See historic audits
Approved audits, including the current report. Hover or focus a point for values; select it to open the report.
Online Reputation
Executive Summary
Checks Passed
74 checks were evaluated within the available access and audit scope. 40 are PASS; 23 are WARN and 11 are FAIL. These counts show the results of evaluated checks, not a weighted quality score.
Executive Scoreboard
Executive Strength / Risk
This audit provides a consolidated executive view of how a brand’s digital presence supports—or weakens—its online reputation and the value of its digital investments. It evaluates key public indicators across semantic visibility, technical performance, legal and trust signals, platform consistency, reputation strength, and sector-specific competitive context. Rather than treating these signals in isolation, the audit examines their relationships and relevant correlations with commercial performance. Its final goal is to give senior executives a clear, evidence-based basis for identifying gaps, challenging internal assumptions, prioritizing corrective action, and making better-informed digital investment decisions.
Audit Report Definitions
Check Score
Audited online-presence quality indicator: PASS / (PASS + WARN + FAIL) × 100. Unverified and unavailable checks are excluded. This is not an overall brand or revenue score.
Verified Checks
Shows the checks ALO.NET Audit could evaluate using concrete evidence in this report. For example, 20/37 Verified Checks means that 20 of the 37 evaluated checks received PASS; the remainder may be WARN or FAIL. Unavailable, Unverified and excluded checks are outside this total.
Trust Basics
Summarizes basic website trust signals, including organizational identity, contact information, essential policies and trust infrastructure that help visitors and digital systems assess a website. It indicates basic trust hygiene and is neither a legal compliance certificate nor an overall reputation score.
Evidence Captured
Shows how many applicable checks have enough evidence for evaluation. For example, 48/83 means that usable evidence was obtained for 48 of 83 applicable checks. A higher value indicates broader audit coverage; it does not mean that the website performed well.
First Seen On Internet
Shows an estimated date from which the domain can be observed online. This is not the company incorporation date, the age of the brand or the opening date of a physical business. It provides context about the domain’s observable online history.
Matched Listings Avg. Rating
Shows the average user rating of Google Maps business listings reliably matched to the audited brand or website. Only verified entity matches are included; unrelated businesses with the same or a similar name are excluded. A qualified entity match does not necessarily mean that the listing’s Website field matches the audited domain.
Reviews Across Matched Listings
Shows the total number of user reviews across business listings matched to the brand. It indicates the volume of user feedback and provides context about online visibility. Review volume alone does not establish whether feedback is positive or negative.
Mobile PageSpeed
Shows website performance on mobile devices as a 0–100 score measured using Google Lighthouse/PageSpeed methodology. A higher score generally indicates better loading performance and user experience. This technical performance measure is produced by Google and is independent of the ALO.NET Check Score.
Executive Scoreboard
Provides an at-a-glance executive overview of key audit areas. Each row represents a different area and shows its PASS, WARN and FAIL results or the relevant system’s native score. Rows may use different measurement types, so their values should not always be compared directly as equivalent scores.
Legal Check
Examines whether essential legal and privacy information is accessible to users and search systems, together with related requirements that can be evaluated within the audit scope. ALO.NET Audit does not provide legal advice, and this result is not a legal compliance certificate.
AI Search Readiness
Separates captured query/page matching, search-assisted answers, own-domain sources, brand mentions, explicit recommendations and citation-free mentions. Results apply to the recorded query, market and response; unavailable observations remain neutral. Technical presence does not guarantee AI visibility or ranking.
Frontend Interaction Check
Examines visible interface and link signals that help visitors reach core actions such as contacting the business, searching, getting directions or making a reservation. Detecting a button or link does not establish that the corresponding action was successfully completed from end to end.
Semantic Quality
Evaluates structural and semantic signals that help people and machines understand page content. Headings, content relationships and related semantic cues help clarify what a page communicates.
PageSpeed | SEO Technical Quality
Summarizes measurable indicators of website performance and technical search readiness. Native PageSpeed/Lighthouse scores are provider measurements, rather than scores recreated by ALO.NET. They indicate technical quality but do not independently predict Google rankings.
Maps & Review Metrics
Evaluates verifiable Google Maps business listings, user ratings, review volume and, when available, comparable market evidence. Its purpose is to show the measurable portion of the brand’s local digital reputation within the audited scope.
Structured Data
Checks for structured data defined in website source code using standards such as Schema.org. This data can help search engines understand organizations, businesses, products, services and other content more accurately.
Social Presence
Evaluates the online presence of social media profiles verified as belonging to the brand. The result reflects verifiable brand presence, rather than follower counts or social media success.
