review Metrics
Evaluates verifiable Google Maps business listings, user ratings, review volume and, when available, comparable market evidence. Its purpose is to show the measurable portion of the brand’s local digital reputation within the audited scope.
Structured Data
Checks for structured data defined in website source code using standards such as Schema.org. This data can help search engines understand organizations, businesses, products, services and other content more accurately.
Social Presence
Evaluates the online presence of social media profiles verified as belonging to the brand. The result reflects verifiable brand presence, rather than follower counts or social media success.
Search Presence
Evaluates verifiable signals about whether the brand and website can be found by search systems. It shows available search visibility evidence and does not guarantee a ranking for any particular keyword.
Social Links
Checks links from the website’s own pages to the brand’s social media profiles. These links help establish an explicit first-party relationship between the website and the social accounts.
PASS / WARN / FAIL
PASS means sufficient positive evidence was found for the evaluated condition. WARN means the result is partly positive but needs attention. FAIL means an evaluated check did not meet the expected condition. These statuses apply only to checks that could actually be evaluated.
Koray Liberte - Göktürk Site Projesi - Koray GYO is a property developer with a portfolio of residential projects, presented through the main brand site and individual project pages. Leadership should focus first on search presentation and customer-facing governance, because the observed weaknesses sit directly on project discovery and comprehension, buyer and investor confidence or sales-enquiry actionability. Further service details and geographic coverage are not added where the collected profile does not substantiate them.
Verified Evidence Positioning Map (Comparable Brands)Comparison scope: Property project · Single real-estate project · Local · mixed or unrecorded brand scales. Compatible saved ALO.NET Audit reports only; separate from Google Maps Comparable Peers.Youramsparkhouse.comparkyasamcinarkoy.cometroresidencesistanbul.comsinpasfinanssehir.commarinadaresidence.com
X: Verified Checks, 0-100 (this audit's eligible-control scale is planned to expand toward 100). Y: verified passes across 28 shared evaluated controls, shown as a count, not a percent. Marker size scales with Verified Checks; legend order and color are identity-only, not a leaderboard.The public decision journey is uneven: search-to-enquiry journey clarity creates the clearest controllable gap, while machine-readable business clarity supplies the strongest verified reassurance. Taken together, the evidence suggests that prospective buyers can encounter credible public proof but still receive an avoidably weak handoff toward project enquiry action. Management can therefore protect the established reputation signal while tightening the point where discovery should become action. see details ↓Brand Verified Checks Shared passes You 28/50 16/28 ramsparkhouse.com 28/60 11/28 parkyasamcinarkoy.com 22/58 11/28 etroresidencesistanbul.com 33/58 16/28 sinpasfinanssehir.com 27/51 13/28 marinadaresidence.com 21/47 14/28
Observed weakness: Search-to-enquiry journey clarity is the selected weakness. The audited entry point did not present consistently decision-ready publisher search copy. This is high-confidence decision-journey evidence for the search-to-enquiry journey; it does not establish the live Google result, prospective buyers' response, conversion or revenue. see details ↓
Observed strength: Machine-readable business clarity is the selected strength. Structured entity data was detected. This is high-confidence search and entity evidence. It does not verify search eligibility, visibility or customer response. No material strength cleared the evidence and materiality threshold in this audit. see details ↓
Management Decision: Management should assign a named owner and review date to search-to-enquiry journey clarity, then use a relevant first-party journey indicator to test whether the exposure is reduced. It should preserve machine-readable business clarity as a managed public strength while keeping the conclusion within the cited confidence, cohort and measurement limits. see details ↓
search-to-enquiry journey clarity: Observed evidence: Publisher-controlled search messaging is not consistently decision-ready. Why management should care: The first search interaction may not communicate the project proposition or enquiry next step clearly enough for buyers. What could go wrong: Buyer search demand may reach the site without a clear project proposition or enquiry route. see details ↓
machine-readable business clarity: Observed evidence: Structured entity data was detected. Management value: Search platforms may receive an incomplete relationship between the developer, project, sales office and offer. The public signal should be protected, but it is not proof of a commercial outcome. see details ↓
customer-facing governance: Observed evidence: Legal Check evaluated Developer / project legal responsibility was weak and Legal entity / controller clarity was incomplete. Why management should care: Management may be less able to reconstruct the responsible-entity statement presented at the project enquiry, reservation or buyer-data decision point. see details ↓
90 days Priorities
- What proposition and next step should a buyer see at the search decision point, and who owns its consistency? see details ↓
- Can the business retrieve the responsible-entity statement, including the exact version, timestamp and responsible owner, for the relevant buyer decision? see details ↓
- Do Brand, Digital and Operations agree on the canonical entity, location and offer relationships that public platforms should understand? see details ↓
90-Day Priority Actions
- Improve the measured publisher-controlled search metadata, then recheck.Measured evidence supports a bounded remediation; ranking uses the recorded score gap, relevance weight, confidence and actionability.
