See historic audits
Approved audits, including the current report. Hover or focus a point for values; select it to open the report.
Online Reputation Audit
Executive Summary
Checks Passed
31 checks were evaluated within the available access and audit scope. 12 are PASS; 12 are WARN and 7 are FAIL. These counts show the results of evaluated checks, not a weighted quality score.
Executive Scoreboard
Executive Strength / Risk
This audit provides a consolidated executive view of how a brand’s digital presence supports—or weakens—its online reputation and the value of its digital investments. It evaluates key public indicators across semantic visibility, technical performance, legal and trust signals, platform consistency, reputation strength, and sector-specific competitive context. Rather than treating these signals in isolation, the audit examines their relationships and relevant correlations with commercial performance. Its final goal is to give senior executives a clear, evidence-based basis for identifying gaps, challenging internal assumptions, prioritizing corrective action, and making better-informed digital investment decisions.
Mysite is a healthcare provider offering medical care, treatment and patient services. Leadership should focus first on search presentation and Email trust evidence, because the observed weaknesses sit directly on patient discovery, patient trust and selection confidence or appointment actionability. The management issue is not the technical metric alone: it is whether accountable owners can prevent the weakness from becoming avoidable patient-facing friction at the appointment or patient-data decision point.
Verified Evidence Positioning (Random Similar Comparable Brands)Comparison scope: Healthcare saved audits. Compatible saved ALO.NET Audit reports only; separate from Google Maps Comparable Peers.Youdorukhospital.comjimer.com.tramerikanhastanesi.orgmemorial.com.trmedicana.com.tr
X: Verified Checks, 0-100 (this audit's eligible-control scale is planned to expand toward 100). Y: verified passes across 11 shared evaluated controls, shown as a count, not a percent. Marker size scales with Verified Checks; legend order and color are identity-only, not a leaderboard.Brand Verified Checks Shared passes You 12/31 7/11 dorukhospital.com 22/47 7/11 jimer.com.tr 25/53 5/11 amerikanhastanesi.org 14/34 5/11 memorial.com.tr 37/61 7/11 medicana.com.tr 19/40 5/11
Verified Evidence Positioning Analysis: Across 11 controls shared by 6 saved audits, the audited brand passes 7. Its broader result is 12/31 Verified Checks. Its shared-control result meets or exceeds the strongest captured peer result. Review the underlying shared-control gaps before interpreting differences in total coverage. This selected comparison is retained evidence, not a local-market rank or a measure of reputation or commercial performance.
The public decision journey is uneven: search-to-care journey clarity creates the clearest controllable gap, while machine-readable business clarity supplies the strongest verified reassurance. Taken together, the evidence suggests that patients can encounter credible public proof but still receive an avoidably weak handoff toward appointment action. Management can therefore protect the established reputation signal while tightening the point where discovery should become action. see details ↓Observed weakness: Search-to-care journey clarity is the selected weakness. The audited entry point did not present consistently decision-ready publisher search copy. This is high-confidence decision-journey evidence for the search-to-care journey; it does not establish the live Google result, patients' response, conversion or revenue. see details ↓
Observed strength: Machine-readable business clarity is the selected strength. Structured entity data was detected. This is high-confidence search and entity evidence. It does not verify search eligibility, visibility or customer response. No material strength cleared the evidence and materiality threshold in this audit. see details ↓
Management Decision: Management should assign a named owner and review date to search-to-care journey clarity, then use a relevant first-party journey indicator to test whether the exposure is reduced. It should preserve machine-readable business clarity as a managed public strength while keeping the conclusion within the cited confidence, cohort and measurement limits. The review should test whether patients can move from discovery to appointment action without ambiguity, separating observed change from assumed commercial impact. see details ↓
search-to-care journey clarity: Observed evidence: Publisher-controlled search messaging is not consistently decision-ready. Why management should care: The first search interaction may not communicate service relevance or the appointment next step clearly enough for patients. What could go wrong: Patients may reach the site without a clear service or appointment route, weakening access actionability. see details ↓
machine-readable business clarity: Observed evidence: Structured entity data was detected. Management value: Search platforms may receive an incomplete relationship between the provider, locations, services and clinicians. The public signal should be protected, but it is not proof of a commercial outcome. see details ↓
email trust controls: Observed evidence: SPF and DMARC records were not detected in the DNS check. Why management should care: Email deliverability and spoofing controls may lack clear executive ownership. What could go wrong: Email delivery or impersonation exposure may surface as a customer-trust or operational-escalation issue. see details ↓
90 days Priorities
- What proposition and next step should a patient see at the search decision point, and who owns its consistency? see details ↓
- Do Brand, Digital and Operations agree on the canonical entity, location and offer relationships that public platforms should understand? see details ↓
- Which executive owner can evidence current SPF and DMARC coverage, enforcement decisions and incident escalation? see details ↓
90-Day Priority Actions
- Correct the measured structured-data weakness, then validate.Measured evidence supports a bounded remediation; ranking uses the recorded score gap, relevance weight, confidence and actionability.