Search Presence
Evaluates verifiable signals about whether the brand and website can be found by search systems. It shows available search visibility evidence and does not guarantee a ranking for any particular keyword.
Social Links
Checks links from the website’s own pages to the brand’s social media profiles. These links help establish an explicit first-party relationship between the website and the social accounts.
PASS / WARN / FAIL
PASS means sufficient positive evidence was found for the evaluated condition. WARN means the result is partly positive but needs attention. FAIL means an evaluated check did not meet the expected condition. These statuses apply only to checks that could actually be evaluated.
Memorial is a healthcare provider offering medical care, treatment and patient services. Its website highlights Hızlı Erişim and Size Özel. Its public location footprint includes 10 captured Google Maps listings in the selected audit market. The website links to Instagram, Facebook and LinkedIn profiles. The captured AI answer mentions the brand in response to the audited query. Further service details and geographic coverage are not added where the collected profile does not substantiate them.
Memorial Bahçelievler Hastanesi is the representative hospital selected from 9 verified hospitals using the established Maps focal selection after hospital and first-party identity checks. This audit evaluates the submitted entity https://www.memorial.com.tr/. Local competitive context uses one verified operating unit; its entry-page evidence does not replace the full audit identity or evidence. Maps/Nearby presentation refreshed from this audit's retained evidence on 2026-10-13T19:22:46+00:00. Original audit date, findings and scores are unchanged. The saved audit does not retain sufficient verified focal and independent peer entry-page evidence for this comparison. Nearby positioning is unavailable; no peer points or ranking are inferred. Representative Local Market is unavailable for this snapshot. ALO.NET Audited Cohort is the fallback. ALO.NET Audited Cohort: Compatible saved full audits. This population and its historical axes are separate from Local Market web probes.Representative Local Market · Memorial Bahçelievler Hastanesi
Verified Evidence Positioning Map (Nearby Peers)
Evidence data and provenance
Scope Representative Local Market · Memorial Bahçelievler Hastanesi Audited root/entity https://www.memorial.com.tr/ Selected physical unit Memorial Bahçelievler Hastanesi Unit type hospital Matched locations 9 Sector control pack healthcare_local_positioning_v1 First-party entry URL https://www.memorial.com.tr/hastane-ve-tip-merkezleri/bahcelievler/ Entry selection Selected from the persisted first-party and Maps identity evidence. Selection provenance Hospital-primary identity and first-party verification. Selected unit Maps rating 4.7 Selected unit Maps reviews 9974 Entry-page evidence Entry-page evidence could not be verified from the available safe-fetch evidence. Competitor probing Not started because focal entry-page evidence could not be safely verified.
X: Verified Checks, 0-100 (this audit's eligible-control scale is planned to expand toward 100). Y: verified passes across 29 shared evaluated controls, shown as a count, not a percent. Marker size scales with Verified Checks; legend order and color are identity-only, not a leaderboard.Brand Verified Checks Shared passes You 40/74 13/29 medicana.com.tr 31/62 14/29 acibadem.com.tr 36/67 15/29 doruktip.com 34/56 18/29 dorukhospital.com 22/47 13/29 jimer.com.tr 25/53 11/29
Observed weakness: Customer-facing governance is the selected weakness. The evaluated disclosures were: Patient privacy / local equivalent and sensitive health data was incomplete and Legal entity / controller clarity was incomplete. This high-confidence governance evidence is bounded to the appointment or patient-data decision point; it neither proves legal insufficiency nor predicts a patient complaint or dispute. see details ↓
Observed strength: Search-to-care journey clarity is the selected strength. The audited entry point presented usable publisher search copy. This is high-confidence decision-journey evidence for the search-to-care journey; it does not establish the live Google result, patients' response, conversion or revenue. see details ↓
Management Decision: Management should assign a named owner and review date to customer-facing governance, then use a relevant first-party journey indicator to test whether the exposure is reduced. It should preserve search-to-care journey clarity as a managed public strength while keeping the conclusion within the cited confidence, cohort and measurement limits. The review should test whether patients can move from discovery to appointment action without ambiguity, separating observed change from assumed commercial impact. see details ↓
Supporting Market Evidence: Within the Türkiye audit market, Google Maps identified 10 qualified location listings associated with the audited entity. This is market-bounded evidence, not a complete worldwide physical footprint. see details ↓
customer-facing governance: Observed evidence: Legal Check evaluated Patient privacy / local equivalent and sensitive health data was incomplete and Legal entity / controller clarity was incomplete. Why management should care: Management may be less able to reconstruct the relevant patient-facing disclosure and the responsible-entity statement presented at the appointment or patient-data decision point. see details ↓
search-to-care journey clarity: Observed evidence: A domain-matched live Google result was captured. Management value: The first search interaction may not communicate service relevance or the appointment next step clearly enough for patients. The public signal should be protected, but it is not proof of a commercial outcome. see details ↓
public location and review visibility: Observed evidence: 4.7/5.0 from 53,457 reviews. Management value: Patient discovery and location confidence can vary by listing rather than by one consistent provider practice. The public signal should be protected, but it is not proof of a commercial outcome. see details ↓
Audit Scope: Audit market: Türkiye. The market was estimated from the auditor's IP connection at submission. Google SERP and Google Maps evidence is limited to this market, including for global brands; the audit does not automatically classify the entity as global or regional. see details ↓
90 days Priorities
- What proposition and next step should a patient see at the search decision point, and who owns its consistency? see details ↓
- What evidence will demonstrate that the selected corrective action changed the measured outcome? see details ↓
- Does one accountable executive own listing accuracy, review response and escalation across every verified location? see details ↓
90-Day Priority Actions
- Improve the measured publisher-controlled search metadata, then recheck.Measured evidence supports a bounded remediation; ranking uses the recorded score gap, relevance weight, confidence and actionability.