- Correct the verified identity inconsistency on the evidenced assets.Measured evidence supports a bounded remediation; ranking uses the recorded score gap, relevance weight, confidence and actionability.
- Review and correct the measured policy-disclosure weakness.Measured evidence supports a bounded remediation; ranking uses the recorded score gap, relevance weight, confidence and actionability.
Google PageSpeed/SEO — korayliberte.com/tr
Page speed shapes first impressions before a single word is read. A low Performance score — especially on mobile — means visitors leave before engaging. Google uses Core Web Vitals as a ranking signal, so poor speed hurts discoverability. The SEO score here reflects technical crawlability only, not full SEO strength. Accessibility measures inclusivity. Best Practices flags security and standards compliance. Together, these reveal how seriously the digital asset is maintained.
Google Maps Reviews
Matched Google Maps listing: Koray Liberte - Koray Upland Satış Ofisi
This comparison is limited to the qualified Google Maps listing for the audited entity.
Other eligible branches require branch selection for separate benchmarking.
Based on 9 quality-qualified current Single real-estate project peers in active-sale project candidates within the bounded 5 km, 15 km and 30 km radius policy of the audited location expanded up to 30 km, the current review-footprint distribution is kept separate from age-adjusted eligibility. Cohort validity: valid; sample confidence: Low.
Age-adjusted review volume uses 5 eligible peers. At the focal listing's observed online age, P25 / median / P75 are 5 / 10 / 11 reviews; the audited listing has 31.
Its 4.2 Google rating is above the peer median of 4.1. Rating-eligible peer sample: 8. Audited rating percentile: 69th percentile.
Source: Google Maps · Benchmark methodology: ALO.NET
Competitive Google Maps Review Volume vs Comparable Peers
Directional: below peer marketCurrent review footprint - not Review Momentum and not age-normalized.
The current bounded sample directionally places the audited listing's Google Maps review footprint below the qualified peer distribution; this is not a decision-grade market classification.
9 comparable Google Maps peers | Low sample confidence | cohort validity: valid | current raw review-count distribution | ALO.NET methodology | calculated 2026-09-22 | broad property-project candidates around the exact audited project before comparability qualification | Attempted radii: 5 km, 15 km, 30 km.
Competitive Reputation Position
Directional: rating above medianTwo directional Google Maps sample percentiles shown together - not a synthetic score or market classification.
Bubbles prioritize the highest-review paired peers; all paired peers remain in both axis statistics.
- 1. NEW INN - Serviced Apar… · 4.1 / 203
- 2. Toplu Konut Sitesi · 4.3 / 149
- 3. Basaksehir Real Estate … · 3.9 / 127
- 4. Grand Residence by NEW … · 3.5 / 68
- 5. Prive Kemer · 4.2 / 51
- 6. Garden grand residence · 4.1 / 36
- 7. Istanbul Apartments · 4.0 / 29
- 8. Istanbul Apartments - A… · 4.7 / 12
Competitive read: The current bounded sample places rating above and review volume below its median.