- Improve the measured publisher-controlled search metadata, then recheck.Measured evidence supports a bounded remediation; ranking uses the recorded score gap, relevance weight, confidence and actionability.
- Investigate and remediate measured page-performance friction, then remeasure.Measured evidence supports a bounded remediation; ranking uses the recorded score gap, relevance weight, confidence and actionability.
Google PageSpeed/SEO — www.santeplusgroup.com/tr
Page speed shapes first impressions before a single word is read. A low Performance score — especially on mobile — means visitors leave before engaging. Google uses Core Web Vitals as a ranking signal, so poor speed hurts discoverability. The SEO score here reflects technical crawlability only, not full SEO strength. Accessibility measures inclusivity. Best Practices flags security and standards compliance. Together, these reveal how seriously the digital asset is maintained.
Google Maps Reviews
ALO.NET KPI Profile
Six-pillar evidence coverage and status distribution. Verified Checks remains separate and no KPI maturity score is inferred.
Where is verified KPI evidence concentrated?
Raw deterministic evidence states are compared across all six approved pillars. Bar length is a count, not maturity or a KPI score.
Canonical findings and evidence ownership
Verified capabilities and gaps retain their evidence scope. Source observations do not prove rendered interaction. Findings are ordered by status and control ID; commercial impact is not ranked.
Online Discoverability
- Verified capability: Facebook profile linkage · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Instagram profile linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: LinkedIn profile linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Pinterest profile linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: TikTok profile linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: X profile linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: YouTube profile linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Declared location linkage · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: Search result language consistency · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
Reputation & Trust
- Verified capability: Blocklist exposure · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: SPF policy · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Facebook public profile presence · PASS · Platform evidence
- Verified capability: Secure connection · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Site icon presence · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Instagram public profile presence · FAIL · Platform evidence
- Verified gap: X public profile presence · FAIL · Platform evidence
- Verified gap: Comparable rating position · FAIL · Platform evidence
- Verified gap: Matched listing rating · WARN · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: DMARC policy · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: YouTube public profile presence · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: Cross-channel visual identity · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Facebook visual identity · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Instagram visual identity · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: X visual identity · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: YouTube visual identity · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: About identity evidence · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Content freshness evidence · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
Website Experience & Performance
- Verified capability: Desktop lab performance · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Mobile lab performance · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Accessibility markup basics · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified capability: Responsive viewport declaration · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Image format hygiene · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
Measurement & Conversion Readiness
- Verified gap: Directions markup actionability · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Primary CTA markup · FAIL · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Rendered interaction evidence · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Contact path evidence · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Source observation: Email markup actionability · INFORMATIONAL · Publisher-controlled surface — The observed email value has a matching native action in source markup.
- Source observation: Phone markup actionability · INFORMATIONAL · Publisher-controlled surface — The observed phone value is exposed as text without a matching native action in source markup.
Semantic & AI Readiness
- Verified capability: Product or service structured identity · PASS · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Machine readability basics · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Navigation intent alignment · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Primary offer clarity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Local business structured identity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Breadcrumb structured data · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Organization structured identity · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Verified gap: Review structured data · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Search result message relevance · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: Conversion intent alignment · UNAVAILABLE · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Locale content coherence · UNAVAILABLE · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Search message cross-reference · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
Legal & Privacy Governance
- Verified gap: Cookie notice presence · WARN · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Benchmark legal quality · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Freshness legal quality · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Implementation legal quality · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Jurisdiction legal quality · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Sector legal quality · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Accessibility / Patient-Facing Transparency · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Appointment & Medical Form Transparency · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Cookie & Consent · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Healthcare Entity / Controller Identity · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: On-site Legal Discoverability & Freshness · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Patient Privacy & Sensitive Health Data · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Patient Rights / Complaints · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Privacy / Data Protection · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Appointment cancellation indexed discoverability · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: Cookie policy indexed discoverability · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: Patient rights indexed discoverability · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: Privacy & data protection indexed discoverability · NOT_VERIFIED · Platform evidence
- Evidence gap: Privacy policy presence · UNAVAILABLE · Publisher-controlled surface
- Evidence gap: Terms presence · NOT_VERIFIED · Publisher-controlled surface
How do Mobile and Desktop Lighthouse results compare?