- Correct the verified identity inconsistency on the evidenced assets.Measured evidence supports a bounded remediation; ranking uses the recorded score gap, relevance weight, confidence and actionability.
- Review and correct the measured policy-disclosure weakness.Measured evidence supports a bounded remediation; ranking uses the recorded score gap, relevance weight, confidence and actionability.
Google PageSpeed/SEO — www.memorial.com.tr
Page speed shapes first impressions before a single word is read. A low Performance score — especially on mobile — means visitors leave before engaging. Google uses Core Web Vitals as a ranking signal, so poor speed hurts discoverability. The SEO score here reflects technical crawlability only, not full SEO strength. Accessibility measures inclusivity. Best Practices flags security and standards compliance. Together, these reveal how seriously the digital asset is maintained.
Evidence details ▾
Mobile: FAIL (11926.07133155 ms) [stale]; Desktop: PASS (2321.0648659071 ms) [stale]. Lighthouse lab measurement of the tested entry; not field Core Web Vitals.
Mobile: FAIL (0.25482849631793 unitless) [stale]; Desktop: PASS (0.047749636014837 unitless) [stale]. Lighthouse lab measurement of the tested entry; not field Core Web Vitals.
Mobile: WARN (450 ms) [stale]; Desktop: WARN (223.5 ms) [stale]. Lab main-thread blocking proxy; not field INP or verified real-user responsiveness.
Mobile: FAIL [stale]; Desktop: FAIL [stale]. Automated tested-page markup finding; not whole-site accessibility or WCAG compliance.
Mobile: PASS [stale]; Desktop: PASS [stale]. Automated tested-page markup finding; not whole-site accessibility or WCAG compliance.
Mobile: PASS [stale]; Desktop: PASS [stale]. Tested entry indexing directives only; no proof of search inclusion, robots access or whole-site crawlability. Intentional noindex needs publisher review.
Maps/Nearby presentation refreshed from this audit's retained evidence on 2026-10-13T19:22:46+00:00. Original audit date, findings and scores are unchanged.
Google Maps Reviews
Retained Maps records do not establish the required audited-domain identity and available metrics. Updated Maps ratings and Nearby qualification are withheld.
ALO.NET KPI Profile
Six-pillar evidence coverage and status distribution. Verified Checks remains separate and no KPI maturity score is inferred.
Where is verified KPI evidence concentrated?
Raw deterministic evidence states are compared across all six approved pillars. Bar length is a count, not maturity or a KPI score.
Canonical findings and evidence ownership
Verified capabilities and gaps retain their evidence scope. Source observations do not prove rendered interaction. Findings are ordered by status and control ID; commercial impact is not ranked.
Online Discoverability
- Verified capability: Facebook profile linkage · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Instagram profile linkage · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: LinkedIn profile linkage · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: X profile linkage · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: YouTube profile linkage · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Entry-page indexing directives · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface — Mobile: PASS [stale]; Desktop: PASS [stale]. Tested entry indexing directives only; no proof of search inclusion, robots access or whole-site crawlability. Intentional noindex needs publisher review.