8 paired comparable Google Maps peers | Low sample confidence | cohort validity: valid | shared persisted Rating ∩ Review Volume peer-ID denominator | median crosshair = paired-cohort 50th percentile | ALO.NET methodology | calculated 2026-09-22 | Attempted radii: 5 km, 15 km, 30 km.
ALO.NET KPI Profile
Six-pillar evidence coverage and status distribution. Verified Checks remains separate and no KPI maturity score is inferred.
Where is verified KPI evidence concentrated?
Raw deterministic evidence states are compared across all six approved pillars. Bar length is a count, not maturity or a KPI score.
Canonical findings and evidence ownership
Verified capabilities and gaps retain their evidence scope. Source observations do not prove rendered interaction. Findings are ordered by status and control ID; commercial impact is not ranked.
Online Discoverability
- Verified capability: Facebook profile linkage · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Instagram profile linkage · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: YouTube profile linkage · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: LinkedIn profile linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Pinterest profile linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: TikTok profile linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: X profile linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Declared location linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: Search result language consistency · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
Reputation & Trust
- Verified capability: Blocklist exposure · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: SPF policy · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Facebook public profile presence · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: Instagram public profile presence · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: YouTube public profile presence · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: Instagram visual identity · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: YouTube visual identity · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: About identity evidence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Secure connection · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Site icon presence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: X public profile presence · FAIL · Platform evidence
- Verified gap: Cross-channel visual identity · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Comparable rating position · WARN · Platform evidence
- Verified gap: Matched listing rating · WARN · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: DMARC policy · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Facebook visual identity · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: X visual identity · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Content freshness evidence · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
Website Experience & Performance
- Verified capability: Desktop lab performance · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Accessibility markup basics · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Image format hygiene · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Responsive viewport declaration · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Mobile lab performance · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
Measurement & Conversion Readiness
- Verified capability: Contact path evidence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Rendered interaction evidence · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Source observation: Directions markup actionability · INFORMATIONAL · Publisher-controlled surface — The observed address is linked to a map or directions destination in source markup.
- Source observation: Email markup actionability · INFORMATIONAL · Publisher-controlled surface — The observed email value has a matching native action in source markup.
- Source observation: Phone markup actionability · INFORMATIONAL · Publisher-controlled surface — The observed phone value has a matching native action in source markup.
- Source observation: Primary CTA markup · INFORMATIONAL · Publisher-controlled surface — At least one primary CTA exposes a native destination or form action in source markup.
Semantic & AI Readiness
- Verified capability: Locale content coherence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Organization structured identity · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Conversion intent alignment · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Machine readability basics · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Navigation intent alignment · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Primary offer clarity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Local business structured identity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Breadcrumb structured data · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Product or service structured identity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Review structured data · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Search result message relevance · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: Search message cross-reference · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
Legal & Privacy Governance
- Verified capability: Benchmark legal quality · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Implementation legal quality · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: On-site Legal Discoverability & Freshness · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Cookie notice presence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Privacy policy presence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Terms presence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Sector legal quality · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Freshness legal quality · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Jurisdiction legal quality · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Cookie & Consent · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Developer / Project Legal Identity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Privacy / Data Protection · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Rights / Privacy Contact · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Lead & Form Transparency · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Property Marketing Disclosures · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Cookie policy indexed discoverability · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: Privacy & data protection indexed discoverability · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: Project legal disclaimer indexed discoverability · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: Sales & reservation terms indexed discoverability · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
How do Mobile and Desktop Lighthouse results compare?
This compares the stored Lighthouse category results by device; the four categories are not averaged into a new score.
How is Google Maps review volume distributed across matched locations?
Bar length represents review volume only; rating is shown separately in labels and details.
Where does the focal branch sit within its eligible peer cohort?
The focal branch review count is compared with age-normalized peer review-count percentiles using the existing branch-level matching contract.