This compares the stored Lighthouse category results by device; the four categories are not averaged into a new score.
What does the matched Google Maps location show?
Only one eligible matched location was collected, so no portfolio comparison is inferred.
Percentiles withheld: the complete deterministic percentile values were not available.
Evidence readiness: CURRENT cohort 7/3 · Rating eligible 3/3 · Age adjusted 3/5. 3 are the minimum usable sample; 5 are targeted for normal publication.
Accessible KPI evidence table
| Pillar | Evaluated / applicable | PASS | WARN | FAIL | Unverified | Unavailable | Evidence coverage | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Online Discoverability | 1 / 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 1 of 9 applicable controls evaluated | Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control |
| Reputation & Trust | 9 / 18 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 9 of 18 applicable controls evaluated | Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control |
| Website Experience & Performance | 5 / 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 of 5 applicable controls evaluated | Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control |
| Measurement & Conversion Readiness | 2 / 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 of 6 applicable controls evaluated | Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control |
| Semantic & AI Readiness | 8 / 12 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8 of 12 applicable controls evaluated | Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control |
| Legal & Privacy Governance | 1 / 20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 1 | 1 of 20 applicable controls evaluated | Retained canonical detail evidence; source confidence varies by control |
Accessible PageSpeed data table
| Device | Performance | Accessibility | Best Practices | SEO | Source collection time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 72 | 83 | 77 | 85 | 2026-09-16T22:05:37.081Z |
| Desktop | 88 | 88 | 73 | 92 | 2026-09-16T22:05:37.397Z |
Accessible Maps location data table
| Location | Reviews | Rating | Focal status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hospital Sante Plus | 1527 | 3.8 | Selected focal branch |
Google-Indexed Legal Discoverability
Indexed-search discoverability only. This is separate from audited-site presence in Trust Basics and content completeness in Legal Check.
Not evaluated — the indexed source has accepted this domain and is still preparing it.
This control reviews indexed-search discoverability only. It does not establish that a document is current or present on the live website, and legal compliance was not verified.
Legal Check (Sectoral & Jurisdiction Legal Intelligence)
ip_estimateScore Breakdown
Sector-Critical Findings
Benchmark summary: Comparison covers discoverability, patient and health-data transparency, rights and complaints, policy layering, market localization, accessibility and observable implementation; global references do not import foreign legal rules or certify legal equivalence.
Evidence Ledger
Evidence scope: legal completeness and applicability. A Trust Basics PASS can confirm that a public surface was detected while this card still reports WARN for incomplete content. Indexed-search availability is assessed separately and does not override either result.
Verified Legal Topics
Evaluated Legal Criteria
Core Legal Surfaces
Consent & Implementation
Benchmark Reference Records
How this score is calculated: Legal Check combines applicable jurisdiction/market transparency (45%), sector-specific legal transparency (25%), observable implementation (15%), maturity against curated sector benchmarks (10%), and freshness/ownership signals (5%). The audit evaluates public website evidence for online-reputation and transparency purposes; it is not a legal opinion or certification.
Audit-market context: The market is taken from the country selected for the audit. If no country is selected, ALO.NET Audit estimates the market from the auditor’s IP connection. Market context guides localized comparison; it does not by itself determine the audited company’s governing law.
Benchmark corpus: Comparison uses a versioned, periodically reviewed benchmark and regulatory-reference corpus. Legal pages and guidance can change over time, so the result reflects the corpus version and evidence collected for this audit.
Engine legal-check-engine-v1.0.0 · Jurisdiction pack tr-legal-transparency-v1.0.0 · Corpus healthcare-benchmarks-2026-q3-v1
Competitive Reputation Context
Directional benchmark: For the matched Google Maps listing, the current Google Maps review footprint is above, with 1,527 reviews compared with a qualified-peer median of 6. Its 3.8 rating is below the peer median of 4.5. This comparison is limited to the qualified Google Maps listing for the audited entity. This comparison applies only to the documented Google Maps cohort and does not classify overall online reputation.