- Verified capability: Publisher description quality · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Search result language consistency · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified gap: Publisher title quality · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Pinterest profile linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: TikTok profile linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Declared location linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
Reputation & Trust
- Verified capability: Blocklist exposure · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: SPF policy · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Facebook public profile presence · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: Instagram public profile presence · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: LinkedIn public profile presence · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: X public profile presence · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: YouTube public profile presence · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: Instagram visual identity · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: YouTube visual identity · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Matched listing rating · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: About identity evidence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Site icon presence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Cross-channel visual identity · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Facebook visual identity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: LinkedIn visual identity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Secure connection · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: DMARC policy · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: X visual identity · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Comparable rating position · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: Content freshness evidence · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
Website Experience & Performance
- Verified capability: Accessible button names · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface — Mobile: PASS [stale]; Desktop: PASS [stale]. Automated tested-page markup finding; not whole-site accessibility or WCAG compliance.
- Verified capability: Form input labels · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface — Mobile: PASS [stale]; Desktop: PASS [stale]. Automated tested-page markup finding; not whole-site accessibility or WCAG compliance.
- Verified capability: Desktop lab performance · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Accessibility markup basics · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Responsive viewport declaration · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Accessible link names · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface — Mobile: FAIL [stale]; Desktop: FAIL [stale]. Automated tested-page markup finding; not whole-site accessibility or WCAG compliance.
- Verified gap: Layout stability (lab) · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface — Mobile: FAIL (0.25482849631793 unitless) [stale]; Desktop: PASS (0.047749636014837 unitless) [stale]. Lighthouse lab measurement of the tested entry; not field Core Web Vitals.
- Verified gap: Largest contentful paint (lab) · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface — Mobile: FAIL (11926.07133155 ms) [stale]; Desktop: PASS (2321.0648659071 ms) [stale]. Lighthouse lab measurement of the tested entry; not field Core Web Vitals.
- Verified gap: Mobile lab performance · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Blocking responsiveness proxy (lab) · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface — Mobile: WARN (450 ms) [stale]; Desktop: WARN (223.5 ms) [stale]. Lab main-thread blocking proxy; not field INP or verified real-user responsiveness.
- Verified gap: Image format hygiene · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
Measurement & Conversion Readiness
- Verified capability: Tag manager declaration · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface — Explicit declaration detected in inspected entry source. Presence does not establish execution, events, conversions or form delivery.
- Verified capability: Contact path evidence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Directions markup actionability · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Email markup actionability · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Analytics script declaration · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface — Not detected from the inspected entry source; deferred or consent-dependent loading remains possible. Presence does not establish execution, events, conversions or form delivery.
- Evidence gap: Rendered interaction evidence · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Source observation: Phone markup actionability · INFORMATIONAL · Publisher-controlled surface — The observed phone value has a matching native action in source markup.
- Source observation: Primary CTA markup · INFORMATIONAL · Publisher-controlled surface — At least one primary CTA exposes a native destination or form action in source markup.
Semantic & AI Readiness
- Verified capability: Brand Mentioned · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: Search / Fan-out Observed · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: Organization structured identity · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Brand Recommended · FAIL · Platform evidence
- Verified gap: Own Domain Exposed · FAIL · Platform evidence
- Verified gap: Citation-free Mention · WARN · Platform evidence
- Verified gap: Conversion intent alignment · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Navigation intent alignment · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Primary offer clarity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Local business structured identity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Breadcrumb structured data · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Product or service structured identity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Review structured data · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Search result message relevance · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: Query / Page Match · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: Locale content coherence · UNAVAILABLE · Publisher-controlled surface
Legal & Privacy Governance
- Verified capability: Benchmark legal quality · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Freshness legal quality · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Implementation legal quality · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Cookie policy indexed discoverability · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: Patient rights indexed discoverability · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: Privacy & data protection indexed discoverability · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: Cookie notice presence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Privacy policy presence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Appointment cancellation indexed discoverability · FAIL · Platform evidence
- Verified gap: Jurisdiction legal quality · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Sector legal quality · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Cookie & Consent · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Healthcare Entity / Controller Identity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: On-site Legal Discoverability & Freshness · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Patient Privacy & Sensitive Health Data · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Privacy / Data Protection · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Accessibility / Patient-Facing Transparency · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Appointment & Medical Form Transparency · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Patient Rights / Complaints · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Terms presence · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
How do Mobile and Desktop Lighthouse results compare?
This compares the stored Lighthouse category results by device; the four categories are not averaged into a new score.
How is Google Maps review volume distributed across matched locations?
Bar length represents review volume only; rating is shown separately in labels and details.
Percentiles withheld: a defensible branch-level peer matching unit was not established.
Evidence readiness: CURRENT cohort 2/3 · Rating eligible 2/3 · Age adjusted 0/5. 3 are the minimum usable sample; 5 are targeted for normal publication.