Accessible KPI evidence table
| Pillar | Evaluated / applicable | PASS | WARN | FAIL | Unverified | Unavailable | Evidence coverage | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Online Discoverability | 3 / 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3 of 9 applicable controls evaluated | Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control |
| Reputation & Trust | 14 / 18 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 14 of 18 applicable controls evaluated | Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control |
| Website Experience & Performance | 5 / 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 of 5 applicable controls evaluated | Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control |
| Measurement & Conversion Readiness | 1 / 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 of 6 applicable controls evaluated | Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control |
| Semantic & AI Readiness | 10 / 12 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 10 of 12 applicable controls evaluated | Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control |
| Legal & Privacy Governance | 13 / 19 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 13 of 19 applicable controls evaluated | Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control |
Accessible PageSpeed data table
| Device | Performance | Accessibility | Best Practices | SEO | Source collection time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 60 | 67 | 96 | 92 | 2026-09-22T00:18:39.772Z |
| Desktop | 83 | 67 | 92 | 92 | 2026-09-22T00:18:39.289Z |
Accessible Maps location data table
| Location | Reviews | Rating | Focal status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Koray Liberte - Koray Upland Satış Ofisi | 31 | 4.2 | Selected focal branch |
| Koray Liberte | 8 | 2.5 | Matched location |
Google-Indexed Legal Discoverability
Indexed-search discoverability only. This is separate from audited-site presence in Trust Basics and content completeness in Legal Check.
Not evaluated — the indexed source has accepted this domain and is still preparing it.
This control reviews indexed-search discoverability only. It does not establish that a document is current or present on the live website, and legal compliance was not verified.
Legal Check (Sectoral & Jurisdiction Legal Intelligence)
ip_estimateScore Breakdown
Top Legal Gaps
- Strengthen the public privacy notice with clearly layered purposes, legal basis, rights, transfers and retention information.
- Provide discoverable cookie information and verify usable consent/preferences behavior in a rendered browser.
- Clarify the responsible developer/project company, controller and public contact without treating the Türkiye audit market as proof of entity jurisdiction.
Sector-Critical Findings
Benchmark summary: Comparison covers discoverability, lead-form transparency, developer/project identity, applicable sales or reservation terms, buyer-data handling, claim-specific marketing disclosures and policy layering; Berkeley is a maturity reference only and does not import UK obligations or certify legal equivalence.
Evidence Ledger
Evidence scope: legal completeness and applicability. A Trust Basics PASS can confirm that a public surface was detected while this card still reports WARN for incomplete content. Indexed-search availability is assessed separately and does not override either result.
Verified Legal Topics
Evaluated Legal Criteria
Core Legal Surfaces
Consent & Implementation
Benchmark Reference Records
How this score is calculated: Legal Check combines applicable jurisdiction/market transparency (45%), sector-specific legal transparency (25%), observable implementation (15%), maturity against curated sector benchmarks (10%), and freshness/ownership signals (5%). The audit evaluates public website evidence for online-reputation and transparency purposes; it is not a legal opinion or certification.
Audit-market context: The market is taken from the country selected for the audit. If no country is selected, ALO.NET Audit estimates the market from the auditor’s IP connection. Market context guides localized comparison; it does not by itself determine the audited company’s governing law.
Benchmark corpus: Comparison uses a versioned, periodically reviewed benchmark and regulatory-reference corpus. Legal pages and guidance can change over time, so the result reflects the corpus version and evidence collected for this audit.
Engine legal-check-engine-v1.0.0 · Jurisdiction pack tr-legal-transparency-v1.0.0 · Corpus property-development-benchmarks-2026-q3-v1
Competitive Reputation Context
Directional benchmark: For the selected focal branch, the current Google Maps review footprint is below, with 31 reviews compared with a qualified-peer median of 51. Its 4.2 rating remains above the peer median of 4.1. This branch-level comparison does not represent the complete multi-location brand. This comparison applies only to the documented Google Maps cohort and does not classify overall online reputation. Separately observed mobile PageSpeed at 60/100 may weaken buyer confidence.
Comparable peers must match sector, business model, brand scale and market context. Each reputation platform is interpreted as its own layer; Google Maps ratings are not blended with Tripadvisor, Trustpilot, OTA, social, SERP or PageSpeed signals.