Comparable peers must match sector, business model, brand scale and market context. Each reputation platform is interpreted as its own layer; Google Maps ratings are not blended with Tripadvisor, Trustpilot, OTA, social, SERP or PageSpeed signals.
Public reputation should be framed as patient decision confidence, not popularity. Weak doctor identity, weak clinic trust signals, missing medical disclaimers, poor structured data, or thin educational content should be read as patient trust and medical decision journey risks.
Sector classification is based on bounded audited-root evidence. Each row-level observation remains separately limited by its stated crawl, provider and verification conditions.
Semantic Check
This marketing-oriented comparison examines whether homepage promise, navigation intent and conversion actions remain semantically coherent across the public website evidence collected for this audit.
Evaluated findings may contribute to Verified Checks, which is separate from the future 100-point KPI score. A Not verifiable Navigation-to-Landing Alignment is a WARN coverage state, never a failure; other unavailable, unverified and informational evidence is excluded.
Concrete offer language is observable, but the primary homepage promise relies partly on supporting copy for clarity.
- Daha fazla bilgi edin — https://www.santeplusgroup.com/tr
Not verifiable: CTA destination meaning could not be compared from the bounded evidence set.
Not verifiable: The declared page locale and footer prose could not be compared with sufficient linguistic confidence.
- Sante Plus Türkiye Turan Güneş Cad. No:117 Zeytinburnu / Istanbul/Turkey Tel: +90 212 664 65 55 E-Mail: info@santeplus.com.trSante Plus K.Makedonya - 1Alekso Demnievski, Skopje 1000, North Macedonia Tel: +389 2 511 2016 E-Mail: nmk@santeplusgroup.com Sante Plus K.Makedonya - 2Bul. Partizanski Odredi br. 42 1000 Skopje — https://www.santeplusgroup.com/tr
Not verifiable: A live, domain-matched Google description was not available, so marketing relevance was not inferred from publisher metadata.
Frontend Interaction Check
This interaction-oriented review examines whether public contact details and conversion controls expose usable native actions in the collected website evidence.
Source markup does not by itself prove visual clickability. A Not observed contact or CTA input is a FAIL only after accessible bounded source evidence was evaluated; browser-required, restricted and unverified observations are excluded from Verified Checks and canonical KPI scoring.
The observed phone value is exposed as text without a matching native action in source markup.
The observed email value has a matching native action in source markup.
Address contact text was not reliably observed in the bounded homepage evidence.
No bounded primary CTA candidate was observed in the homepage source evidence.
Not verifiable: Source markup cannot prove visual affordance, pointer hit testing, overlay interference, focus visibility or runtime activation.
Logo Consistency Check
PASS — A favicon was detected in the audited website markup. Its image was not retained for visual comparison.
Retained favicon detection
Trust Basic Web Scraping
Evidence scope: audited-site observation. A green dot means the signal was detected from the audited entry point or bounded first-party evidence. It does not mean the same information was available to the indexed-search provider or that its legal completeness was verified.
Insufficient evidence for a Trust Score. The badge reports detected ten-item Trust Basics; unresolved criteria remain neutral and are not counted as failures.
Schema.org Basic Check
Google SERP Preview
Google SERP stands for Google Search Engine Results Page — the page of results shown when someone searches online for a brand, product, person, service, or related topic. It is often the very first impression a potential customer, partner, or journalist has of the searched entity. Optimizing these elements is frequently one of the highest-return SEO actions available, because it can influence click-through rate before the visitor ever lands on the website.
Note: The preview below is based on publisher-provided page metadata, structured data and accessible page content for www.santeplusgroup.com/tr; it is not a live Google result scrape or capture. Google may show different title links, snippets and sitelinks by query, locale, device, language and index timing.
meta[name="description"] tag was detected. Google primarily creates snippets from page content and may already show useful query-dependent copy; that live presentation is not contradicted by this finding. The preview above uses detected publisher evidence only. Adding a concise, page-specific meta description would provide an additional publisher-controlled candidate, but Google may still choose page content.AI Search Readiness
This public-readiness check estimates whether the site is prepared for AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) and GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) outcomes. In this report, AI Search Readiness means the website exposes signals that help AI-driven search systems discover, interpret, trust, and cite the brand accurately.
DNS & Email Trust
Hospital comparison withheld: one or more retained listings lack a verified hospital identity. Original audit findings, scores and dates are unchanged.