Accessible KPI evidence table
| Pillar | Evaluated / applicable | PASS | WARN | FAIL | Unverified | Unavailable | Evidence coverage | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Online Discoverability | 9 / 12 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9 of 12 applicable controls evaluated | Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control |
| Reputation & Trust | 16 / 20 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 16 of 20 applicable controls evaluated | Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control |
| Website Experience & Performance | 11 / 11 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 11 of 11 applicable controls evaluated | Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control |
| Measurement & Conversion Readiness | 5 / 8 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 of 8 applicable controls evaluated | Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control |
| Semantic & AI Readiness | 13 / 16 | 3 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 13 of 16 applicable controls evaluated | Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control |
| Legal & Privacy Governance | 16 / 20 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 16 of 20 applicable controls evaluated | Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control |
Accessible PageSpeed data table
| Device | Performance | Accessibility | Best Practices | SEO | Source collection time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 37 | 91 | 88 | 92 | 2026-10-05T01:29:18.254Z |
| Desktop | 80 | 91 | 92 | 92 | 2026-10-05T01:29:18.118Z |
Accessible Maps location data table
| Location | Reviews | Rating | Focal status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memorial Bahçelievler Hastanesi | 9974 | 4.7 | Selected focal branch |
| Memorial Ataşehir Hospital | 8537 | 4.7 | Matched location |
| Memorial Şişli Hastanesi | 8422 | 4.7 | Matched location |
| Memorial Ankara Hastanesi | 7304 | 4.6 | Matched location |
| Memorial Kayseri Hastanesi | 7286 | 4.7 | Matched location |
| Memorial Antalya Hastanesi | 5916 | 4.7 | Matched location |
| Memorial Dicle Hastanesi | 4683 | 4.7 | Matched location |
| Memorial Göztepe Hastanesi | 734 | 4.6 | Matched location |
| Memorial Bodrum Hastanesi | 586 | 4.5 | Matched location |
| Starbucks Memorial Hospital | 15 | 1.7 | Matched location |
Measurement & Conversion Readiness
Evidence details ▾
Not detected from the inspected entry source; deferred or consent-dependent loading remains possible. Presence does not establish execution, events, conversions or form delivery.
Explicit declaration detected in inspected entry source. Presence does not establish execution, events, conversions or form delivery.
Google-Indexed Legal Discoverability
Indexed-search discoverability only. This is separate from audited-site presence in Trust Basics and content completeness in Legal Check.
Indexed-search coverage: 8 of 19 concept-locale checks were evaluated; 6 were clearly discoverable, 0 were weak or ambiguous, 2 were not detected, and 11 were unavailable. An unavailable indexed-search check is not evidence that the policy is absent from the live website.
Strongest indexed evidenceMemorial - Google Play'de Uygulamalar
Indexed evidence URLs, titles and snippets
- Memorial - Google Play'de Uygulamalar
Google Play'de kişiselleştirme; settingsAyarlar. Gizlilik Politikası • Hizmet Şartları · Oyunlar · Uygulamalar · Filmler ve TV · Kitaplar · Çocuklar. Simge ...
- Kişisel Verilerin Korunması - Memorial
Bu sorumluluğumuzun bilinci ile 6698 sayılı Kişisel Verilerin Korunması Kanunu (“Kanun”) ve ilgili mevzuat kapsamında Veri Sorumlusu sıfatıyla, kişisel ...
- Evde Sağlık Kişisel Verilerin İşlenmesine İlişkin Aydınlatma Metni
- Privacy Policy and Terms of Use - Memorial
Privacy Policy and Terms of Use ... This e-mail and any attachments are private and confidential to the person(s) whom it is adressed, and may contain personal ...
- clarification information about processing personal data - memorial
Your Rights Regarding Personal Data Protection. According to the related legislation;. To learn if the personal data was processed,; To follow up the ...
- Chemotherapy (Medical Oncology)
Nov 9, 2015 ... ... Personal Data Protection Law. Hereby, I explicitly consent to the processing of my personal data within the specified scope in Privacy ...
- Çerez Politikası - Memorial
Memorial Sağlık Grubu Çerez Politikası. Memorial Sağlık Grubu A.Ş. olarak sahip olduğumuz https://www.memorial.com.tr web sitemizin ziyaretçilerinin ...
- Cookie Policy - Memorial
Cookie Policy. Cookies are small data files placed on your computer by the internet web server through your browser. When a connection is ...
- Hasta Haklari Ofisimiz ve Politikamiz - Memorial
Hasta Hakları ofislerimizde sizlerden gelen geri bildirimleri kalite standartlarına uygun şekilde değerlendirir ve sizlere en kısa sürede memnuniyet odaklı ...