Public digital trust signals affect perceived purchase risk. Weak project transparency, poor company credibility, unclear location/project information, weak social proof, or a poor mobile lead experience should be read as buyer-confidence risk, not only marketing weakness.
Sector classification is based on bounded audited-root evidence. Each row-level observation remains separately limited by its stated crawl, provider and verification conditions.
Semantic Check
This marketing-oriented comparison examines whether homepage promise, navigation intent and conversion actions remain semantically coherent across the public website evidence collected for this audit.
Evaluated findings may contribute to Verified Checks, which is separate from the future 100-point KPI score. A Not verifiable Navigation-to-Landing Alignment is a WARN coverage state, never a failure; other unavailable, unverified and informational evidence is excluded.
Concrete offer language is observable, but the primary homepage promise relies partly on supporting copy for clarity.
- Göktürk, İstanbul'un gözde semtlerinden biri olarak sakin bir yaşam arayanların ve şehrin enerjisini hissetmek isteyenlerin buluşma noktası haline geliyor. Koray Liberte - Göktürk Site Projesi - Koray GYO projesi, bu benzersiz semtte ev sahiplerine özel bir yaşam tarzı sunuyor. — https://korayliberte.com/tr
The phone CTA is actionable, but its tel: target is domestic-only and does not expose an international dialing prefix.
- 0532 306 11 82 — tel:05323061182
- 0212 322 00 42 — tel:02123220042
- +905323061182 — tel:+905323061182
The evaluated first-party footer prose is coherent with the explicitly declared page locale.
- Türkiye'nin lider gayrimenkul yatırım ortaklıklarından Koray GYO, Aralık 1996'da faaliyetine başlamıştır Mayıs 2021 tarihi itibari ile Koray Grubu’nun bir parçası olmuştur. Koray GYO, tüm deneyimini, bilgi birikimini ve enerjisini kentsel yaşamın sürekli gelişen ve değişen gereksinimlerine uygun, insana odaklı projeler — https://korayliberte.com/tr
Not verifiable: A live, domain-matched Google description was not available, so marketing relevance was not inferred from publisher metadata.
Frontend Interaction Check
This interaction-oriented review examines whether public contact details and conversion controls expose usable native actions in the collected website evidence.
Source markup does not by itself prove visual clickability. A Not observed contact or CTA input is a FAIL only after accessible bounded source evidence was evaluated; browser-required, restricted and unverified observations are excluded from Verified Checks and canonical KPI scoring.
The observed phone value has a matching native action in source markup.
The observed email value has a matching native action in source markup.
The observed address is linked to a map or directions destination in source markup.
At least one primary CTA exposes a native destination or form action in source markup.
Not verifiable: Source markup cannot prove visual affordance, pointer hit testing, overlay interference, focus visibility or runtime activation.
Logo Consistency Check
Trust Basic Web Scraping
Evidence scope: audited-site observation. A green dot means the signal was detected from the audited entry point or bounded first-party evidence. It does not mean the same information was available to the indexed-search provider or that its legal completeness was verified.
Schema.org Basic Check
Google SERP Preview
Google SERP stands for Google Search Engine Results Page — the page of results shown when someone searches online for a brand, product, person, service, or related topic. It is often the very first impression a potential customer, partner, or journalist has of the searched entity. Optimizing these elements is frequently one of the highest-return SEO actions available, because it can influence click-through rate before the visitor ever lands on the website.
Note: The preview below is based on publisher-provided page metadata, structured data and accessible page content for korayliberte.com/tr; it is not a live Google result scrape or capture. Google may show different title links, snippets and sitelinks by query, locale, device, language and index timing.
AI Search Readiness
This public-readiness check estimates whether the site is prepared for AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) and GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) outcomes. In this report, AI Search Readiness means the website exposes signals that help AI-driven search systems discover, interpret, trust, and cite the brand accurately.
DNS & Email Trust
Legal Check — Unavailable
No evaluated module detail was retained in this report. Unavailable remains neutral and does not establish a website failure.