- Our Patient Rights Office and Policy - Memorial
Patient rights aim to protect human health at a high level and to provide high quality health services. Our hospital has been prepared to inform you about the ...
- İnme (Felç) ve Beyin Hasarı Rehabilitasyon Merkezi - Memorial
Bu site reCAPTCHA ile korunmaktadır ve Google Gizlilik Politikası ile Hizmet Şartları geçerlidir. Bilgi Almak İçin Formu Doldurun. Ekibimiz, talebiniz ...
- KİŞİSEL VERİLERİN KORUNMASI KANUNU UYARINCA BAŞVURU ...
Apr 14, 2018 ... KİŞİSEL VERİLERİN KORUNMASI KANUNU ... D.Lütfen Kişisel Verilerin Korunması Kanunu kapsamındaki talebinizi detaylı olarak belirtiniz:.
- Kulak Burun Boğaz Hastalıklarında İleri Çözümler - Memorial
MEMORIAL tarafından, Kişisel Verilerin Korunması Kanunu kapsamında hazırlanan Aydınlatma Metni'ni okudum. MEMORIAL tarafından Bilgilendirme Metni kapsamında ...
- Okulda Spor Yaralanmaları Kalıcı Hasarlara Neden Olabilir - Memorial
Sep 14, 2011 ... ... Aydınlatma Metni'ni okudum. MEMORIAL tarafından Bilgilendirme Metni kapsamında elektronik ileti (arama, sms, mail vb) gönderimi için onay ...
- Confidentialité et conditions d'utilisation - Memorial
Droits d'auteur et propriété intellectuelle. Ces politiques de confidentialité ont été préparées par le Memorial Health Group afin de déterminer ses ...
- Assoc. Prof. Ömerul Faruk AYDIN - Memorial
I have reviewed the Privacy Notice in accordance with the relevant Personal Data Protection Law. Hereby, I explicitly consent to the processing of my ...
- Politica privind cookie-urile - Memorial
Browserele pot fi setate să blocheze cookie-urile sau să alerteze utilizatorul atunci când un cookie este trimis către dispozitiv. Deoarece gestionarea cookie- ...
- Untitled
Hastane Yönetimi, Hasta Hakları, Hasta Deneyimi bölümleri tarafından hasta memnuniyetinin ölçülmesi, arttırılması ve araştırılması,; Kurumun iş birliği ...
- Promotion - Memorial
Our Patient Rights Office and Policy. Our Patient Experience Center investigates patient problems and suggestions by ...
- Tıbbi İkinci Görüş - Memorial
... veriyorum. Gönder. © 2026 Memorial Sağlık Grubu. Bu site reCAPTCHA ile korunmaktadır ve Google'ın Gizlilik Politikası ile Hizmet Şartları geçerlidir.
This control reviews indexed-search discoverability only. It does not establish that a document is current or present on the live website, and legal compliance was not verified.
Legal Check (Sectoral & Jurisdiction Legal Intelligence)
ip_estimateScore Breakdown
Top Legal Gaps
- Strengthen the public privacy notice with clearly layered purposes, legal basis, rights, transfers and retention information.
- Provide discoverable cookie information and verify usable consent/preferences behavior in a rendered browser.
- Provide a distinct patient-facing explanation of sensitive health-data handling under the Türkiye-market transparency lens.
Sector-Critical Findings
Benchmark summary: Comparison covers discoverability, patient and health-data transparency, rights and complaints, policy layering, market localization, accessibility and observable implementation; global references do not import foreign legal rules or certify legal equivalence.
Evidence Ledger
Evidence scope: legal completeness and applicability. A Trust Basics PASS can confirm that a public surface was detected while this card still reports WARN for incomplete content. Indexed-search availability is assessed separately and does not override either result.
Verified Legal Topics
Evaluated Legal Criteria
Core Legal Surfaces
Consent & Implementation
Benchmark Reference Records
How this score is calculated: Legal Check combines applicable jurisdiction/market transparency (45%), sector-specific legal transparency (25%), observable implementation (15%), maturity against curated sector benchmarks (10%), and freshness/ownership signals (5%). The audit evaluates public website evidence for online-reputation and transparency purposes; it is not a legal opinion or certification.
Audit-market context: The market is taken from the country selected for the audit. If no country is selected, ALO.NET Audit estimates the market from the auditor’s IP connection. Market context guides localized comparison; it does not by itself determine the audited company’s governing law.
Benchmark corpus: Comparison uses a versioned, periodically reviewed benchmark and regulatory-reference corpus. Legal pages and guidance can change over time, so the result reflects the corpus version and evidence collected for this audit.
Engine legal-check-engine-v1.0.0 · Jurisdiction pack tr-legal-transparency-v1.0.0 · Corpus healthcare-benchmarks-2026-q3-v1
Competitive Reputation Context
Observed mobile PageSpeed at 37/100 may weaken patient decision confidence; no comparable-peer ranking, overall reputation classification or financial outcome is inferred.
Comparable peers must match sector, business model, brand scale and market context. Each reputation platform is interpreted as its own layer; Google Maps ratings are not blended with Tripadvisor, Trustpilot, OTA, social, SERP or PageSpeed signals.
Public reputation should be framed as patient decision confidence, not popularity. Weak doctor identity, weak clinic trust signals, missing medical disclaimers, poor structured data, or thin educational content should be read as patient trust and medical decision journey risks.
Sector classification is based on bounded audited-root evidence. Each row-level observation remains separately limited by its stated crawl, provider and verification conditions.
Semantic Check
This marketing-oriented comparison examines whether homepage promise, navigation intent and conversion actions remain semantically coherent across the public website evidence collected for this audit.
Evaluated findings may contribute to Verified Checks, which is separate from the future 100-point KPI score. A Not verifiable Navigation-to-Landing Alignment is a WARN coverage state, never a failure; other unavailable, unverified and informational evidence is excluded.
Concrete offer language is observable, but the primary homepage promise relies partly on supporting copy for clarity.
- Memorial Sağlık Grubu, seçkin kadrosu ve memnuniyet odaklı uluslararası kalite standartlarında hizmet anlayışı ile etik ilkeler ışığında daima yanınızda. — https://www.memorial.com.tr/
The phone CTA is actionable, but its tel: target is domestic-only and does not expose an international dialing prefix.
- Kolay Randevu Al — https://www.memorial.com.tr/randevu-al
- 444 7 888 — tel:4447888
- Hastane Randevu — https://www.memorial.com.tr/randevu-al
Not verifiable: The declared page locale and footer prose could not be compared with sufficient linguistic confidence.
- Memorial'ı Tanıyın Kurumsal Neden Memorial? Memorial'da Kariyer Hastane ve Tıp Merkezleri Topluma Katkılarımız Kurumsal Kimlik Kişisel Verilerin Korunması Gizlilik ve Kullanım Şartları Çerez Politikası Online Hizmetler Hastane Randevu E-Sonuç Fiyat Sor E-Teşekkür E-Öneri E-Şikayet Doktor Başvuruları Bize Ulaşın Çerez Y — https://www.memorial.com.tr/
The live brand-search description provides substantive non-legal copy that can introduce the brand or page offer.
- Çocuk Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları (Pediatri) · Memorial Medstar Antalya Hastanesi. Doktorumuz Aytan hanıma ilgisinden dolayı çok teşekkür ediyorum. — https://www.memorial.com.tr/getpatientthank
Frontend Interaction Check
This interaction-oriented review examines whether public contact details and conversion controls expose usable native actions in the collected website evidence.
Source markup does not by itself prove visual clickability. A Not observed contact or CTA input is a FAIL only after accessible bounded source evidence was evaluated; browser-required, restricted and unverified observations are excluded from Verified Checks and canonical KPI scoring.
The observed phone value has a matching native action in source markup.
Email contact text was not reliably observed in the bounded homepage evidence.
Address contact text was not reliably observed in the bounded homepage evidence.
At least one primary CTA exposes a native destination or form action in source markup.
Not verifiable: Source markup cannot prove visual affordance, pointer hit testing, overlay interference, focus visibility or runtime activation.
Logo Consistency Check
Favicon / Site Icon
Trust Basic Web Scraping
Evidence scope: audited-site observation. A green dot means the signal was detected from the audited entry point or bounded first-party evidence. It does not mean the same information was available to the indexed-search provider or that its legal completeness was verified.
Insufficient evidence for a Trust Score. The badge reports detected ten-item Trust Basics; unresolved criteria remain neutral and are not counted as failures.
Schema.org Basic Check
Google SERP Preview
Google SERP stands for Google Search Engine Results Page — the page of results shown when someone searches online for a brand, product, person, service, or related topic. It is often the very first impression a potential customer, partner, or journalist has of the searched entity. Optimizing these elements is frequently one of the highest-return SEO actions available, because it can influence click-through rate before the visitor ever lands on the website.
Source: captured Google organic results for the recorded query. The primary preview requires a URL matching the audited entry or its root locale; other domain pages are disclosed separately.
No audited-entry result was captured in this query. The other domain page below is not the brand homepage preview.
Audited publisher metadata · not captured Google result copy
Other captured domain page · not the audited entry
www.memorial.com.tr/getpatientthankAI Search Readiness
Six query-scoped observations distinguish page matching, search-assisted answers, source exposure, brand mentions and recommendations. These observations describe the captured query and response, not general AI visibility or ranking. Unverified observations are excluded from Check Score.
Measured observations: 5/6 · Unverified: 1/6. Check Score uses the evaluated observations.
Audited AI query: Memorial Sağlık Grubu önerilir mi?
No complete, scope-matched observation was captured for this measurement.
SEARCH ASSISTED AI ANSWER CAPTURED
Query: Memorial Sağlık Grubu önerilir mi? · Observed: 2026-10-08T14:36:46+00:00
OWN DOMAIN NOT IN COMPLETE REFERENCES
Query: Memorial Sağlık Grubu önerilir mi? · Observed: 2026-10-08T14:36:46+00:00
EXACT BRAND IN AI ANSWER
Query: Memorial Sağlık Grubu önerilir mi? · Observed: 2026-10-08T14:36:46+00:00
NO SUPPORTED EXPLICIT RECOMMENDATION
Query: Memorial Sağlık Grubu önerilir mi? · Observed: 2026-10-08T14:36:46+00:00
BRAND MENTION WITHOUT ATTACHED CITATION
Query: Memorial Sağlık Grubu önerilir mi? · Observed: 2026-10-08T14:36:46+00:00
Captured answer and citations
Complete captured mapping. Links show provider attachments to answer blocks; source support for every claim is not independently verified.
Memorial Sağlık Grubu, Türkiye’nin köklü ve yaygın özel sağlık zincirlerinden biri olarak hem olumlu hem de eleştirilen yönleriyle değerlendirilmektedir. Kurum hakkındaki genel yaklaşımlar ve hasta deneyimleri şu başlıklar altında özetlenebilir:
Avantajları ve Olumlu Yönler
Güçlü Doktor Kadrosu: Alanında tanınmış, akademik kariyer sahibi uzman ve profesörlerle çalışması en önemli tercih sebeplerindendir.
Tıbbi Altyapı ve Teknoloji: Tanı ve tedavi süreçlerinde güncel teknolojik cihazların kullanılması, özellikle cerrahi branşlarda ve onkoloji gibi kritik alanlarda güven vermektedir.
Uluslararası Standartlar: JCI (Joint Commission International) akreditasyonlarına sahip ilk hastanelerden biri olması nedeniyle hijyen, hasta güvenliği ve süreç yönetimi konularında belirli bir standardı barındırır.
Konfor ve Hizmet Kalitesi: Yatan hasta hizmetleri, oda konforu ve genel personel yaklaşımı özel sağlık sektörünün üst segmentindedir.
Dezavantajlar ve Eleştirilen Yönler
Yüksek Maliyetler: Muagene, tetkik ve ameliyat ücretleri diğer özel hastanelere veya devlet hastanelerine kıyasla oldukça yüksektir. Tamamlayıcı ya da özel sağlık sigortası kapsamı dışındaki ek ödemeler sürpriz yaratabilmektedir.
Yoğunluk ve Bekleme Süreleri: Popüler şubelerinde (Şişli, Bahçelievler vb.) randevu saatlerinde sarkmalar, acil servislerde veya polikliniklerde yoğunluk kaynaklı bekleme sürelerinin uzaması şikayet konusu olabilmektedir.
İdari ve Sigorta Süreçleri: Faturalandırma, provizyon onayları veya epikriz raporlarının teslimi gibi bürokratik süreçlerde zaman zaman aksaklıklar yaşandığına dair hasta geri bildirimleri bulunmaktadır.
https://www.sikayetvar.com/memorial-hastanesi
Genel olarak, bütçe kısıtı öncelikli değilse ve kritik/özellikli bir tedavi planlanıyorsa güçlü hekim kadrosu nedeniyle değerlendirilir. Ancak rutin kontroller veya genel muayeneler için maliyet-fayda dengesinin iyi tartılması önerilir.
Eğer belirtmek isterseniz:
Hangi şehir veya branş için düşünüyorsunuz?
Özel bir sağlık sigortanız var mı?
Bu detayları paylaşırsanız size daha nokta atışı bir değerlendirme veya alternatif önerisi yapabilirim.
Supporting technical observations
About: PASS · Contact: PASS · Schema types: MedicalOrganization, Person, Place, PostalAddress. Technical presence supports interpretation; it does not prove an AI answer, recommendation, citation or indexing.
DNS & Email Trust
Hospital comparison withheld: one or more retained listings lack a verified hospital identity. Original audit findings, scores and dates are unchanged.
